The fool didn't know it was impossible so he did it
Joined April 2024
- Tweets14.6K
- Following1.4K
- Followers39K
- Likes9.2K
Pinned Tweet
I’ve recently started using the PF App and it’s been genuinely impressive especially the callouts feature.
That’s why I’ve decided to switch to the PF App for all my callouts going forward. Why? I use my main wallet on both Terminal and the PF App. It’s extremely convenient: I can buy on Terminal or the app, then drop my thesis and callout directly on PF
I’ll be buying both long-term plays and low-cap gems. You’ll see me calling everything from 10K MC to $1M ones if I spot an opportunity, I’m calling it regardless of market cap
Bonus points:
0% fees and Multi-chain support
OH and BTW if you followed me yesterday , I called a clean 10X on Louie from 100K to 1M
LETS WIN.
🤝 Paid partnership
this is actually huge and if they’re backing this by data that’s public then it’s amazing
cross chain swaps experience isn’t the best in terms of fills and speed
this fixes it.
I genuinely aspire to be this level of smart on chain
how you could've figured out @papertrade_xyz well ahead of launch
1. papertrade had 2-3 testnet deploys that were very public. You could
a. decompile the contract (guess function sigs by hashing different inputs)
b. figure out that the relayer had size then FCFS priority by looking at landed transactions then reverse-eng the relayer implementation (because the test instance didn't vary expiry of submitted txs)
c. figure out exactly what tx shape you had to send the relayer
this allowed you to figure out
1. you had to submit 10m orders
2. you had to be fast
you could easily guess infra was in tokyo and you could send the same tx with repeat nonces multiple times and only one would be included.
2. in the previous deployments there was a 5m OI cap and a keeper that raised OI caps by only 5m per block
- this meant being fast after OI caps raised was important
- so read latency was important (ie. you could've run your own non-validating hype node)
3. the docs clearly outlined deadband + fees per price band. Therefore you could build volatility dependent trading that
a. took higher lev trades during low vol and closed faster
b. took lower lev trades during high vol and closed on bigger moves
these could bring your blended cost down
4. everything else was reaction on first day
a. did you adjust strategy based on 150m pre-deposits therefore making it clear being early was paramount?
b. were you willing to lose commensurate amount by having a view on what total trader losses would be as a % of predeposits?
c. did you adjust leverage and position closing based on low volatility on the weekend
d. did you have a thesis on how sticky flow would be and therefore farm longer than some of the guys that only traded day 1
anyway just random thoughts as a bystander from the discourse that i see about it on X.
this is amazing
sign up with my code and i’ll kick back 25 of the 50 as well making it 75 dollars to you
LETS WIN
My code : KayThedoc
The MOST REWARDING referral program in crypto’s history.
We’re giving away ALL of the Pumpfun App’s revenue via rewards!
- Your referral deposits $50 → both of you get $50 on top
- ~10% reduced fees for your referrals
- Referrers get a limited-time 4x boost
Learn more 👇
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Signing up or depositing alone earns nothing. Per pump.fun’s terms, the reward equals the new user’s first fiat purchase (max $50). It is paid in installments only if they trade on 5 separate days within 10 days; otherwise it’s forfeited. pump.fun/docs/referral-…
