Katharina Limbeck retweeted
This is an exciting collaboration with @LimbeckKat, Lydia Mezrag, and @mrguywolf, supported by @TU_Muenchen, @HelmholtzMunich, @Mila_Quebec, @UMontreal and @unifr.
🖖
🧵6/6
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
Want to learn more?
🌟Check out our paper, code, blog post, and video!🌟
📜 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2506.11700
🖥️ Code: github.com/aidos-lab/mag_edg…
📄 Blog: aidos.group/blog/magedge/
📽️ Video: youtu.be/uQts_HR1uSA
🧵5/6
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
And it just works!
Our pooling methods perform well across tasks and…
🏆 …reach top classification and regression performance.
🔥 …retain this robust performance across pooling ratios.
✨ …preserve graph structure and spectral properties
🧵4/n
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
But…how?
🔍 We contract the most redundant edges that are least relevant for the graph’s structural diversity as measured by the magnitude or spread of a graph.
🧵3/n
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
Why do we need structure-aware pooling, anyway?
🔮Our methods, MagEdgePool and SpreadEdgePool, faithfully preserve the original graphs’ geometry.
Alternative pooling layers destroy graph structure to varying extents.
🧵2/n
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
Big graph, little compute?
In our #NeurIPS2025 paper we propose geometry-aware edge-contraction-based pooling methods for GNNs.
Our methods preserve graph structure, make interpretable pooling choices, and ensure robust performance at downstream tasks.
🧵1/n
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
Hi!👋Emily Simons here, @FulbrightPrgrm Student Researcher with @HelmholtzMunich's AIDOS Lab.
Happy to be sharing my first contribution to AIDOS in this 🧵.
Say hiya to SCOTT, the perfect holiday (software) package🎁for the #curvature and #graph enthusiast in your life.
🧵1/n
Katharina Limbeck retweeted
Coming up today at #NeurIPS2024!
Poster #3303 in the East Exhibit Hall from 16:30 to 19:30 EST!
My awesome student @LimbeckKat will present her great work while I'll try to ignore the ML FOMO at home 😅
Coming up soon at #NeurIPS2024, combining #geometry and #topology:
“Metric Space Magnitude for Evaluating the Diversity of Latent Representations”
❓ Ever wondered how to best assess the diversity of model outputs or how to choose between models?
👉We address these questions by measuring the diversity of generative models, assessing LLMs, and analysing latent spaces. Embeddings allow us to intuitively understand similarities between e.g. generated graphs, images or sentences, and we leverage this knowledge to automatically measure diversity.
🤔 But how to best measure diversity? From a mathematical perspective, diversity measures should fulfil theoretical guarantees. However, we find that many baseline diversity measures currently used for assessing latent spaces and generative models do not fulfil these necessary requirements.
🔍 We leverage the magnitude of metric spaces to define a family of novel, multi-scale diversity measures. Magnitude is a powerful geometric descriptor that measures diversity as the effective number of distinct points or clusters across varying scales of distance. By summarising magnitude across multiple resolutions, we then define theoretically-well funded measures of the intrinsic diversity or of the difference in diversity.
🚀 Experiments validate our proposed diversity measures. When evaluating LLMs, our magnitude-based measures characterise text embedding models by their diversity and best capture the ground-truth diversity of generated sentences. Further, when evaluating image and graph generative models, magnitude reliably detects mode collapse and mode dropping outperforming alternative evaluation metrics.
🔮 This work improves the diversity evaluation of latent spaces by leveraging magnitude as a theoretically-motivated measure of diversity and geometry. It paves the way for better benchmarking practices in generative model evaluation and further exploring the expressivity of magnitude in ML applications.
Check out our paper or code to learn more!
📜 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2311.16054
💻 Code: github.com/aidos-lab/magnipy
📹 Video: youtube.com/watch?v=sZBP52Q2…
👏Joint work w/ @LimbeckKat, @randreeva1 and @RikSarkarNet.
📢 Poster: #NeurIPS2024, Vancouver, Friday 13th December, 16:30
🎉 Excited to share the first accepted paper of my PhD!
🔍 Our work explores latent spaces and demonstrates the utility of metric space magnitude for evaluating diversity.
💫 I’m grateful to everyone who made this possible and look forward to connecting at #NeurIPS2024!
Coming up soon at #NeurIPS2024, combining #geometry and #topology:
“Metric Space Magnitude for Evaluating the Diversity of Latent Representations”
❓ Ever wondered how to best assess the diversity of model outputs or how to choose between models?
👉We address these questions by measuring the diversity of generative models, assessing LLMs, and analysing latent spaces. Embeddings allow us to intuitively understand similarities between e.g. generated graphs, images or sentences, and we leverage this knowledge to automatically measure diversity.
🤔 But how to best measure diversity? From a mathematical perspective, diversity measures should fulfil theoretical guarantees. However, we find that many baseline diversity measures currently used for assessing latent spaces and generative models do not fulfil these necessary requirements.
🔍 We leverage the magnitude of metric spaces to define a family of novel, multi-scale diversity measures. Magnitude is a powerful geometric descriptor that measures diversity as the effective number of distinct points or clusters across varying scales of distance. By summarising magnitude across multiple resolutions, we then define theoretically-well funded measures of the intrinsic diversity or of the difference in diversity.
🚀 Experiments validate our proposed diversity measures. When evaluating LLMs, our magnitude-based measures characterise text embedding models by their diversity and best capture the ground-truth diversity of generated sentences. Further, when evaluating image and graph generative models, magnitude reliably detects mode collapse and mode dropping outperforming alternative evaluation metrics.
🔮 This work improves the diversity evaluation of latent spaces by leveraging magnitude as a theoretically-motivated measure of diversity and geometry. It paves the way for better benchmarking practices in generative model evaluation and further exploring the expressivity of magnitude in ML applications.
Check out our paper or code to learn more!
📜 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2311.16054
💻 Code: github.com/aidos-lab/magnipy
📹 Video: youtube.com/watch?v=sZBP52Q2…
👏Joint work w/ @LimbeckKat, @randreeva1 and @RikSarkarNet.
📢 Poster: #NeurIPS2024, Vancouver, Friday 13th December, 16:30
In my first Tweet, I’m excited to share my first 👥collaboration with @randreeva1, @Pseudomanifold and @RikSarkarNet. Check out our 📝preprint to 🔮find out how magnitude relates to generalisation in neural networks!
@helmholtz_ai @MunichDS @InfAtEd
📜 arxiv.org/abs/2305.05611
🚨So excited to share our first paper in collaboration with @Pseudomanifold, @LimbeckKat and @RikSarkarNet, in which we connect the "exotic" 🦄invariant magnitude with the generalisation error in neural networks!
@BioMedAI_CDT @HelmholtzMunich
📜➡️arxiv.org/abs/2305.05611










