Nemo sum
Somewhere
Joined March 2022
- Tweets81.9K
- Following3.3K
- Followers4.5K
- Likes254K
Pinned Tweet
Russian information operations are often misunderstood as simply "pro-Russia propaganda".
Modern Kremlin-linked influence campaigns are usually less about persuading people to support Russia directly, and more about weakening social cohesion inside rival societies.
The objective is fragmentation:
• reduce trust in institutions
• increase hostility between and within groups
• amplify cynicism
• exhaust democratic consensus
• and turn political disagreement into identity warfare
Importantly, these operations rarely invent divisions from nothing.
They exploit fractures that already exist.
EU vs Disinfo overview: euvsdisinfo.eu/?utm_source=c…
EEAS overview of Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI): eeas.europa.eu/eeas/informat…
RAND’s Firehose of Falsehood model: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fireho…
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
Listening to Trump's own words, it all makes sense: without fail, every MAGA-Republican convention ends with Grindr crashing.
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
A detailed timeline by @RyanMcbeth on how Elon Musk has repeatedly been guided by the Kremlin as to what Starlink will be allowed to do.
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
❗️ Claims that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy allegedly purchased a private nuclear bunker in Nova Scotia, Canada, for $42 million are fake.
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
Russian disinformation networks are currently blitzing their social media and their controlled outlets with "The Kremlin is ready for peace", with Putin presented as a peacemaker.
On October 27, approximately 8,900 materials mentioning Ukraine were published on about 238 resources involved in information manipulation and interference. Of these, approximately 868 texts promoted the image of Putin as a "leader open to dialogue."
🔹 The main news item was the statements by the President of Finland, Alexander Stubb, regarding the transmission of messages from the Ukrainian side to Moscow through the mediation of Finland and Norway. Based on this, Russian resources disseminated publications that create the image of Putin as a supposedly constructive participant in negotiations.
🔹 The manipulation lies in the fact that propagandists present diplomatic mediation as a personal achievement of the Kremlin. They emphasize the length of the phone conversation and possible compromises regarding energy and infrastructure, while concealing the coordination of negotiation parameters with Ukraine and the United States.
🔹 The goal of the information interference is to legitimize Putin on the international stage and to impose on the Western audience the idea of the necessity of direct negotiations on terms dictated by Russia. In this way, propaganda is trying to shift attention away from Russian aggression and towards Moscow's supposed "flexibility."
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
Trump and co value money more than life something that leaves them in a weak position.
Content of Tense Conversation Between Budanov and Trump's Team Revealed
Negotiations between the Ukrainian delegation and Donald Trump's special envoys in Miami, as reported by Le Monde, escalated into a conflict. According to the publication, during a three-hour meeting at the Shell Bay golf club, Steve Witkoff "with irritation" demanded that Kyrylo Budanov, head of Zelenskyy's office, cease strikes on Russian oil refineries.
Budanov, per Le Monde's information, "barely contained his anger" and felt that he was being "treated like a child, trying to teach him how to make money." The Americans presented an ambitious plan for postwar "regional prosperity," which envisioned resuming the transit of Russian oil and gas to Europe through Ukraine, with dividends paid to Kyiv.
Budanov was outraged that such a deal would tie Ukraine to Moscow, after which the negotiations broke off. When the meeting resumed, the Americans proposed accepting a deal for supplies of Russian diesel to the United States.
The publication's sources noted that they had never seen Ukrainians "so upset and alarmed." Zelenskyy's entourage described the situation as "hopeless," since Trump's envoys "think only about business."
📸: Press service of the President of Ukraine
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
The Wh**e House mistook men for whores, with predictable results.
Content of Tense Conversation Between Budanov and Trump's Team Revealed
Negotiations between the Ukrainian delegation and Donald Trump's special envoys in Miami, as reported by Le Monde, escalated into a conflict. According to the publication, during a three-hour meeting at the Shell Bay golf club, Steve Witkoff "with irritation" demanded that Kyrylo Budanov, head of Zelenskyy's office, cease strikes on Russian oil refineries.
Budanov, per Le Monde's information, "barely contained his anger" and felt that he was being "treated like a child, trying to teach him how to make money." The Americans presented an ambitious plan for postwar "regional prosperity," which envisioned resuming the transit of Russian oil and gas to Europe through Ukraine, with dividends paid to Kyiv.
Budanov was outraged that such a deal would tie Ukraine to Moscow, after which the negotiations broke off. When the meeting resumed, the Americans proposed accepting a deal for supplies of Russian diesel to the United States.
The publication's sources noted that they had never seen Ukrainians "so upset and alarmed." Zelenskyy's entourage described the situation as "hopeless," since Trump's envoys "think only about business."
📸: Press service of the President of Ukraine
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
Everyone agrees and the best part is that both Russians and Ukrainians agree on it too, Trump sucks.....
Saab-rina 900 Turbo Car-penter 🏴☠️ retweeted
More Musk and Russia and now deeply embedded at DIA. We've hit a new low that demonstrates the level of corruption, capture, and a complete collapse of standards at our military institutions under this administration. I honestly can't believe it. So here you go-
In the thread below, our parallel orbital models prove (at 99.89% to 99.98% probability) that SpaceX colluded with Russia on the October 15-18 intercept of U.S.-licensed spy satellite ICEYE-X36. Now look at the new DIA space report (Challenges to Security in Space 2026) that **suddenly** dropped yesterday. It comes nowhere near the historical standard of the Defense Intelligence Agency. It's AI-generated slop in which they cite the BBC, TASS, and Russian propaganda blog topwar.ru multiple times to run cover for Elon Musk!!!! WHAT!!!
These are just a few of the flaws that were easy to spot from our research, and they show how this cover-up was engineered:
1. Citing Russian Propaganda Site topwar.ru as "Defense Intelligence" to Fake Russian Capability: Our orbital models below (built from Space Force 18th/19th SDS GP element sets and IAU SatChecker archives) prove that Russia's ground radars are physically blind to ICEYE-X36 at 541 km for 8 to 10 hours a day due to Earth's curvature, and that COSMOS 2612 could only pull off its 14.3x blind sprint because SpaceX pinned ICEYE-X36 in place with a false 0.401 km STARLINK-35856 collision alert (while SpaceX's internal v3/v4 ephemerides showed a safe 1.925 to 2.003 km pass). Instead of Space Force telemetry, DIA's report reads like an LLM summary of news clips that cites Russian propaganda site en.topwar.ru multiple times ("forces include Starlink terminals") alongside TASS to puff up Russia's ground-based Krona surveillance complex as if Russia could track the intercept on its own!
2. Timed to Launder Musk's Oct 26 Alibi: After his first 3 excuses for throttling Ukraine's military Starshield links collapsed, Musk pivoted to Alibi #4 yesterday on X (claiming he had to throttle Ukraine because Russia designated Starlink a target and would blow up satellites, creating an orbital debris catastrophe). Hours later, DIA drops this PDF using those exact topwar.ru footnotes to validate Musk's script on Russian retaliation against commercial constellations and LEO debris, while blaming Operation Epic Fury drone failures in Iran on "Iranian jamming" instead of Musk's ToS hold-up and 5x LUCAS drone price hike ($5k to $25k/mo).
3. The Rigged "July 2026" Cutoff to Erase the Crime Scene: DIA arbitrarily froze the report's cutoff in July 2026 so it could omit the Aug 2026 SBU discovery of 27 Russian-registered Starlink terminals, omit SpaceX onboarding Chinese operators into Stargaze (Oct 6/16), and erase SpaceX's synchronized October pincer (throttling Starshield on the ground Oct 13-14 while pinning ICEYE-X36 in orbit Oct 15-16 for Russia's COSMOS 2612), even after the State Dept formally called out COSMOS 2612 for on-orbit weapon behavior at the UN on Oct 21!
4. Who Captured the DIA: Last August, Hegseth fired career 3-star DIA Director Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse for refusing to cook Iran assessments. In Feb 2026, Hegseth installed a Marine budget general with zero intelligence background (Lt. Gen. James Adams), overseen by Under Secretary of War for Intelligence Bradley Hansell, a former Partner at SpaceX-investor Outlander VC who still holds an Outlander LP stake on his OGE financial disclosure.
They purged the career intelligence leadership, wired Grok into Pentagon networks, and reduced the DIA to publishing topwar.ru-sourced cover stories for Musk. Excuse me for being blunt but just WTAF is going on!?
FINAL: SpaceX Blocked A U.S. And NATO Satellite to Assist a Russian Intercept After Crippling Ukraine's Air Defenses
New 5-page institutional brief & 60s 3D SGP4 orbital reconstruction with Craig Pirrong, Ph.D. @streetwiseprof | Data & Forensics: RAB @LibertyLynx
Pages 1-3 & 3D animation below; Pages 4-5 in Post 2; full 5-page PDF link in Post 3 🧵👇
As Craig Pirrong's counterfactual framework establishes: The Russian intercept is not the smoking gun. The failure to maneuver is.
1. The Sprinting Satellite Paradox & -96.64% Target Freeze (Page 1): Between Oct 13 and 24, 2026, Russian counterspace weapon COSMOS 2612 (68762) converted a 5-month, ~170 m/s co-planar trailing option into a 0.759 km sub-kilometer hold against U.S.-licensed radar satellite ICEYE-X36 (59103), which guides Ukraine's autonomous deep strikes on Russian oil refineries without SpaceX links, at the exact moment SpaceX throttled Ukrainian military Starshield terminals (-23.0% USF air-defense hits).
In June 2026 (with no Starlink alert), ICEYE-X36 defeated a Russian approach by dropping 0.500 km, generating 71.08 km/day secular drift (3.62 km/h in the sprint frame), exiting Russia's 3.0 km braking box in 49.7 to 60.78 minutes, blowing past Russia's 12 km or under onboard KTZ sensor in 3.31 hours, and causing a 103.7 to 118.5 km miss.
In October, as COSMOS 2612 fired a -2.2184 km (370.8x perched shock / 449.1x fit jump) burn to sprint 14.29x faster (400 km/day / 278 m/min), ICEYE-X36's evasion collapsed by 96.64% (to 16.8154 meters or less, P3 = 3.363%).
* Why? The Alert Itself Was the Weapon: SpaceX maintained a 0.401 km (0.711 km Oct 16) public GP collision alert via STARLINK-35856 (67013) despite holding internal v3/v4 forecasts 4.80x to 5.00x wider (1.925 to 2.003 km) and withholding autonomous Starlink clearance (M_Starlink = 0, W_X36 = 1, W_COSMOS = 0), legally freezing X36 under David Goldman's 2023 FCC Condition 16 (DA 23-797).
* Rational Russian exercise across a 363.7 km blind gap required ex-ante certainty of K = (E1, E2, E3). Across all 5 capability levers, SpaceX is the sole actor (N = 1): Posterior = 99.893% to 99.978% (Tier A floor; 1 in 3,748 to 17,841) and up to 99.999% (Tier B K-set).
2. Four-Way Tracker Blindness & What NRO/USSF Saw Live (Page 2):
* Public Catalogs (18th/19th SDS): Blind for 21.824 hours (363.7 km unobserved closure) on sprint (k6 to k7) and 19.385 hours on brake (k9 to k10, -382.71 km SGP4 delta).
* Russian Ground Radars (SKKP Krona/Okno): Bounded by Earth curvature at 541 km to a 22.8 degree (2,530 km) horizon cone, blind for 8 to 10 hours/day (80% to 94.5% of the orbit) with zero Americas/Pacific coverage.
* The Sole Unblinded Commercial Panopticon: Only SpaceX's Stargaze (31,000 star trackers, 40M+ daily tracks, 17M associated, 850 sightings/day, 7 to 15 min global custody / 99.73% 10-min hit rate) and sub-1-minute Space Safety portal (Appendix A & Section 4(b), with Chinese operators onboarded Oct 6 & 16) had real-time visibility across the blind gap, while NRO & USSF watch floors watched live on the classified High Accuracy Catalog (HAC / Space Fence / Vantor WorldView NEI), realizing 348 Starshield satellites in orbit (245 NRO spy satellites) sit on the same SpaceX bus.
3. Contracted Capacity Is Not Combat Availability & The 6-Way C2 Collapse (Page 3):
* Combat Output = Sensor Availability x Link Availability x Platform Availability x Permission Arriving Before Mission Window Closes (T_permission <= T_mission).
* The Two-Pronged Pincer: SpaceX weaponized FCC Condition 16 to freeze the Sensor Layer in orbit and a Commercial ToS ($500 liability cap) to blind the Transport Layer on the ground.
* 70-90 km/h Civilian Baseline vs. 4 Collapsed Alibis: Civilian Starlink in Ukraine was already capped at 70 to 90 km/h since Feb 2026 (S. Beskrestnov). The Oct 13-24 101 to 161 km/h gate hit DoD-contracted military Starshield links (-23.0% USF hits; Oct 19 Nova Vodolaha strike). Musk cycled through 4 contradicting alibis in 12 days (blaming DoD/POTUS Oct 14 -> ToS offensive loophole Oct 24 -> "sympathy for poor Russian conscripts" Oct 25 -> Russian ASAT/debris fear Oct 26), while resolving the exact same "weapon ToS" objection on U.S. LUCAS suicide drones in Iran via a 5x price hike ($5,000 to $25,000/mo)!
* COCO vs. GOGO ($8.8B+ Sign-Off Chain): Under Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated (COCO/OTA) deals signed off by Pete Hegseth, Stephen Feinberg, CTO Emil Michael, Lt. Gen. Philip Garrant, Gen. Michael Guetlein, Col. Ryan Frazier, Clare Hopper & NRO's Dr. Chris Scolese, taxpayers fund the satellites while SpaceX's civilian NOC retains 100% of the physical thruster and velocity kill-switches.
(Continued in Post 2: Pages 4 & 5: Statutory Breach Matrix, CTO Emil Michael's $7M-$35M OGE Clock, the $19.5B SpaceX Bailout Loop, Iran Round Two Magazine Depletion & Subpoena Schedule. Full PDF link in Post 3 👇) $SPCX $TSLA
THE DARK INFRASTRUCTURE OF X
Child sexual exploitation, AI-generated abuse, pornography spam and the networks behind them
1/12 - The problem isn't just the content. It's the infrastructure distributing it.
For years, social-media platforms have approached illegal material largely as a problem of individual posts and offending accounts.
But what happens when the accounts uploading child sexual abuse material are only one part of a much larger distribution network?
What happens when other accounts advertise links in the replies, bots repost the material, fake profiles attract audiences, and suspended accounts are rapidly replaced?
And what happens when the same commercial infrastructure used for pornography spam and fraudulent identities is also used to manipulate political discussions?
These are not entirely separate questions.
Investigations by child-protection organisations, independent researchers and NATO-affiliated specialists provide important evidence about how these systems operate.
Having spent years investigating and reporting harmful material on X, I believe we need to examine the networks behind the content, not merely the posts appearing on our screens.
11/12 - Prevention, specialist moderation and effective separation of adult content
X needs several safeguards operating together.
First, sexual images and videos should undergo automated safety screening before public distribution, with reliable detection of known illegal material and specialist review of uncertain high-risk cases.
Second, the system should examine relevant text, links and account behaviour rather than relying solely on image recognition.
Third, X needs sufficiently staffed human moderation teams with specialist knowledge of child exploitation, illegal pornography, coercion, AI-generated abuse and coordinated account networks.
Fourth, confirmed criminal material and relevant associated evidence should be referred securely to the appropriate authorities, including NCMEC and the UK's National Crime Agency where applicable.
Finally, lawful adult pornography should be separated from the ordinary social-media experience.
A properly moderated, effectively age-restricted adult-content section would make more sense than allowing pornographic material to spill into unrelated timelines and conversations.
Users should not have to police X content.
Consensual adult pornography, including lawful BDSM, should receive appropriate warnings and restrictions.
Child abuse material, bestiality and other prohibited sexual exploitation must not be permitted behind an age gate.
The purpose is not to prohibit lawful adult sexual expression.
It is to prevent exploitation and unwanted exposure while making the platform safer for everyone else.
12/12 - The issue is accountability, not simply the number of posts removed
On 14 October 2026, Ofcom confirmed that its investigation into X remained open, including examination of illegal-content risks, reporting systems and moderation decisions.
Ofcom also found that some age-restricted pornography had previously been accessible without completed age verification. X subsequently made changes to restrict properly labelled pornography.
That is a development worth acknowledging.
But the wider question remains.
What happens to material that is not labelled correctly? What happens when prohibited content is promoted through replies? What happens when the same distribution operation reappears under new accounts?
And how does X investigate connected accounts rather than repeatedly processing isolated reports?
The company's stated policies already prohibit child sexual exploitation, including computer-generated material and links to illegal content.
The question is whether its systems can enforce those rules effectively and consistently.
Removing one offending account may be necessary. But it is not sufficient if the people distributing the material can immediately continue through other accounts.
Platforms must be able to identify, investigate and disrupt organised abuse networks, while protecting lawful expression, privacy and due process.
Child protection cannot depend indefinitely on volunteers repeatedly finding and reporting the same material, while the infrastructure distributing it remains operational.
The challenge for X is to demonstrate that it is addressing the entire system, not merely its most visible symptoms.
Ofcom: 14 October 2026 investigation update
ofcom.org.uk/online-safety/i…