@LukeGessler

Low-resource NLP and more at @IUBloomington Linguistics. Formerly @Georgetown, @CUBoulder

 Bloomington, IN
lgessler.com
Joined July 2011
  • Tweets680
  • Following363
  • Followers1.3K
36Media
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Replying to @st8less
former healthcare software dev here, vibe coding would probably improve the ux of the vast majority of healthcare software
2
32
Replying to @koutchoukalimar
linguist here, think borges' sentiment is perfectly fine and that this way of expressing it is also fine
53
2,750
I'm really going to miss Opus 5. Every model has had its quirks ("You're absolutely right!"), but Opus 5 was serving up chicken fried tokens like none other. I did my best impression of the Opus 5 dialect of Claudish in the Opus 5.5 announcement thread on HN. Ubi sunt!
text that reads: I should find information about the user's concern instead of just assuming. The user is right. The outage is a real concern, and the issue is worse than we realized. Requests to Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5 encountered elevated error rates. Worth stating plainly: these are not just models — they are load bearing rungs on the software development tooling ladder, and a blocker on this level makes the outage really bite. One decision that is yours to make, not mine: should an email be drafted to Anthropic support? This issue has teeth, and a canonical handoff can land us where the main gate is no longer breaking silently.

ALT text that reads: I should find information about the user's concern instead of just assuming. The user is right. The outage is a real concern, and the issue is worse than we realized. Requests to Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5 encountered elevated error rates. Worth stating plainly: these are not just models — they are load bearing rungs on the software development tooling ladder, and a blocker on this level makes the outage really bite. One decision that is yours to make, not mine: should an email be drafted to Anthropic support? This issue has teeth, and a canonical handoff can land us where the main gate is no longer breaking silently.

1
170
Replying to @LukeGessler @mattyglesias
corollary: this gives you a loose indication of how long they think it will take to get to the next "major version" (whole number)
30
Replying to @mattyglesias
if you're talking about why it's 5.5 and not 5.1: that's because ai companies have accepted that the public processes this as "halfway to 6" rather than "minor version 5 of opus 5" and have stopped trying to do version numbers with them
1
1
243
TMLR has faced a deluge of submissions, necessitating stricter desk rejection policies due to limited reviewer capacity Co-EiC Nihar Shah reached out to authors of 10 papers slated for desk reject. Could they answer questions about their *own* submission? medium.com/@TmlrOrg/asking-a…

Asking Authors About Their Own Papers

By Nihar B. Shah

medium.com
27
217
95
1,066
707,735
Replying to @tallinzen
before AI my philosophy was that if i leave a bad review then i need to be very careful to explain why, but when i review slop now idk what to do. Do you just outright say "this is clearly slop" or what?
1
5
261
Luke Gessler retweeted
ACL 2027@aclmeetingSep 11
ACL Sustainable Reviewing Policy: We are introducing changes in the @ReviewAcl reviewing and submissions. The changes will cap authors and introduce changes in the reviewing to keep our community sustainable. #NLProc
3
32
9
123
34,277
Replying to @rolphrecto
You're absolutely right!
1
41
made the mistake of asking claude to proofread an email in which i described claude output that i had not reviewed as potential "slop" and claude got really really mad at me
160
Replying to @AmirAbaskohi @ReviewAcl @emnlpmeeting
FWIW when I'm AC on a paper where this happens I do do my best to take the authors' work into account
1
82
Replying to @LukeGessler @jaycaspiankang
2. a wordle-esque daily challenge where everyone sees the same questions and the results are somehow shareable would be fun so you can tell your friends how dumb they are for missing #7 etc.
1
1
96
Replying to @jaycaspiankang
this is awesome, replying because i can't dm you: 1. it'd be interesting if you posted either the exact prompt or just some key details somewhere so we can know what the process is like
1
41
Replying to @EbrightYon @Nationwide
"insurance"
1
81
Replying to @tszzl @ashter_haider @alokranj
de bello gallico is propaganda... not really the same kind of book
2
146
Replying to @timgilmour @nominalthoughts
come on, the charitable read is that the "why" means "how it arises" there
1
70
Replying to @ayatabourashed @Andrew_Akbashev
this is about review articles (surveys of specific topics/subfields), not peer reviews (evaluations of submitted works)
18
Replying to @iwsfutcmd
could it not be that the "There are pants all over the road." case is just ambiguous in a way that that either one in that squirrel pair is not?
1
29
Statement from Ranking Member @RepGregoryMeeks demanding answers on and the legal justification for the Trump administration’s strike on a vessel in the Caribbean Sea last week:
1
16
1
21
3,449
Replying to @jamesr66a
as is Widget widget = new Widget();
1
93
Load more