SEX 🧬 GENDER IDENTITY 🤡 MAN 🤷‍♂️ WOMAN 🤷‍♀️ The SEX Discrimination Act doesn’t define “sex.” It doesn’t define “gender identity”. It doesn’t define “man.” It doesn’t define “woman.” And these words with NO definition is the guiding legislation for human rights in Australia. 🤯 The result is pure clown-world theatre. 🤡 Parliamentarians and the Sex Discrimination Commissioner perform genuine confusion at the words “biological man” and “biological woman.” Senator Ellie Whiteaker scoffs and asks what the term “biological woman” means? Anna Cody @AusHumanRights claimed to not understand the term “biological men.” 🤦‍♀️ If the Sex Discrimination Act cannot tell the difference between a woman and a man who says he is a woman, it cannot protect women. That is not inclusion. That is the erasure of sex-based rights by deliberate refusal to define the terms. 🙅‍♀️🙅‍♀️ Women no longer have an unambiguous legal right to single-sex spaces, services or sports and objecting can itself be framed as unlawful discrimination. The undefined words aren’t a loophole. They are the policy. And when asked whether the government will fix any of this, Minister for Women @SenKatyG was crystal clear: no. No definitions of man, woman or sex will be restored. The deliberate 2013 deletion stands. 😤 WRNA is calling for the Sex Discrimination Act to be amended so that “sex” means biological sex, “woman” means adult human female, and single-sex provisions actually mean single-sex. Until that happens, women will keep being told that basic biology is a “ridiculous question”. #FixTheSDA 💜🤍💚