
|| Self Proclaimed Nerd || NFT Boomer || Nikola Jokic Stan || @theplaguenft ||@SappySealsNFT || @pudgypenguins || @y00tsNFT || @0n1Force || @Claynosaurz
Minnesota
Joined September 2012
- Tweets16.6K
- Following3.3K
- Followers4.4K
- Likes46.6K
Pinned Tweet
What a frickn gift on a Sunday when ETH is mashing.
Locked up my first Type 0N1 for an absolute steal! 👺
@0n1Force
Every media platform they conned us into subscribing to by dangling “no-ads” are useless now.
If it’s not the platform it’s the channel or content creator which are even more disruptive and annoying.
Time to head back to CDs, Blue Rays and DVDs
Ludicrous retweeted
Some of us never forgot.
Replying to @JDVance
Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it.
Ludicrous retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene just admitted the Epstein files were blocked by Donald Trump himself.
“He fought the hardest to STOP these files from being released.”
Not Democrats. Not the DOJ. Not “the deep state.”
Trump.
Ludicrous retweeted
Calling the Epstein files a fraud when they’re uploaded to .gov websites during your own dictatorship is a level of cognitive dissonance that should be studied
Ludicrous retweeted
🚨 MELINDA GATES WARNS OF A “RECKONING” - BREAKS HER SILENCE ON EPSTEIN AND POINTS STRAIGHT AT BILL GATES
In a raw on-camera moment on the Wild Card with Rachel Martin podcast, Melinda Gates says “we’re having a reckoning” as she finally speaks about Jeffrey Epstein and the people around him. She calls what happened to those girls “beyond heartbreaking” - and admits the Epstein revelations drag up “very painful times” from her marriage.
Then she draws a hard line. The unanswered questions, she says, are not for her - they’re for “those people… and my ex-husband.” She explains she had to leave the marriage, had to step away from the foundation, and says she’s “grateful to be away from all the muck.”
With Epstein files resurfacing and names back in the spotlight, her timing feels impossible to ignore. The reckoning she’s talking about doesn’t sound abstract - it sounds personal. And the man left holding the questions is Bill Gates.
How much does Melinda Gates really know - and what does it mean for Bill Gates?
Ludicrous retweeted
Dear right wingers, the left were right about most of their conspiracy theories.
Dear left wingers, the right were right about most of their conspiracy theories.
Now if we could stop fighting each other and realise the real enemy is the ruling class, that would be great!
Ludicrous retweeted
🚨 This is one of those moments where the insult accidentally turns into lore.
This is an internal Epstein email from his publicist Peggy Siegel after meeting Michael Saylor, the tech billionaire and Bitcoin enthusiast.
She’s basically complaining that Saylor is unusable.
No ego. No vanity. No sex bait. No social instincts. No obvious fear. She literally says she doesn’t even know how she’d blackmail him because he doesn’t respond to normal human buttons.
In Epstein-world, that’s a malfunction.
Sometimes being socially unreadable saves your ass.
🚨🇺🇸 EPSTEIN FILES: What’s going on here is the usual Epstein fever dream.
You’ve got creepy, rambling notes that read like a rejected sci-fi villain monologue. Eugenics, “superior humans,” mysticism, self-importance.
The only thing this guy was capable of engineering was more evidence that money plus power plus zero morals turns people into absolute freaks.
Ludicrous retweeted
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Ludicrous retweeted
The problem is simple: We’ve incentivized division.
Mainstream media makes money when you’re pissed off. Political parties gain power when you’re scared of the other side.
Everyone’s getting rich keeping us at each other’s throats while real problems go unsolved.
I’ve learned a thing or two in our work evacuating people from Afghanistan, fighting genocide, responding to mass shootings, working South Memphis streets, and coordinating disaster relief: The hate and division you see on your screen isn’t real. It’s manufactured.
Out here in the real world - where consequences actually show up - none of that tribal bullshit survives first contact with true human suffering. When Afghan refugees need extraction, nobody asks how you voted. When a hurricane hits, the guy with a boat doesn’t check your party registration. When a kid overdoses on Fentanyl, their parents don’t care about your political ideology.
The problem is that while we’re all busy choosing sides and dunking on each other online, people are dying. Kids are being trafficked. Veterans are killing themselves. Addicts are overdosing.
Communities are collapsing. And instead of solving these problems together, we’re letting talking heads and algorithms convince us that our neighbors are the enemy.
I’ve seen convicted felons and federal agents work side by side. I’ve watched gang members and cops coordinate to save lives. I’ve seen people with absolutely nothing in common beyond pain show up and shoulder loads that weren’t theirs to carry.
So yeah, can we stop ganging up on each other and gang up on the actual problems? Because I promise you - most of America actually agrees on what needs fixing. We just don’t know it yet because we’re too busy consuming content designed to keep us divided.
The division pays. But it doesn’t have to.
Turn off the noise. Go meet your neighbor. Find out what they actually think instead of what you’ve been told they think.
That’s the problem. That’s also the solution.
Ludicrous retweeted
Schrödinger’s Second Amendment:
- Guns are a mandatory prerequisite for the government to respect your rights.
- Guns immediately invalidate your rights and the government can execute you on the spot if you have one.
Ludicrous retweeted
Carrying a firearm is not a death sentence, it’s a Constitutionally protected God-given right, and if you don’t understand this you have no business in law enforcement or government.
If you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you.
Don’t do it!
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The U.S. Constitution (particularly the 2nd, 4th, and 14th amendments) prohibit officers from shooting citizens merely for possessing a weapon that is not an “imminent threat”. This was reaffirmed in Graham v Connor, which says force must be reasonable.
supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/…
justice.gov/jm/1-16000-dep….
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitut…


































