Sydney native 🇦🇺. Assistant Professor of Political Science at @UArkansas. @UMich PhD. Political psych, disability, experiments.

Ann Arbor, MI
Joined June 2011
Absolutely delighted to announce that I will be joining @UArkansas as Assistant Professor of Public Opinion in Fall 2025. Feeling very grateful for this opportunity and excited to begin work with colleagues at @UARKplsc in beautiful Fayetteville!
13
1
117
7,496
Caitlin nails it again. Huge denominator problem in this discourse. Everyone needs to stop generalising about categories of people from unbelievably rare, aberrant behaviours.
Roiling under the Lindsey Clancy discourse is an idea that should stop us short: Women should not be trusted with their own children.
1
115
Political Science @UArkansas is hiring four (4!!) TT positions. I've been an AP here for just over a year now and have absolutely loved it. Great students, collegial department, and a beautiful part of the country. Happy to chat with potential candidates.
We are hiring 4 TT APs. See the links below for more info. Looking forward to your applications! Public Administration: uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/… Public Law: uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/… CP/IR (Populism): uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/… CP/IR (NGOs/MENA): uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/…
2
6
384
These kinds of basic procedural conflicts are so prevalent in peer review and there is no reason for it. How is an editor not automatically recused if a critique or replication of their work is the subject of the paper under review? You can’t just hope virtue will prevail.
Replying to @albouy
As for Acemoglu, I tried to make peace. But i still remember in 2007 after my R&R at the AER, I submitted a paper to REStat where Acemoglu was editor, trusting that he’d recuse himself and not handle it. A few months later, I got a rejection letter signed by Acemoglu.
4
502
Absolutely delighted and honored that my dissertation, “Body Politic: Disability and Political Cohesion,” has been awarded Best Dissertation by the Political Psychology Section of @APSAtweets.
1
1
104
I am so grateful to the awards committee for this honor, and I am deeply indebted to my incredible committee - especially my chair, Vince Hutchings - for their constant support and guidance.
1
42
In my experience, the true greats are often great in character as well as intellect, productivity. Not always (obviously), but often.
I never met Gordon Wood, but I have a story about him. In one of my grad school seminars, we read Wood’s Creation of the American Republic. The sheer erudition and evidentiary depth of the book bowled me over. Back then, before kids and before life accelerated to warp speed, I used to call my mother every Sunday to catch up. Lots of times, we ended up talking about what I was reading that week in my grad seminars or for leisure. Mom had an omnivorous mind, and she was always looking for something else to read. She was a true intellectual—curious about almost everything, always eager to integrate new arguments or ideas into her existing schemas of how the world worked or to have those schemas challenged and changed. When we talked that particular Sunday, I think I tried to describe to her part of Wood’s argument about the relationship between the state constitutions during the Articles of Confederation era and the federal Constitution. Maybe I was tired, maybe I didn’t completely understand her questions, but the end result of the conversation was that Mom had questions about Wood’s argument that I didn’t answer satisfactorily. I told her that she should probably just read the book, and we said goodbye. She did eventually read the book, but the next Sunday, Mom started our conversation by saying, “Well, I had a lovely conversation with Gordon Wood this week.” For a split second, I thought she was joking, but then I remembered who I was dealing with. I started to sweat. “How?” I asked. A whole variety of unlikely scenarios in which the foremost historian of the American Revolution and my mother, who lived in Wichita, Kansas, might have met ran through my mind. “Oh, I just looked up his office phone number on Brown’s website and called, and he picked up!” Mom said. I decided I would have to find another profession. As it ended up, Gordon Wood spent about an hour on the phone with my mother answering her questions about the Constitution. Ever since, I’ve had a soft spot for the man when I imagine him picking up the phone in Providence and finding Becky Elder from Wichita on the other end of the line. His generosity in that moment spoke very well of him. Rest in peace, professor.
41
Josh Thorp retweeted
NEW in @ScienceAdvances, after 3 years of work with a great team: We review and meta-analyze 100 immigrant conjoint experiments in 36 countries. Immigration preferences are surprisingly similar across people and countries, but changing over time and structured by politics. 🧵
2
42
6
157
40,806
There's a big difference between identifying as disabled - i.e., embrace of disability as pary of my self-concept - and accessing disability accomms. The latter does not require the former. The definition of disability hasn't changed - most don't socially identify as disabled.
Replying to @slooterman
Some of them are obviously gaming the system. But there's also diagnostic creep; we've reframed "disability" to mean mild weaknesses. I'm sure I'd have an IEP if I were in school now for ADHD/executive function problems. But was I too disabled to succeed w/o accomodations? No.
2
90
As scary as this moment is, remember that support for political violence went DOWN after the July 2024 assassination attempt against Trump, not up pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pna… We need to make the same thing happen this time.
Careful polling shows that Americans overwhelmingly reject political violence - see e.g. brightlinewatch.org/tempered…, brightlinewatch.org/accelera…, and pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pna…. Unfortunately, it only takes one person with a gun to create a tragedy like what've seen today.
3
30
84
26,256
The narrative that political violence has broad support from either party is factually wrong and dangerous. It risks giving isolated actors the false mandate they crave. The American public overwhelmingly rejects violence. We must not amplify the fringe by misrepresenting them as a movement.
It’s not gun violence. It’s Democrat violence.
29
85
12,510
I find claims like this bizarre. You may not like evolutionary psychology, but if you accept that human organisms are subject to evolutionary pressures, the onus is on you to explain why the forces that made human brains have no impact on human psychology.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
2
341
Interesting challenge to the Brewer model of intergroup attitudes.
Important new study: Posts about political opponents that involve "dunking" on them, mocking them, and denigrating them are much more likely to be shared than posts about in-group positivity, pride, and love. @steverathje2 @jayvanbavel pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.20…
1
303
#OpenAccess from @JEPS_ed - Vulnerability Appeals in the #COVID19 Pandemic: Insights from a National Survey Experiment - cup.org/3Ax3sgN - @Jaclarner & @JoshuaThorp #FirstView
1
3
891
Delighted to learn that my paper with @Jaclarner is out today at @JEPS_ed! Throughout the COVID19 pandemic, governments sought to increase compliance by emphasizing the vulnerability of minority groups to severe illness/death...1/n🧵 cambridge.org/core/journals/…
1
3
9
644
We also address several caveats. Notably, we ran this study when daily cases were on the downswing and several restrictions had recently been lifted. We may have seen different results in Dec '21, when cases were surging and threat was high.
1
1
236
Plenty of more work to do on these kinds of appeals in different political contexts. We are grateful to the reviewers and especially to @bnbakker for outstanding editorial work. All feedback is welcome!
1
1
150