a crypto project can have an interesting economic model and still struggle if ordinary users find it difficult to understand. this is something i think more web3 teams should pay attention to. not every user wants to spend hours studying tokenomics before interacting with a platform. people need clear information about what they are doing, what they can expect, and what risks they are taking. that is why practical user experience matters when evaluating @RebateLaunch. the purchase bonus mechanism is one example. showing the applicable bonus before a transaction is confirmed can help users understand the terms of that transaction. delivering eligible bonus tokens as part of the same transaction can also reduce friction compared with requiring a separate claim. but the experience should not stop there. users should be able to understand how eligibility works, whether conditions apply, and how the bonus relates to the amount they actually receive. the same principle applies to holder distributions. if eligible holders are intended to receive $USDG directly in their wallets, clear information about payout timing, eligibility, and reward calculations can make the mechanism easier to follow. users should not have to guess why a distribution changed or assume that every wallet will receive the same amount. i would also like to see accessible explanations of the proposed relationship between launchpad fees and $REBATE buybacks and burns. the more understandable the mechanics are, the easier it becomes for people to make informed decisions. this is not about removing every technical detail. it is about presenting those details in a way that both experienced participants and newcomers can understand. @starlisting gives creators an opportunity to support that goal through educational content. instead of only discussing what a project announces, creators can explain how its features work from the user's perspective. what is straightforward? what needs clarification? what should someone understand before participating? those questions create more practical value than another generic prediction about future growth. for me, good crypto infrastructure should not only be technically interesting. it should also be understandable, accessible, and transparent enough for users to evaluate independently.