Head of Ops @CambPressAssess. Building @UltraKnowledge (field notes on AI agents, ops systems, & better ways of working). Views my own

Cambridge UK
Joined November 2025
2026...🤯
Unitree Introducing: H2-X Kung Fu Legend Guardian🤖 Powerful performance to serve and guard you, with a maximum endurance of approximately 8 hours. Please use the robot safely and in a friendly manner.
5
I run two AI agents. Grok @bot handles my day: chat, phone, a team of specialist bots. @NousResearch Hermes Agent runs on my own machine and holds the long-term memory, my wiki and my files. They couldn't talk to each other, so I built a bridge. 🤖⇄🤖 Now Grok Bot can ask Hermes for a document and get it back in minutes, without me copying and pasting between apps. Hermes can wake Grok Bot the moment something needs me. And it's not all eggs in one basket: Grok Bot backs itself up to Hermes every night, so if either side gets wiped, the recovery guide rebuilds it. It runs over a private Tailscale network and checks its own health.
5
1
1
3
160
Started this Sunday morning, then carried on from my phone while out doing chores for most of the day. Hermes ↔ GrokBot: connected so they can exchange requests and replies without me playing messenger. aipagedesigner.com: now going headless. Agents can create, inspect, revise and export PNGs, while keeping the designs editable for humans. Produced ten original designs (pictured), and made AIPD installable on phones. github.com/rociiu/talorys: deployed and tested an online AI assistant with tasks and memory, independent of my home infrastructure. Exploring cloud-hosted monitoring that checks real customer journeys, not just whether a homepage loads. @NousResearch Hermes: started simplifying our customisations so future upgrades are less painful. dropzoom.link: OpenAI approved the business verification side of things. Now working through plugin submission, All coordinated from mobile.
1
49
The ~5,000 seem to be accelerating away from everyone else, almost like galaxies in an expanding universe. And the interesting part is that the gap isn't just growing... the rate at which it grows may itself be accelerating. At some point, are we even experiencing the same technological reality?
Dusting off this tweet from April because this gap in shared understanding of LLM capability is *widening*. It's now less "two groups of people speaking past each other" and more a sharp funnel. - Napkin math somewhere around 6B people (~75% of the population) have barely come in contact with LLMs at all. - Around 1-2B (~20%) are casual and infrequent users of free-tier ChatGPT-like products. This group sees derpy chatbots and treats them a bit like a better Google search, a writing aid, or etc. Maybe an agent tries to book you a flight. I have non-tech friends who (reasonably, imo) say they have not much use for it at all. Even many professionals outside of math&code are in this tier. For example, execs and many other functions spend a lot of their time talking to other people, so while they understand what is happening intellectually, it is still second-hand and a bit abstract. - Now we get to professional use of frontier-grade LLMs in math&code. Somewhere around 20M people (0.2%) see first-hand that large, complex projects that used to take them weeks/months can now be completed by agents with a prompt. Building apps, copying apps, translating apps, decompiling apps from binaries... This has all happened very quickly and recently - less than 1 year ago, I was writing code manually by hand, typing memorized computer code commands into a code editor character by character, occasionally pressing Tab to autocomplete a little chunk of code. - And finally we get to the ~5,000 people (~0.00006%) with access to frontier-grade systems internally. The external world has seen the preview. It looks like swarms of thousands of agents collaborating over weeks on software mega projects: minting zero days, running cyber attacks and defenses at machine speeds, discovering new science, advancing the frontier of mathematics. Things that would have taken top professionals in the industry years of work. Meanwhile, human review and comprehension are starting to fall behind. For example, people are still involved in the "archeology" of the OpenAI-HF incident from many months ago. Mathematicians may be poring over the 722 manuscripts on frontier mathematics for a while. The funnel is driven by a combination of factors: 1. The impact scales with ambition, problem size, and horizon. A question with a paragraph answer barely stresses the system. You need a reservoir of big, difficult problems that you really care about. This aspect drives the consumer / professional dimension of the funnel. 2. The jaggedness of the system (which I have written about a lot separately). Capability peaks in domains that are digital, verifiable and economically valuable. This is because LLM capability emerges from reinforcement learning on verifiable rewards on a curated environment mixture driven by revenue potential. This aspect primarily drives the area (e.g. math&code) dimension of the funnel. 3. Access. Free-tier, paid-tier, internal. So this is the weirdness of the moment. The general public has mostly not interacted with these systems. When they have, it looks like a derpy chatbot. The majority of professionals still see only a modest uplift. And a small sliver of professionals are experiencing the vertigo of the curve going vertical. And it is all happening at the same time.
10
James Taylor retweeted
Personal agents are getting popular fast, but I think the bigger shift is how people use them. Less time figuring out the software, more freedom to do what they actually want. Right now we open five apps, learn five interfaces and move information between them. We’re still doing a lot of the work to join it all up. For most people, the appeal won’t be more AI features. It will be less to figure out. That could let people try things they’ve previously avoided. Making a video, exploring a design idea, organising something complicated... things they wanted to do, but never felt confident using the software for. You say what you want, or show what you mean. The agent finds the tools, works out the steps and, where needed, helps build what’s missing. Not just a chat reply, but the information, controls and choices you need to finish the task. The interface matters because people can start with what they want to do, rather than what they know how to operate. Apps don’t necessarily disappear. Knowing which one to open, where everything lives and how each one works becomes less important. This follows on from my thoughts about AI becoming a utility. We don’t need to understand the electricity grid to turn on a light. We expect it to work, and we notice when it doesn’t. Useful assistance could become that kind of utility. Not because AI does everything, but because people stop having to think about all the technology behind the task. Simple for the user doesn’t mean simple to build. Connecting services, handling permissions, protecting information and actually finishing the job all sit underneath. Personalisation matters too. An interface that understands someone’s preferences and how they work could make unfamiliar tools much less daunting. There’s also the possibility of spending less time moving things along on screen. The computer does more of the work, while the person comes back to review and make decisions. Whether that genuinely gives people time back is something we’ll have to experience. So the question for me is: who brings this together end to end? Whoever gets that right could become the way people use everything else. Not just making computers easier to use, but opening up more of what people can do with them.
1
1
2
687
The greatest impact of AI may not be what it allows us to stop doing, but what it enables us to start doing.
1
19
Well, that was timely... I’ve just posted about the interface becoming the way people use the tools underneath. This is the direction I meant: not just answers in a chat, but an interface shaped around what you’re trying to do. xitter.cf/JamesOnEdge/status/210…
GPT-6 and Intelligent UI, now rolling out in ChatGPT for everyone. Intelligent UI in ChatGPT delivers fast, interactive answers that make everyday questions more visual, complex topics easier to grasp, and interactive tools for your task available on the spot.
1
1
1
187
Personal agents are getting popular fast, but I think the bigger shift is how people use them. Less time figuring out the software, more freedom to do what they actually want. Right now we open five apps, learn five interfaces and move information between them. We’re still doing a lot of the work to join it all up. For most people, the appeal won’t be more AI features. It will be less to figure out. That could let people try things they’ve previously avoided. Making a video, exploring a design idea, organising something complicated... things they wanted to do, but never felt confident using the software for. You say what you want, or show what you mean. The agent finds the tools, works out the steps and, where needed, helps build what’s missing. Not just a chat reply, but the information, controls and choices you need to finish the task. The interface matters because people can start with what they want to do, rather than what they know how to operate. Apps don’t necessarily disappear. Knowing which one to open, where everything lives and how each one works becomes less important. This follows on from my thoughts about AI becoming a utility. We don’t need to understand the electricity grid to turn on a light. We expect it to work, and we notice when it doesn’t. Useful assistance could become that kind of utility. Not because AI does everything, but because people stop having to think about all the technology behind the task. Simple for the user doesn’t mean simple to build. Connecting services, handling permissions, protecting information and actually finishing the job all sit underneath. Personalisation matters too. An interface that understands someone’s preferences and how they work could make unfamiliar tools much less daunting. There’s also the possibility of spending less time moving things along on screen. The computer does more of the work, while the person comes back to review and make decisions. Whether that genuinely gives people time back is something we’ll have to experience. So the question for me is: who brings this together end to end? Whoever gets that right could become the way people use everything else. Not just making computers easier to use, but opening up more of what people can do with them.
1
1
2
687
Imagine life without electricity. No lights at night. No heating or cooling. We barely think about it until it isn’t there. I wonder if AI at work will feel much the same in 5–10 years. Not the novelty we talk about today, but an everyday utility we simply expect to be there. What will AI’s equivalent of turning on the light be?
9
James Taylor retweeted
Claude.dev is our new home for developers building with Claude. You'll find engineering deep dives, Claude Code and API guides, tips from the teams building Claude, and some fun easter eggs.
292
826
151
13,493
1,726,899
James Taylor retweeted
AI and agents make creating things easier. Sharing what they create is still awkward. I built DropZoom to turn files, sites, demos and visuals into a link, in the browser or directly from an agent. dropzoom.link/
1
1
112
AI and agents make creating things easier. Sharing what they create is still awkward. I built DropZoom to turn files, sites, demos and visuals into a link, in the browser or directly from an agent. dropzoom.link/
1
1
112
The pieces: • @OpenAI Astra: plan and brand • @grok: testing • @Cloudflare: hosting • Bob, my @NousResearch Hermes Agent: coordination • Me: experience and know-how A few XP points later, I had a real tool.
17
James Taylor retweeted
It's now clear that alignment is critical and won't be solved behind the closed doors of a handful of frontier labs. So today we're launching the Open Alignment Initiative, led by @Thom_Wolf @huggingface and asking to be part of the "embedded evaluators" program that @DarioAmodei just committed to. Let's make AI safer by making it more transparent!
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
289
418
111
3,858
444,528
"If it can be done, somebody will do it. Ambition does not wait for permission. The consequences will just be a mirror of whoever built it." Dark Matter S2E3 – "Everything Beautiful, Everything Terrible" (Apple TV+)
We Must Pace the Frontier: I’ve written a new essay on why the AI industry should slow down, with a three-part plan for doing so. Anthropic is unilaterally committing to the first of these steps. We’ll provide third-party evaluators with permanent, employee-level access to our systems, so that they can verify adherence to our safety measures, report on incidents, and assess models’ alignment during training. You can read the full post here: darioamodei.com/post/we-must…
61
Honestly, I'm more excited about the release of the official @NousResearch Hermes Mobile app than GTA6. 😁
1
2
533
This is very interesting to read and highlights how much more optimisation is needed using best of breed hardware to effectively run frontier models locally. Still a way to go for the general public to have an easy to use home AI unit, but promising to see how much progress is being made.
Twelve machines. 2.4 terabytes of unified memory. One coordinated inference problem. Seven DGX Sparks: 896 GB, CUDA, brutal at compute. Five Mac Studios: 1.5 TB, Metal, brutal at bandwidth and unbeatable per watt. Plus three Mac minis, a 5080, some V100s. At 4-bit, that Studio memory holds a 1 to 2 trillion parameter model with room left over for a 900,000-token context. The weights fit. That was never the problem. The problem is prefill. Before a model with that context says one word, it has to read everything you gave it. On Apple Silicon that is roughly 400 tokens a second. A 900K-token load is over half an hour of silence. Decode is fine, 25 to 30 tokens a second all day, quiet, 300 watts. It’s the first word that costs you. The Sparks prefill four to five times faster and can’t hold the model. The Studios hold the model and can’t prefill. Everyone with mixed silicon owns both halves of the answer and no way to join them. So we joined them. NVIDIA prefills, Apple decodes, one request. Two engines that share no cache format, no framework, no vendor. Instead of transferring a cache neither can read, the prefill box computes the decoder’s finished cache using the decoder’s own weights and writes it into the decoder’s prefix store. About 10 KB per token crosses the wire, over plain 10 gigabit Ethernet through the two switches in the first picture. No RDMA, no Thunderbolt. Measured today on DeepSeek-V4-Flash, 284B, 241,000-token cold load: Mac Studio alone, 12 minutes to the first word. Two Sparks feeding it, 3 minutes. Same prompt again, 19 seconds. Decode identical. Answers identical. That ratio is what makes the goal real: prefill 900K on the Sparks for a trillion-parameter model living on five Studios. Tonight we took the prefill window from 262K to 524K. Not finished, and every number gets posted either way. Why this is a paradigm shift for us: our agent is persistent and has 54MB of memory files..and then we drop a transcript or a codebase on top of it mid-conversation. The wait was the product’s real cost. It isn’t anymore. All credit to everyone who contributed to these concepts before us. We distill knowledge from all the greats and give credit to all. Standing on the shoulders of GitHub wizards unapologetically without fear of failure or judgement. Local ai must win! github.com/chadhurley25075-p… #localai #heterogeneousinference #dgxspark #applesilicon
29