I sometimes tweet about things other than football.

Liverpool, UK.
Joined August 2010
Yesterday's Gary Neville podcast is hilariously unhinged. Carrick is sound because he used to start off the singing of Man United songs in the pub. WTF? 🤣🤣
1
1
222
Tsimikas did it first.
LOVE HIM😭❤️, PUTTING HIS BODY ON THE LINE😤🔥🔥 LOVE HIS PASSION 🔴🔥, WHAT A HEAD TACKLE 😅😭.
3
62
Campioni 20 retweeted
Not letting that referee get off scot free without a ribbing off me, he was fucking terrible today.
26
3
2
287
15,578
Watching Kerkez is painful. Seeing teams targeting him as a weak link is painful.
40
Our most promising league performance of the season, so far. That's the fastest a game has passed by in a long time. It tees next Sunday up nicely. Onwards!
1
37
One team created chances, scored from them and won the game. 🎻🎻🎻
💬 𝗤𝗨𝗢𝗧𝗘 - Fabian Hurzeler: “Everyone in the stadium saw that there was one team who really tried to create and try to win this game and therefore I have to praise my players.”
39
Campioni 20 retweeted
⭐️ A blindfolded man in a room with no windows or lights could have seen Rio Ngumoha had talent to burn but it’s not overstating it to say this has been a coming of age night for him. Played with maturity, terrified Villarreal’s defence and deservedly left to a standing ovation
10
35
740
20,678
I'll definitely take that win after the first half an hour. That was abysmal. The contract seeking Mac Allister is much more enjoyable to watch than last season's World Cup focused one. There's still so much for Iraola to improve and implement.
55
Campioni 20 retweeted
John Houlding in 1892:
Replying to @PaulAndo1987
They shouldn’t have been allowed back in the ground
1
11
1,899
A good week for Wirtz. Maybe he needs to play against League One level sides and 10 men more often.
44
A very unconvincing win. So much for Iraola to improve on and still implement.
47
Thank you for the 3 points, you absolute mad bastard, Yehor Yarmolyuk.
41
Jordan Pickford being nicknamed "Pickers" on this is an accurate reflection of the man. I'm saying no more. If you know, you know.
The players have got something good to talk about… 👀📱 Join Everton Mobile: evertonmobile.com

61
Campioni 20 retweeted
Reminds me of the time my Dad sorted me a half season ticket for getting a T Mobile contract phone
The players have got something good to talk about… 👀📱 Join Everton Mobile: evertonmobile.com

1
1
6
1,942
Translation: Khaldoon & Co thinks the Appeal Board won’t have the guts or the will to call out the Abu Dhabi Govt. as liars and fraudsters, willing to produce forgeries and commit perjury. They will. They’re going to eviscerate them. It’ll be a bloodbath.
Manchester City’s claim to have “irrefutable evidence” that will overturn their guilty verdict on appeal is based on a trove of emails, letters and bank statements. A re-examination of Abu Dhabi government documents, receipts and testimony from 24 witnesses – all of which the club believe were wrongly dismissed at the original hearing – will be central in attempts to force a full or partial acquittal or retrial, according to people familiar with the case. @Tom_Morgs breaks down City's 'irrefutable evidence' ⤵️ telegraph.co.uk/football/202…
68
144
4
1,908
94,790
Campioni 20 retweeted
C’est juste le GIF du siècle mdrrrrrrrrrrr
149
8,117
268
96,719
1,505,820
👀
186
2,718
216
19,371
563,033
⚖️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗶𝘂𝘀 𝗣𝗟 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆’𝘀 𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 1., Since the charges ended in 2018, doesn’t that mean Man City won’t be punished for anything that happened afterwards? 2., What’s stopping Man City from coming straight back up the year after relegation and taking over again? 3., When will the years post-2018 be investigated? So… 1., The illicit sporting advantage they built up over 2009-2018 didn’t just disappear. It helped them buy expensive additions to their squad, generate big broadcast revenues and justify huge commercial deals. All of that was carried forward after 2018 and addressing those illicit gains is entirely within the scope of the Commission’s sanctions. 2., The Commission can apply an ongoing sanction regime that mitigates for the accumulated illicit sporting advantage. For example, a repeating points deduction or forced reduction in spend. 3., I don’t think there’s much point in investigating post-2018 because I can’t imagine any evidence was left to be found. But they still have all these huge, brand new sponsorships approved under the new rules! Hundreds of millions that they’ll keep receiving for many years to come. Surely any sanction they get won’t fix that? Maybe not… but there’s another way… Until December 2021, the Premier League’s PSR had a provision for Related Party Transactions (RPTs). All RPTs had to be reported to the PL Board and adjusted for Fair Market Value (FMV). What constitutes a “Related Party” is a matter for accounting standards, not a PL definition. In Dec 2021, the PL updated the RPT rules to the Associated Party Transaction (APT) rules. They used their own, much broader definition to ensure clubs with powerful nation-state owners could not readily circumvent the rules. This new rule applied to any new, renewed or amended deal that clubs entered into from Dec 2021. Which means any deal entered into before this date and not modified, was subject to the RPT rules. The Independent Commission found that the Abu-Dhabi-owned sponsors of Man City were Related Parties. This was never declared by Man City and the FMV test was never run. It is my understanding that some of these deals continued to run all the way up to late 2025. In which case, Man City has continued to breach rules regarding financial reporting, good faith compliance and most likely PSR too. In fact, by my estimations, Man City has breached another 15 rules every season for the 7 seasons 18/19-24/25. 100+ more rule breaches that Man City MUST be charged with. The PL Board has no choice in that. This time, they have the option to settle the charges (that option was not available to them before this season). But as regulator, they must charge. At first, I did not understand why they didn’t apply the charges in this same case. It could have been because they did not make the decision to pursue an RPT strategy until late in the case prep. Regardless, they’ve been determined to be RPTs now. A fact that will be difficult to reverse. That means Man City definitely broke rules every season post-2018 until all of their RPTs ended and were replaced with updated APTs. The RPTs were all likely heavily overstated too - FMV would have been much lower than the value of the RPTs. And there’s the kicker for Man City. Not only will this hammer their PSR from 2018-2025. It will also invalidate all of their new APTs. The FMVs of their various APTs will have all been determined under false pretences and must be invalidated. They’ll have to repeat them… this time, in full knowledge of their cheating and damaged brand. By waiting for this Commission to conclude and issue its findings, it lays the foundations for ensuring successful charges for 2018-2025 and invalidating their current hoard of APTs. Game over.
70
219
16
1,254
99,086
Man City so confident in their appeal that they add a new KC to their long-standing team at great expense Panic in the halls of City Football Hq 🤪
EXCL: Mark Howard KC is advising Man City in its PL legal battle, The Lawyer has learned. Howard, whose past clients include Roman Abramovich and Elton John, received £9m - the highest known brief fee ever paid to a barrister - for a separate case in 2023. thelawyer.com/manchester-cit…
47
123
9
1,800
131,289
Kate is boss. 🫡
Kate really went there with Micah ☠️
1
52