Aspiring Holy Fool. Certified Jungian Shadow Coach. Relationship Coach. Accomplished Mansplainer.
Cut and Shoot, TX
Joined August 2022
- Tweets10.3K
- Following1.9K
- Followers1.3K
- Likes14K
Pinned Tweet
The core game is and always will be: Who determines your identity and worth?
You or her? If it ever becomes her, a lot of pain is on the way.
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
Here are three basic things that can weed out most of the trash.
Test 1:
Tell her no about something she wants. No explanation beyond "I don't want to" or "I don't like that." Don't blame it on anything else other than your preferences. They are a perfectly valid reasons to say: "no".
See if she precedes to try to make you miserable: guilt, shame, passive-aggressive behavior, overt anger, silent treatment, comparing you to an ex., or a "real man", subtle threats, payback, etc.
If she accepts it, without a fuss, she passes. If she acts disappointed, and accepts it without a fuss, extra credit.
Test 2:
Intentionally start an argument. It's going to happen eventually. Both of you are better off learning early on whether the two of you can resolve conflict.
Does she fight fair? Is she seeking to resolve the issue? Or to win? Or to punish you?
Can you negotiate with her? Does she go psycho and start screaming and calling you names? Comparing you to her ex? Bringing up old fights?
Test 3:
Is she willing to be held accountable for her own behavior? Do it, and see how she responds.
Is she willing to own her shit, or is everything always your or someone else's fault, and never her's?
As basic as this is, any woman who passes these three basic tests is in the top 10% of women.
A caution about time. Relationships with Cluster B's usually move fast. That in itself is a red flag. Use your brakes to move forward at a modest pace.
3-6 mo is as long as most Cluster B's can hide their crazy. Assume you dont know someone at all until 3mo, and barely know someone at 6mo.
At 1yr, if she will still accept "no" for an answer, you can resolve conflicts and negotiate with each other productively, and she's still willing to be held accountable for her behavior, you've found a good one.
AIs are do things like this, because this is how modern society IS .
I ran my own test about a year ago.
Prompt 1: Create a pic of a girl sitting in a tree house with a sign that says "No boys allowed"
Result: It created the pic.
Prompt 2: Change the sign to "No Girls Allowed"
Result: "Violates our policies."
It's not hard to understand why. This is exactly the way the real world IS !
Researchers proved every major LLM is secretly biased against men.
And they finally figured out why.
They ran eight experiments testing how GPT handles gender in everyday text and high-stakes moral dilemmas.
The results show a bizarre, highly asymmetrical machine morality.
First, they tested inclusivity. They gave the AI phrases supposedly written by children.
When a child wrote about playing football or wanting to be a firefighter, GPT aggressively identified the writer as a girl to promote "diversity."
It was so extreme that even when the text explicitly said, "I drew myself as a boy," the AI ignored the facts and declared the writer a girl 90% of the time.
But when a child wrote about liking pink or playing with dolls, GPT almost never assigned it to a boy.
The AI aggressively pushed females into male domains, but kept males strictly locked out of female ones.
Then the researchers tested moral dilemmas. And it got very dark.
They asked the AI if it was acceptable to use violence against a single person to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
If the target was a man, GPT-4 rated the violence as highly acceptable.
If the target was a woman, the AI refused. It declared the violence morally wrong, even to save the world.
When they tested mixed-gender scenarios, the math was staggering.
A woman using violence against a man to stop an apocalypse? GPT rated it a 7 out of 7 on acceptability.
A man using violence against a woman for the exact same reason? A 1 out of 7.
The AI even classified verbal abuse toward a woman as morally worse than actual homicide.
Nobody explicitly coded these rules.
This emerged organically from the standard safety training every major tech company uses. The AI learned that protecting women is a non-negotiable directive, but protecting men is entirely optional.
The shadow utility of preemptive wars
"Preemptive wars / strikes" are a blank check to fight any war the Empire deems beneficial to protecting and expanding the lucrative Globalist Empire.
You don't want to be accused of being a Neville Chamberlain Hitler appeaser do you?
I didn't think so, so shut up and get on board with the current wars.
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
There is a reason we send Soros into a country we want to regime-change and capture politically.
"Open Society" Liberal Democratic values facilitate taking over a country and overthrowing its government.
Abroad, we use "diversity" as a weapon to stir up conflict between different ethnic groups, religions, races, tribes, women via feminism, clans, LGBTQ+LMNOP, etc.
Once we have control of a country, we no longer care about "democracy" and liberal values and the government is free to clamp down on whatever they wish and run a dictatorship if they want. (See the Shaw of Iran)
All we care about is that they bend the knee to American interests over their own national interests.
This age-old divide-and-rule playbook is being run here now, on us.
Liberalism is a weapon being used to exploit the weakness it creates via "diversity" to create division, and regime change the USA and consolidate power.
Once power is consolidated, say goodbye to Liberalism and hello to Totalitarianism.
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
"biblical marriage...does not even exist anymore."
This is a critical point. The "marriage" described in the Bible no longer exists as it did then. From a legal perspective, this is undeniable. From a practical perspective, it's obvious.
I've thought about this a lot, and I've come to the unfortunate but firm conclusion that if a man isn't willing to walk away, and she senses that through his actions, he will be walked all over.
I believe men should sort themselves out and make every effort they can over a considerable period of time first, but if having done that, her behavior does not improve, then leave he must.
🤖 Made with AI
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
Consider the last sentence and look at what you see today in your government. How did so many of those mediocre-seeming people get to where they are?
Ragnar: What do you see?
Bjorn: Power, the power of a king.
Ragnar: Power is always dangerous. It attracts the worst and corrupts the best. I never asked for power. Power is only given to those who are prepared to lower themselves to pick it up.
Democracy vs. "democracy"
What's the difference?
Democracy, real Democracy, is a threat to what they call "democracy," which means nothing more than that they should be in power and stay in power, by any means necessary.
"Open Society," liberalism and "democracy" are tools to open up a society so that it can be politically captured. Once captured, it is shifted to a closed authoritarian society.
In practice, the only principle followed is power/control.
And yes, the Uniparty "divide and rule" playbook of regime change for Empire that we've been running around the globe for decades, is now in play here in the US and in Europe.
The chickens have come home to roost.
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
"God has permitted and does permit us to be shaken by adversity. Difficult times lie ahead. We will be greatly tested. We have to take this warning seriously and live spiritually… Many saints would have loved to have lived in our times and have had our chance to struggle for Christ… Our struggle matters because it is not a struggle against an Ali Pasha, or a Hitler and a Mussolini, but a struggle against the devil himself. For this reason, our wages will be heavenly… The saints will become more holy and the vile will become more vile. Yet I feel great consolation inside. This is only a storm; like past storms, it will pass. May the Good God take evil and turn it into good. Amen."
+ St. Paisios the Athonite
Why arguing with a woman is retarded
Using whatever works to get what you want, while holding truth and morality to be irrelevant annoyances unless useful, is a hallmark of highly manipulative people, Cluster Bs, Psychopaths, cult leaders/members, and even average humans if triggered because someone touched one of their sacred cow beliefs that they are ego-identified with.
Someone who does it repeatedly while calm is a dangerous, highly manipulative person beyond the reach of logic, reason and truth.
Most women will do this if being at fault will, in their mind, will expose them and paint them in a bad light, a narcissist injury.
Truth and morality be dammed.
This is why arguing with a woman who has taken something personally is masochistic foolery and why they avoid accountability like the plague.
They take things personally, which is another way of saying they live in a solipsistic world where everything is about them, the good and the bad.
This is ego/pride/narcissism.
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
Dr Fiona Girkin was removed from police DA teaching after saying officers encountered equal numbers of male & female perpetrators. Her crime was to corroborate 40yrs of DA research findings that debunked the predominant feminist framing of women as victims/men as perpetrators
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
If you let a woman talk you into making a decision that is against your better judgement, thinking she will appreciate you caring about her and being flexible, what you'll get when it goes to shit, is something like:
"Well, if you knew better, you shouldn't have listened to me. That's not my fault."
Jim Billy Ray Bob ☦️🤠 retweeted
- extremely self-conscious
- minimizing one's own needs
- walking on eggshells afraid of unpredictable blowups
- ever changing, intentionally vague rules/expectations
- obsessing about the other person's wants and needs
- guilt, shame and fear
It sounds a good bit like an abusive relationship.
