Keith retweeted
Anyone else getting sick and tired of seeing what looks like an interesting post just to click “see more” and someone wrote a freaking book?
Keith retweeted
this will sound mean but PLEASE get over things faster. You don’t want to waste your good years being angry, bitter, and sad.
Keith retweeted
Tiwa Savage vibing to “Commando,” her latest collaboration with Uganda’s Joshua Baraka. 🔥🇺🇬
Keith retweeted
Cuando veas un tuit que te gusta o que creas que merece ser leído, le das a «copiar enlace» (no hace falta siquiera que luego lo pegues en ningún sitio).
El algoritmo entiende que ese tuit es interesante y es lo que cuenta ahora, mucho más que los me gusta, comentarios o retuits. 😊
Keith retweeted
The saddest part of opening this app is making eye contact with a legendary post for half a second right before the timeline refreshes and buries it forever.
Just gone.
Sharing your relationship matters on radio exposes your privacy and for most of the time you'll end up with wrong advise because feedback is given selectively and for entertainment purposes. The best place to get advise is from counsellors, church leaders & older couples.
40
Keith retweeted
In film credits, the difference between “&” and “and” is more significant than it looks.
If two screenwriters’ names are joined by “&”, they wrote the screenplay together, collaborating on the same draft.
For example: Written by Jane Smith & John Dave. This means they worked together as a team to develop and write the screenplay.
If their names are separated by “and”, it means one writer worked on the script first, and another came in later to revise or rewrite it.
For example: Written by Jane Smith and John Dave. This means Jane worked on the screenplay first, and John came in later to revise or rewrite it. They contributed separately at different stages rather than working together as a team.





























