Jonathan Claybaugh retweeted
Nah, I hate the version of socialism that is explained to me by the socialists themselves.
1. They can't explain the most basic, core elements of how their economic system would actually function in a real-world setting. Their vision gets incredibly convoluted and foggy when you introduce anything beyond the purest form of industrial workplace co-ownership, like contracting temporary specialized labor.
2. Socialists handwave the obvious knock-on effects of their system, like lack of outside investment or fiduciary responsibility brutalizing a nation's ability to dynamically allocate resources or develop innovative technologies with large up-front costs and no guarantees of future profits. Oftentimes they will just end up re-inventing capitalism, but with extra steps, to solve these problems.
3. More often than not, socialist "ideas" or "policies" are just vague, meaningless truisms that literally anybody would agree with (everyone should be able to afford healthcare, housing, groceries etc.) while also claiming socialism is the only conceivable method of achieving these ends, despite zero real-world cases to support this claim (and countless cases to the contrary).
4. Socialists will openly own the fact that any "counter-revolutionaries" who don't buy into their ideology cannot be allowed to exist within their society and will either be forcibly re-educated, thrown in a gulag, or killed. They know their system can't even theoretically function in anything beyond a totalitarian, single-party state where adherence to their ideology is compulsary.
Socialists have no real plans and no real solutions. Their ideology collapses under a feather's weight in scrutiny, and so they end up just avoiding any scrutiny at all, while forcefully encouraging their peers to do the same. Socialism/communism/leftism is nothing more than an idealistic aesthetic being sold to the politically illiterate, much like fascism. And, exactly like fascism, the ideology grants a false sense of moral superiority to those who buy into it, and anyone who falls short of total ideological alignment is viewed as a mortal enemy who must be destroyed at any cost to forward the mission.
Of course, for most Americans who are warm on "socialism", their only concept of socialism is "free healthcare, reduced wealth disparity, cheaper housing" -- ideas that have nothing to do with socialism and which liberals in our capitalist society already unanimously support. They don't recognize they are being taken for fools by actual socialists who want to fundamentally restructure their society in the shittiest ways imaginable.
Jonathan Claybaugh retweeted
If we let the DSA take over the DNC, expect the exact same fate MAGA is having now.
Expect us to lose several senate seats and house seats. Expect us to lose our majorities by massive numbers.
That’s what happens when you let your radical flank control your party.
Jonathan Claybaugh retweeted
Last week's blue wave was powered by moderates, not progressives per @TheEconomist
Local leftist making fun of learning loss during COVID and SFUSD's late re-opening impacting those who need specialized instruction (like my kid) and the disadvantaged the most. Timing article documenting the impact: sfstandard.com/2026/11/09/sf…
Replying to @JonathanClayba1
Bro is still mad about spending some extra time with his kid(s) five years ago.
5
197
Of all the post election tweets I have seen trying to explain why the SF left keeps losing elections, it’s this one. (Screenshot because this account blocked me because of good faith debate)
Good governance and pro strong-mayor Measure EE is passing in Oakland at 73%, championed by progressive Mayor Barbara Lee. Oakland also has a 10% threshold of voters to get propositions on the local ballot (15% for charter amendments) vs San Francisco's more permissive 8% (1/2)
I understand many on the far left in SF are upset about Lurie and Weiner. You all ran Peskin and Chan as opponents. People want housing, and they want well running government. NY and LA left-leaning Mayors offer this and got elected. The lesson here should be obvious… (1/2)
Prop 40 failed because it is bad policy, was poorly written (allowing the legislature to update the terms) and had no legal enforcement of being a "one time" tax. Texas showed us money can't buy elections and voters are not stupid. sfchronicle.com/politics/joe…
Replying to @DanWheeler4SF
@DanWheeler4SF blocked me so I gotta screenshot this banger from him yesterday. He asks if there is a more evil politician than Scott Weiner. This is coming from someone ride or die for Connie Chan and progressive messaging. So if you think SCOTT is more evil than Trump..
2
2
135
Poor @DanWheeler4SF doesn't like being called out for his "guarantee" that Chan would win the election. Poor sport really. If you are going to make election predictions like that, and miss so widely, you are due a little jesting - would go for myself included!
12
334
"Wiener will not win the general election. I guarantee it." Do I get any money back from reading through the months and months of unhinged tweets?
unavailable
7
307
UESF's slate for the SF Board of Education is not going to get a single candidate across the line. Thank goodness.
Credit where credit is due. Current D10 Supervisor Walton is on the Bay Area Air District board and is fighting against the utterly stupid gas heater ban that will 1000% negatively impact poor and elderly home owners. Not a fan of his otherwise, but here a big thumbs up
1
6
229
Article: sfchronicle.com/bayarea/arti…
55
If you want to understand why SF leftists keep losing the majority of causes and candidates in their elections it’s because they are so far down the rabbit hole they think the Great Highway issue is a grand conspiracy theory. You can’t make this stuff up.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
116
It always amazes me how the local left (in this case an extremely ideological non-profit) refuses to embrace good governance reforms. Voters understand the need. Lurie isn't winning because people like billionaires, it's because people like his IDEAS.
San Francisco elections:
Now were *all* in the "March for Billionaires."
@esksf on San Francisco's doubling down on its new Gilded Age as the nation sweeps left.
missionlocal.org/2026/11/san…
8
232













