Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1) profile picture

SFUSD parent, startup technologist. Interested in politics, software, networks, and community. Former Idahoan.

San Francisco, CA
Joined June 2018
Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)Photo by Jonathan Claybaugh (@JonathanClayba1)
Jonathan Claybaugh retweeted
Microsoft364
444
15,833
987
76,861
2,653,646
Jonathan Claybaugh retweeted
Nah, I hate the version of socialism that is explained to me by the socialists themselves. 1. They can't explain the most basic, core elements of how their economic system would actually function in a real-world setting. Their vision gets incredibly convoluted and foggy when you introduce anything beyond the purest form of industrial workplace co-ownership, like contracting temporary specialized labor. 2. Socialists handwave the obvious knock-on effects of their system, like lack of outside investment or fiduciary responsibility brutalizing a nation's ability to dynamically allocate resources or develop innovative technologies with large up-front costs and no guarantees of future profits. Oftentimes they will just end up re-inventing capitalism, but with extra steps, to solve these problems. 3. More often than not, socialist "ideas" or "policies" are just vague, meaningless truisms that literally anybody would agree with (everyone should be able to afford healthcare, housing, groceries etc.) while also claiming socialism is the only conceivable method of achieving these ends, despite zero real-world cases to support this claim (and countless cases to the contrary). 4. Socialists will openly own the fact that any "counter-revolutionaries" who don't buy into their ideology cannot be allowed to exist within their society and will either be forcibly re-educated, thrown in a gulag, or killed. They know their system can't even theoretically function in anything beyond a totalitarian, single-party state where adherence to their ideology is compulsary. Socialists have no real plans and no real solutions. Their ideology collapses under a feather's weight in scrutiny, and so they end up just avoiding any scrutiny at all, while forcefully encouraging their peers to do the same. Socialism/communism/leftism is nothing more than an idealistic aesthetic being sold to the politically illiterate, much like fascism. And, exactly like fascism, the ideology grants a false sense of moral superiority to those who buy into it, and anyone who falls short of total ideological alignment is viewed as a mortal enemy who must be destroyed at any cost to forward the mission. Of course, for most Americans who are warm on "socialism", their only concept of socialism is "free healthcare, reduced wealth disparity, cheaper housing" -- ideas that have nothing to do with socialism and which liberals in our capitalist society already unanimously support. They don't recognize they are being taken for fools by actual socialists who want to fundamentally restructure their society in the shittiest ways imaginable.
You don’t hate socialism. You hate the version that was explained to you by someone who owns 4 houses and 3 yachts
60
283
17
1,884
46,890
If we let the DSA take over the DNC, expect the exact same fate MAGA is having now. Expect us to lose several senate seats and house seats. Expect us to lose our majorities by massive numbers. That’s what happens when you let your radical flank control your party.
44
122
5
638
20,212
Jonathan Claybaugh retweeted
Last week's blue wave was powered by moderates, not progressives per @TheEconomist
166
803
107
3,982
161,787
Local leftist making fun of learning loss during COVID and SFUSD's late re-opening impacting those who need specialized instruction (like my kid) and the disadvantaged the most. Timing article documenting the impact: sfstandard.com/2026/11/09/sf…
Replying to @JonathanClayba1
Bro is still mad about spending some extra time with his kid(s) five years ago.
5
197
Of all the post election tweets I have seen trying to explain why the SF left keeps losing elections, it’s this one. (Screenshot because this account blocked me because of good faith debate)
8
2
65
1,940
Good governance and pro strong-mayor Measure EE is passing in Oakland at 73%, championed by progressive Mayor Barbara Lee. Oakland also has a 10% threshold of voters to get propositions on the local ballot (15% for charter amendments) vs San Francisco's more permissive 8% (1/2)
2
2
4
925
and SF's 8% *includes* charter amendments. So it's way harder to get ballot initiatives in Oakland and their voters who re-elected Lee by 85% are approving of strong mayor reforms yet I don't hear criticism of her for the same reform issues that Lurie is pushing in SF.
1
4
241
I understand many on the far left in SF are upset about Lurie and Weiner. You all ran Peskin and Chan as opponents. People want housing, and they want well running government. NY and LA left-leaning Mayors offer this and got elected. The lesson here should be obvious… (1/2)
9
16
2
642
56,300
Find better candidates that look forward, not backward. Loving cars in parks and fighting housing production does not win in the 2020s. SF has not moved to the right, it’s that your candidates have been awful or very unpopular (Breed).
7
2
329
7,921
Prop 40 failed because it is bad policy, was poorly written (allowing the legislature to update the terms) and had no legal enforcement of being a "one time" tax. Texas showed us money can't buy elections and voters are not stupid. sfchronicle.com/politics/joe…
2
3
28
701
Replying to @DanWheeler4SF
@DanWheeler4SF blocked me so I gotta screenshot this banger from him yesterday. He asks if there is a more evil politician than Scott Weiner. This is coming from someone ride or die for Connie Chan and progressive messaging. So if you think SCOTT is more evil than Trump..
2
2
135
I really don't know what to say except it's this derangement that is why the SF far left has lost election, after election, after election. People like this are literally disconnected from reality.
1
16
Poor @DanWheeler4SF doesn't like being called out for his "guarantee" that Chan would win the election. Poor sport really. If you are going to make election predictions like that, and miss so widely, you are due a little jesting - would go for myself included!
12
334
"Wiener will not win the general election. I guarantee it." Do I get any money back from reading through the months and months of unhinged tweets?
unavailable
7
307
This didn't quite work out as they expected.
connie chan will demolish your ass you fascist zionist fool
5
175
UESF's slate for the SF Board of Education is not going to get a single candidate across the line. Thank goodness.
1
2
26
930
Credit where credit is due. Current D10 Supervisor Walton is on the Bay Area Air District board and is fighting against the utterly stupid gas heater ban that will 1000% negatively impact poor and elderly home owners. Not a fan of his otherwise, but here a big thumbs up
1
6
229
If you want to understand why SF leftists keep losing the majority of causes and candidates in their elections it’s because they are so far down the rabbit hole they think the Great Highway issue is a grand conspiracy theory. You can’t make this stuff up.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
116
It always amazes me how the local left (in this case an extremely ideological non-profit) refuses to embrace good governance reforms. Voters understand the need. Lurie isn't winning because people like billionaires, it's because people like his IDEAS.
8
232