James Shinn

Utter rubbish shite. Innumerable evolutionists have already refuted this nonsense including @RichardDawkins among many others. There is not a single scientific phenomenon that has received as much evidence across countless disciplines as is the case with evolution. There is more evidence for the veracity of evolution than there is for f**king gravity, and these types of clowns continue to spew their garbage.

HOLY CR*P 🚨 James O’Keefe just got an FBI Official who “does investigations” saying NO ONE WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE for the Minnesota fraud exposed He says nobody will be arrested. Nobody will go to prison He says it’s intentional. (INSANE)

Muslims do nothing but destroy. They don't create art, they don't help others, they kill, rape, steal and maim. They are a Satanic death cult.

How do they regulate online purchases of creatine? @grok is this real?

American Pastor warns his church of the Islamic Takeover of America after what happened during Midterms He shows his congregation all the Muslims that are now elected and will serve in American government “Ladies and gentlemen, those of you who didn't vote, you voted. 255 Muslims who cannot, cannot swear allegiance to the Constitution. It is forbidden in Islam. They must swear allegiance to Sharia law, which is a completely different government. On Tuesday, the United States of America said no to the republic and yes to the very government and military and religion that hit us on September 11th, 2001. We have surrendered. It's their party now” ‘Millions of Evangelical Christians failed to vote during the midterms. Look at the consequences. Most churches are now irrelevant social clubs’ - There are now over 255 Muslims elected serving in office - 8 Muslims elected to Congress • 97 Muslim candidates won election or reelection across federal, state, and local offices in 21 states - More than 160 Muslims ran for office He’s right it’s time to fight for your country. It’s time to use churches as voting bases just like Muslims do with mosques If we don’t get serious about this, we will fall to Islam. The proof is as clear as day “If Texas goes down, Islam knows the nation falls. Prepare your children, prepare your hearts, prepare your faith.”

Watch this woman's brain malfunction when asked a simple question about abortion | Joel Abbott, Not The Bee Liberal woman: Have you ever been in a spot where you have needed to abort a child? TPUSA host: Well, considering I am a man, I don't often find myself in the situation where I'm pregnant, so no. Liberal woman: Exactly! Liberal woman: You will never have to experience the pain and shame of wanting to carry something that you don't - TPUSA host: Okay, let me ask you this: Do you think slavery is wrong? Liberal woman: Absolutely! TPUSA host: Whoa! You will never have to experience the pain or shame of being a slave. So how dare you come up and tell me your opinion on that. Liberal woman: Because it's obvious! TPUSA host: Right, so again, do you start to see where this idea has a little bit of flaws? It's also obvious, in the same way that slavery is obviously wrong, that murdering an innocent human is also wrong. Liberal woman: [Glitches, has panic attack] William Wilberforce, the English politician credited with spearheading the movement to abolish slavery across the British Empire, once said this: "You may choose to look the other way but you can never say again that you did not know." It is a fallacy to say we can't label something wrong if we have never experienced it ourselves. Murder, rape, slavery, theft, jealousy, anger, lust, pride, and greed are all wrong, and we can say they are wrong regardless of our #LivedExperiences. This, of course, opens up wider questions. We all know murder is wrong, but why? Because the government says so? Of course not. Even little kids are born with an innate sense of justice (and also an innate desire to steal other kids' toys). The Bible says that even people who don't believe in God act in ways that show how God's rules are "written on their hearts." We all know that punching a puppy is bad, in other words. All humans have a conscience, and that is a curious thing. It is difficult to explain evolutionarily, considering that our consciences often work against self-preservation. As C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity: You might just as well try to imagine a country where two and two made five. Men have differed as regards what people you ought to be unselfish to — whether it was only your own family, or your fellow countrymen, or everyone. But they have always agreed that you ought not to put yourself first. Selfishness has never been admired. Men have differed as to whether you should have one wife or four. But they have always agreed that you must not simply have any woman you liked. If slavery is wrong (and we know it is), then murdering a child must be wrong (and we know it is). The pro-abortionists must therefore argue why exceptions for murder must be allowed ... or else they must adopt the Law of the Jungle and claim there is no moral compass in the universe. But in that case, I better not hear them complain when they are executed for murder. notthebee.com/article/watch-…

Doctors Agree On A Psychiatric Diagnosis Only 55% Of The Time, Study Finds | StudyFinds Why Two Psychiatrists Can Look At The Same Patient And See Two Different Illnesses In A Nutshell - Two doctors reviewing the same written psychiatric case agreed on a diagnosis only about 55% of the time. - Schizophrenia cases were the least reliable, sometimes splitting almost evenly with OCD, a personality disorder, or bipolar disorder. - Experience made no real difference. Psychiatrists, residents, and other doctors agreed at similar rates regardless of years in practice. - Bipolar disorder, OCD, and depression cases were matched correctly 88% of the time or higher, showing the problem clusters around specific disorders rather than diagnosis in general. --- A patient walks into one psychiatrist’s office and leaves with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A different patient, describing textbook symptoms of the same disorder to a different doctor, walks out labeled with OCD, a personality disorder, or bipolar disorder instead. That’s what a massive new international study found when it tested more than a thousand doctors using identical written patient cases. Published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, the study gathered 1,038 medical doctors working in adult psychiatry across 19 countries in Europe and South America. Each one read written descriptions of fictional patients and assigned a diagnosis. Because everyone read the same words describing the same patients, disagreement couldn’t be blamed on one doctor asking different questions than another, or a patient having a rough day. Judgment alone was the variable, and it turns out to be wildly inconsistent when it comes to certain mental illnesses. Two doctors looking at the same case agreed on a diagnosis only about 55% of the time. Doctors landed on the reference diagnosis established by an expert panel just 66% of the time overall. For cases involving schizophrenia, that figure sank much lower, with doctors frequently mistaking it for OCD, a personality disorder, or bipolar disorder, depending on which version of the case they saw. Nine Written Cases, 1,038 Doctors, Two Diagnoses Each Researchers built nine fictional patient cases reflecting disorders psychiatrists see regularly: three variations of schizophrenia, plus single cases representing schizotypal disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, OCD, and a personality disorder. Each doctor was randomly given two of the nine cases to diagnose, choosing from a list of 30 common mental health diagnoses, producing 1,902 diagnostic decisions total. Most participants were psychiatrists, though psychiatric residents and other doctors working in adult psychiatry took part too, with experience ranging from brand-new doctors to those with 15 or more years in the field. Experience made almost no difference to how often doctors agreed with each other. A doctor practicing for two years fared about the same as one with twenty, and psychiatrists matched residents and other medical doctors at similar rates. Job title and years on the job showed no meaningful link to agreement, pointing away from a simple lack of training. Something else drives the split. That something else appears to be which disorder is on the table. Some cases produced near-unanimous agreement: bipolar disorder matched the reference diagnosis for 94% of doctors, OCD for 92%, depression for 88%. But schizophrenia cases told a different story. Across the study’s three schizophrenia vignettes, doctors often split between schizophrenia and alternatives, with one case dividing almost evenly between a personality disorder (45%) and schizophrenia (43%), and another seeing 41% call it OCD while only 37% matched schizophrenia. Wrong Diagnoses Clustered Around the Same Alternatives Wrong answers weren’t scattered randomly. When doctors missed a schizophrenia diagnosis, they tended to land on the same alternatives again and again, mainly OCD, a personality disorder, or bipolar disorder. Study authors argue doctors weren’t confused or guessing blindly. Instead, the pattern suggests they were weighing the same symptoms differently, often anchoring on obvious features like obsessive behaviors while giving less weight to the psychotic symptoms that should have pointed toward schizophrenia under standard classification rules. Comparing these results to older research adds weight to the concern. The famous US-UK Diagnostic Project from the 1970s first exposed how differently American and British psychiatrists diagnosed the same patients, prompting a major overhaul of diagnostic manuals in the following decades. Those changes were supposed to fix the problem. This new study, along with agreement scores measured during the 2013 update to the American diagnostic manual, suggests it never fully took. Doctors here performed worse than doctors did during field trials for the third edition of the American diagnostic manual back in the 1980s, landing closer to the shakier scores seen in the decades before that manual existed. A Wrong Label Can Follow a Patient Through Treatment Diagnostic labels aren’t just paperwork. They shape treatment, what a doctor tells a family about the road ahead, and how a patient is understood by every future clinician who reads their chart. If similar disagreement plays out in real practice, it could affect treatment decisions, prognosis, and continuity of care. It matters for research too. Scientific studies of mental illness assume a group of “schizophrenia patients” all share the same underlying condition. If doctors sort patients into that category inconsistently, research samples may be muddier than assumed, which could help explain why it’s been hard to find clean biological explanations or reliably effective treatments tied to specific psychiatric labels. Study authors note this may also explain why transdiagnostic approaches, treatments that don’t rely on a single precise label, have been gaining ground. Real limits apply here, though. Written cases are a controlled, near best-case scenario compared to a live interview, where confusion, incomplete information, and rushed appointments can make things messier still. Researchers themselves suggest their agreement numbers likely mark a ceiling, meaning ordinary practice could produce even lower agreement than what showed up here. Fifty years after the field’s reliability problem was first exposed, and decades after supposedly fixing it with stricter diagnostic rulebooks, psychiatry still hasn’t closed the gap between two doctors looking at the same case and reaching the same conclusion. That’s a crack running through how mental illness gets identified, treated, and studied. studyfinds.com/doctors-agree…

A preclinical discovery indicates that a specific strain of gut bacteria works in tandem with fasting cycles to activate cellular repair mechanisms prior to tissue injury. Investigators at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center demonstrated that a 24-hour fasting period significantly elevates the concentration of a symbiotic gut bacterium, Akkermansia muciniphila, within the small intestine. This microbial population secretes a short-chain fatty acid metabolite known as propionate. Working in conjunction with the host metabolic shifts induced by food deprivation, propionate chemically alters histones to relax the structural packaging around epithelial DNA. This epigenetic restructuring allows intestinal stem cells to preemptively transcribe genes linked to tissue regeneration. Consequently, when the intestinal lining subsequently sustains damage from radiation exposure, these pre-primed cells proliferate rapidly to accelerate structural restoration. Conversely, when the research team depleted this bacterial population using targeted antibiotics, the radioprotective benefits of fasting were entirely lost. Restoring the specific bacterial strain completely reinstated the protective effect. Radiation oncology treatments targeting abdominal or pelvic malignancies frequently cause collateral damage to the highly sensitive mucosal architecture of the small intestine, triggering severe gastrointestinal side effects and occasionally forcing clinicians to limit therapeutic radiation doses. Because strict fasting protocols are frequently impractical or unsafe for oncological patients undergoing active treatment, the investigators hope that therapeutic administration of either Akkermansia muciniphila or its primary metabolite, propionate, could eventually mirror these protective benefits without requiring dietary restriction. Nevertheless, because these findings are derived from a preclinical animal study, it remains unknown whether an identical microbial mechanism occurs in human subjects or if it can safely enhance clinical outcomes during clinical radiotherapy. Despite these translational limitations, the study identifies a clear, accessible biological lever via native gut microbes to protect healthy tissue during cancer care. Moving forward, the investigators plan to explore whether this microbial priming network can be leveraged to safeguard other rapidly dividing tissues, such as bone marrow. [Chen, H., et al. (2026). Fasting primes small intestinal regeneration after damage via Akkermansia muciniphila-produced propionate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 123(28), e2529215123. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2529215123]

Pastor Celebrates Her Abortion: I’ve “Never Felt More Loved by God” buff.ly/rPKYmeD

What rights do men have that women don't have?

Why don't they teach us THIS in school?! "3/4 of the original Christian world was conquered by Islam through extreme violence!" "By the 1600s, Islam had covered MORE of the Earth's surface than the Roman Empire did at its peak. During that war, during that expansion, 280 million people died!" He means 280 million Christians were EXECUTED by Muslims for following Jesus and we're STILL being hunted down and murdered by these satanic savages today in our own streets. And the democrat party gave them asylum while blue state governors harbor and protect them!

At University of Michigan, Anti-Israel Student Attacks Pro-Israel Advocate: “I should have killed you when I had the chance!” frontpagemag.com/at-universi…

Over Shabbat dinner last Friday in Las Vegas, a sweet lady turned to me and said: "So Rawan, your mother tongue is Farsi, right?" I looked at her, speechless. Finally I said, "Why would it be? I'm half Syrian, half Lebanese. Arabic is my mother tongue." "Okay, so these are two different languages," she said. I would have thought that since 9/11, Americans knew Arabic is a language: the language of the Quran and of the Arab world. I didn't like my reaction. Jet-lagged or not, I told myself, I should find the patience to respond gracefully. Then another American Jew asked me to explain the difference between Sunni and Shia Muslims. I told him to ask the internet. I could be nicer, but I don't want to be. I am running low on patience. Political Islam destroyed the Middle East we escaped, and it intends to take over the West where we settled. Every once in a while, a horrific attack makes the news. We watch the culture transform. We watch our backs, and we watch what our children are taught. October 7 was a declaration of war on Western civilization. Yet most people still struggle to understand why the US attacked Iran. They can't connect the dots, not even between Hamas and the IRGC, or between Qatar and progressive students' support for the Palestinian cause. The masses are enchanted, and they are opening the doors to the enemy voluntarily. Across from the Bundestag, a German throws his flag on the ground and raises the Palestinian flag in its place. Across Europe, feminists side with the misogynistic regime in Iran. And in our bastion of freedom, the United States, Mamdani is mayor of New York and El-Sayed has just been elected the first Muslim senator in American history. Many Michigan Jews refused to vote for him. But nearly six in ten of those who voted early still did. Atheists are siding with jihadists. Since October 7, I have spent endless nights in dusty hotels around the world instead of in my comfortable home with my child. We are at war, and I owe him a fight for his future, and for the future of his children and their children. I am doing all I can to share my insights, raise awareness and say out loud what many won't. Including hundreds of hours on planes, in trains, on hair and make up. Trivialities, logistics, emails and comments. So help me, will you? Since we are at war, at least take the time to learn the basics, so you can understand what is happening around us, to us, and ultimately to future generations. Learn about political Islam and its history. Learn about the feud between Sunnis and Shia. Learn what happened in Iran in 1979. Learn about the Jews: their relationship with the Prophet Muhammad, their Temple, their Jerusalem. Learn about Al-Aqsa and why Islamists are obsessed with that mosque. If I couldn't be bothered to learn, I would have supported the Palestinian cause. It's simple, easy, convenient and popular. It's also dangerous, because in the name of the Palestinian cause we will be stripped of basic freedoms you take for granted. Sooner or later, you too will lose the luxury of ignorance. By then, lamenting won't help us much.

MORE BULLSH*T from 2026 Midterm! New Non-Native Texans Who Moved to Lone Star State Were MUCH MORE CONSERVATIVE that Natives – They Weren’t Liberal Voters! | Jim Hoft, The Gateway Pundit There are rumblings online that the shocking and unreal midterm results from Texas can be explained by the non-native Texans who moved to the state from California and other states. Of course, this was a ridiculous argument. For one, if you’re being destroyed financially by radical far-left policies that make energy prices skyrocket, make building anything next to impossible, then you are going to vote for more liberal candidates in your new state. It’s laughable! This never happened. There are even polls that found that new non-native voters in Texas are making the state more conservative, not liberal! Of course! A 2023 survey by Chism Strategies found that new non-native voters in Texas were MORE CONSERVATIVE than native voters! In 2018, exit polls showed Beto O’Rourke beat Ted Cruz among native-born Texans, while Cruz won those born out-of-state by a wide margin. But exit polls can be unreliable, so we decided to poll non-native Texans to see where they stand politically. How we conducted the poll L2, a national voter list, collects data from the National Change of Address (NCOA) database to determine which new registrants have moved across state lines. We used that to pull a sample of Texas voters who—at some point—lived in another state. We then filtered out anyone who said they were born in Texas to find a list of emigrants from other U.S. states. It would have been great to find a list of just California-to-Texas movers, but there were not enough in the database for us to pull a reliable sample. The poll was conducted by sending text messages with a link to an online survey to targeted voters. Responses were weighted by age, ethnicity, gender, and education to match within the voter file for all Texas registered voters who fit the criteria mentioned above. What we found Overall, non-native Texans were much more conservative than the state as a whole, and some moved to Texas explicitly because of its conservative politics. In the 2022 gubernatorial election, new Texans supported Greg Abbott over Beto O’Rourke 47%-34% (12% of those we surveyed did not vote and 6% could not remember who they supported). In a hypothetical 2024 rematch, Donald Trump leads Joe Biden 54%-42% among this cohort. Voters from out West—including California—were the most conservative group, as they supported Trump 64%-32%. Also of note, emigrants from blue states were more Republican (supporting Trump 56%-39%) than those who came to Texas from red states (50% Trump-46% Biden). When asked why they decided to move to Texas, 4.5% of respondents listed the state’s conservative politics as the motivating factor, with no prompting from us. And when asked how the state’s politics impacted their decision, nearly a third of respondents said they were more excited to move here because of Texas’ Republican-controlled state government (compared to just 18% who said it made them hesitant). 40% of respondents said they were more conservative than the average Texan, while 35% said they were more liberal than the average Texan. Only in the Austin metro area did a majority (56%) of respondents say they were more liberal than the average Texan. And despite fears from conservatives that blue staters are trying to import liberal values to the state, only 33% of those we spoke to who moved here from blue states said they were more liberal than the average Texan. Maybe it was the charisma of the “Jesus is trans,” and “God is nonbinary” freak who ran as a Democrat? Again, not likely. This is the bullsh*t that they demand we believe! thegatewaypundit.com/2026/11…

His wife is 65 years 🇺🇸 They have been married for 41 years. As early microchip designers, she reportedly earned more money She totally left engineering work to raise their two children while Jensen Huang built Nvidia from a small start-up. ❤️ She was one of only three women in a class of roughly 250 electrical-engineering students at Oregon State University when she and Jensen met. Jensen was 17 years when he walked up to the 19 year old Lori (his wife) and asked, "Do you want to see my homework?" He promised that if they studied together every Sunday she would get straight A's, turning homework sessions into weekly dates. Around the same time he also told her he would be a CEO by age 30. A promise he kept when he co-founded Nvidia in 1993. Jensen has repeatedly called meeting her "the most important, single event of Oregon university, and of my life" They married in 1985, the same year she graduated with her electrical-engineering degree. Their daughter Madison trained as a chef at the Culinary Institute of America and Le Cordon Bleu in Paris before later joining Nvidia. Their son Spencer ran a cocktail bar in Taipei for years before eventually joining the company as well. She serves as president of the Jen-Hsun and Lori Huang Foundation, which holds tens of millions of Nvidia shares and billions in assets. In 2022 the couple gave $50 million to Oregon State University (the campus where they met) to create a major innovation complex named after both of them. Jensen has said he does "zero percent" of his own shopping and that Lori (with their daughter) chooses his clothes, including the signature black leather jacket. He has publicly credited her with being "part of Nvidia every step of the way" and with handling the personal and financial details of their life. For more than four decades she has kept an almost completely private profile while standing beside the creation of one of the world's most valuable technology companies. . . . . It's quite sad what is happening currently and how shattered Lori Huang must be. For over 40 years, she has kept an incredibly low and private profile, but now she's everywhere on the internet, and it's not for good reasons. She is a heavy philanthropist who left her engineering career to focus on parenting. Jensen Huang even joked that she did 90% of the parenting of their kids. Imagine a woman that was just one out of 3 female students in an engineering class of 247 male students... Now having to leave that engineering career and focus on family. . . Jensen Huang has also taken accountability and responsibility by publicly apologising to his wife in a letter. His wife is 65 years old. Jensen is 63 years old. Contemplating with divorce at this age where they are supposed to be having a smooth retirement together, might be heavy on Lori. I personally feel she's in a situation where no one absolutely wants to be in. Not to mention that it's now public and online strangers will try to shame her for whatever decision she makes, going forward. . . . Overall, I hope their 2 children are okay. Watching mom and dad trend on the internet for these reasons, is definitely not what any child would want. I truly do hope they get the emotional support they need, no matter how old they are. They are still mummy and daddy's boy and girl, and it's going to be heavy on them as well. . . . I wish the family of Huang all the peace and emotional safety that they need, during this hard period. . . Thank you very much for reading 🫂 . . ✍️ Vincent the Therapist

America is a nation at war - but not the type of war most people recognize. No air raids, no tanks, no ground game like we’re used to seeing. And yet this is the biggest war the world has ever known. Those who engineered & financed the first two world wars recognized the limits of conventional conflict & turned instead to unrestricted warfare. Rather than invading with bullets & boots, they went for infiltraton of the education system, media & govt while exploiting technology & systematic ramping up of mass illegal immigration & the dark art of stealing elections. The conversations dominating the news & social media right now would likely not be happening if people inderstood where we really are. When bombs are dropping from the sky & your house is reduced to rubble & flames & you’re searching the wreckage for pieces of those you love, you focus sharply on survival & winning because that is all that matters. Everyone understands the true nature of the threat in moments like that. You don’t have to waste time or energy trying to get people to face reality because we are all living that reality. Petty differences evaporate. Harsh ideological divides disintegrate. We focus where we need to, because failure to do so is counted in terms we cannot escape & we all get it without anyone having to explain anything. In the warfare we know, heroes & cowards are born in plain sight & easy to separate. Traitors can only hide for so long. There is no confusion about gender. And the cost of every decision we make is clear to all. We don’t whine about long days or hard work or taking risks & we don’t worry about what people are going to say about us. We don’t because the cost of not acting is death/defeat & we all know what that means. We don’t lack motivation & we don’t focus all our effort on how we got here. We all know arm chair quarter-having & yelling at the TV are luxuries no one can afford. That time has already passed. We recognize that the fight for survival is not across the ocean in Europe, or somewhere far away. It is right here at our door. And the worst things we can imagine don’t have to be imagined, they are happening all around us. Right now we still have hope that unrestricted warfare means we will be spared the bullets and the bombs. But that’s because we don’t know this beast. It’s not the movie we’ve seen so many times. This performance doesn’t open with the bloodshed - they save it for the final act. The truth is there is no escape. No one gets off scott free. Everyone pays the piper. You may be able to buy time for you & yours, but you cannot run or hide or go along with it for long. This same fight is everywhere. Just look right now at Brazil, Poland, Hungary, Paraguay, Germany, France, South Africa and so on. Same issues. Same ideological architechture. Tactics & strategy align - end goal is the same. So those behind it? Same organizations, same, same money. No one can tell you what you do not want to hear. No eyes can see what is lost to the willfully blind. And more than that, we are out of time. Figure it out - or not. There is only one truth & none of us can alter it.

Funny and sad since it is so true.

Most of our white Christian "thought leaders" in America are not even bright enough to hire and promote other white Christians to sustain their own religion and culture. In other words, they're DEI liberals when it matters. They will not survive the racial tribalism that's been unleashed.

‘Little Rascals’ star resorts to GoFundMe ahead of having 6th child: ‘I really need some help’ trib.al/2qGNkTK