Mitzi retweeted
King Abdullah of Jordan stood at the UN last week and delivered a powerful speech against Israel’s intervention in Syria, accusing Israel of being an expansionist state.
Today, Jordan attacked southern Syria.
Don’t get me wrong: I stand with King Abdullah in this attack, and in any attack against terrorists who target Jordan.
But I also stand with Israel, which had to make sure that, after Syria fell to ISIS, they would never be able to create another Gaza on Israel’s border.
Mitzi retweeted
“No, this is untrue but I won’t say what I think is untrue nor will I provide any actual data or facts to contradict anything that’s said I’ll just say it’s untrue”.
@grok fact check me
1. Were the Palestinians offered a country in 1947?
2. Did they say “no” and then attack Israel?
3. Have the majority of their decisions and actions since then demonstrated they don’t want a state?
4. Have the majority of their decisions and actions since then demonstrated they want to wipe out the Jews in Israel?
Mitzi retweeted
1. Yes. UN Res 181 offered an Arab state (~45% of Mandate) alongside a Jewish one. Arab Higher Committee rejected it.
2. Yes. Rejection sparked immediate Arab attacks on Jews (Nov 1947 civil war). Arab armies invaded after Israel's May 1948 independence.
3. Leadership rejected multiple offers (1937, 1947, Camp David 2000, Olmert 2008). Oslo accepted but stalled amid violence and maximalist demands. Pattern shows statehood secondary to other goals.
4. Pre-Oslo PLO and Hamas charters call for Israel's elimination. Actions by key groups align with ending the Jewish state, though PLO formally recognized it in 1993.
Mitzi retweeted
This is becoming absolutely ridiculous.
Just a quick update on the case, I’ve received a phone call from the Metropolitan Police informing me that the case has been dropped with no further action.
I’ve been arrested seven times simply for expressing my views, yet I’ve never been charged. Just endless stress, anxiety, and nights spent in a cell.
Mitzi retweeted
> be a high-flying MIT scientist
> discover mTOR
> expected to win a Nobel Prize some day
> have consensual relationship with younger female biology MIT professor
> she accuses him of sexual harassment, coercion and grooming after he declines a long term relationship with her
> MIT launches investigation
> MIT lets the accuser’s allies help pick the judges and threaten the president if he wasn’t destroyed
> lo and behold, investigation finds he violated MIT’s sexual relationship and anti-harassment policies
> he gets fired and resigns under threat of termination
> loses his lab
> he sues her for defamation
> jury awards him $6 million in defamation case and rejects her claims that she was coerced in any way
How did 13 members of a civilian jury come to a different conclusion than @MIT?
Answer: MIT’s investigation was not exactly independent thanks to coordinated female faculty collusion. It was a kangaroo court and the verdict was pre-determined
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES INSIDER INFLUENCE OVER MIT'S TENURE-REVIEW PROCESS IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia's involvement in the selection of Sabatini's tenure-review committee
On 27 September 2021, Kristin Knouse exchanged messages with Izabella Pena following a conversation with @MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia.
The court-disclosed messages reveal Kristin Knouse telling Izabella Pena:
🔴 “Sangeeta just called”
🔴 “they even asked for insight into who to put on the committee”
🔴 “AND she said she will go to Rafael Reif’s office and protest the decision if and when needed.”
Pena responded:
“At least they are asking her insight”
Knouse replied:
“Exactly”
“This is good”
⚠️ The evidence exposes a troubling channel of insider influence surrounding MIT's tenure-review process.
These contemporaneous communications document that Knouse understood Bhatia to have been consulted about the committee's composition and to be prepared to challenge its eventual decision directly with MIT President Rafael Reif.
Rather than an independent review insulated from interested parties, the messages reveal access to the committee-selection process by an academic aligned with the complainant, raising serious concerns about institutional impartiality and conflicts of interest.
This disclosure adds another significant piece to the growing documentary record surrounding the institutional handling of Professor @DMSabatini's case.
📑 REVIEW THW ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
Mitzi retweeted
When Israel struck Syria to stop the slaughter of Druze civilians, where Syrian forces had massacred hundreds of innocent men, women and children, half the world lost its mind.
When Jordan strikes Syria after gunmen kill people at a church, the world shrugs and is silent.
Same country. Same kind of strike. Yet different rules depending on who is flying the planes.
🚨 JORDAN CARRIES OUT AIRSTRIKES NEAR SYRIAN BORDER
Jordanian forces are reportedly carrying out airstrikes near the Syrian-Jordanian border.
According to initial reports, the strikes are targeting “elements” linked to Friday’s deadly attack on a Greek Orthodox church in Karak, which killed nine people.
Jordanian authorities earlier arrested three suspects in connection with the church attack, though officials have not publicly linked them to any specific militant organization.
Mitzi retweeted
HOLY COW!
President Trump is going to offer $1 million reward for tipoffs that lead to voter fraud convictions.
Mr. President, there are thousands of non-citizens on the voter rolls in Pennsylvania.
Re: Non-juror records
Mitzi retweeted
A British government minister should be fired immediately for saying this
It means that most of us cannot trust the government any more
Mitzi retweeted
Hello Alex Alex Alex,
Let me summarize the book UNELECTED in a nutshell.
The Industrial Revolution created a class of private citizens with unimaginable wealth. Many were reviled as robber barons (e.g., Rockefeller of Standard Oil). Others had a better image, like Andrew Carnegie.
These new rich decided because they had money, they had a responsibility to do good by the world. So they started building global philanthropic networks that could go into every country. In order to do so, they hired Department of State and Department of War and other state officials.
They quickly took over the country's education system starting in the 1920s to train them in the "international mind."
When the intelligence community truly sprang up in World War II, the IC hired from ... these same shadowy philanthropic networks. And after WWII, they all coalesced on the same goal: the best chance at achieving a human utopia is to bring the entire world to "democracy."
Except it turns out converting countries to democracy isn't so simple as just financing CIA coups. Did all those NGOs question their own assumption might be flawed - that not every peoples, not every culture and religion is compatible with "democracy"?
No. Instead, the Trilateral Commission in the 1970s concluded that a more technocratic route was necessary. And over many iterations - the Balkans and African adventures of the 90s, the Iraq & Afghanistan ventures, Arab Spring and color revolutions ... every failed iteration of "democracy" always resulted in the same conclusion: the people are dumb, we have to try harder, put more pressure on them, tighten the screws.
And now you have become fully self-referential. Anyone who disagrees with you is "authoritarian." Anyone who agrees with you is "our democracy." Voting methods doesn't matter. That the judiciary system blatantly stole the election doesn't matter.
And nowhere this is more obvious in your 30th anniversary publication.
In your 30th anniversary publication, you had an article from your longtime head of Open Society Fund-Serbia, Sonja Licht. She also happens to be one of the most decorated civilians in Europe and widely considered an expert in "democracy:"
🔹 Pro Merit Medal of the Council of Europe
🔹 Star of Italian Solidarity
🔹 French Legion of Honour
Her solution: "I believe the time has come for a responsible, courageous elite, those who care far more about addressing the genuine social problems than about election results. Only a political elite with vision, prudence and a focus on the general good—to whom the electorate, with their active involvement in public life, can cede part of their sovereignty in the elections... spearhead... our struggle to survive."
Read that again.
The idea of democracy as pushed by the head of one of your foundations is to literally stop "election results" and to have the public cede their trust to a technocratic elite.
End democracy to save democracy itself.
This is the final form of a project that started a hundred years ago to spread free markets and create global peace and instill self-governance throughout the world.
This is your legacy, Alex Soros.
Your father spent his life fighting Communism.
You, as his protege, will spend your life perfecting Communism.
In the name of "democracy."
Mitzi retweeted
Every time the science has been settled, somebody paid for the settlement, and the bill has a name on it.
1747: James Lind cures scurvy with lemons. The Navy keeps it settled as a disease of damp air for forty-eight years and loses more sailors to it than to the French.
1799: Bleeding is settled. George Washington is drained of nearly half his blood for a sore throat and is dead by evening.
1847: Childbed fever is settled as bad air. Ignaz Semmelweis washes his hands and the deaths on his ward fall from one mother in ten to one in a hundred. He is sacked, committed, and beaten to death in an asylum.
1915: Pellagra is settled as an infection. Joseph Goldberger proves it is the corn diet of the poor by injecting himself with sufferers' blood. The South keeps the corn, and 100,000 Americans die of it.
1941: The lobotomy is settled, and about to win a Nobel. Rosemary Kennedy, twenty-three, is left unable to walk or speak, one of 40,000 Americans put under the pick.
1956: The pregnancy X-ray is settled as harmless. Alice Stewart shows one scan doubles a child's chance of cancer. She loses her funding and the scans run for another quarter century.
1961: Thalidomide is settled as safe for morning sickness. Ten thousand babies.
1971: DES is settled as a pregnancy protector. The daughters of the women who took it develop a cancer nobody has seen before.
1972: Sugar is settled as harmless. John Yudkin writes that it is not, and the fat men and the sugar men end his career between them.
1984: Fat is settled as the killer, and a generation of mothers swaps the butter for a tub of oil.
2004: Vioxx is settled as a safe painkiller. Up to 140,000 heart attacks before it is pulled.
The science was settled every single time. The only thing it ever settled was who took the blame afterwards.
Mitzi retweeted
تصريح ناري ينفجر في وجه "نخب داڤوس"! 🚨🇺🇸
عندما سأله المذيع محاولاً إحراجه: "لماذا يخشى رؤساء الشركات في أمريكا انتقاد ترامب؟ هناك مناخ من الخوف في بلدكم!"
جاء رد جيمي ديمون (الرئيس التنفيذي لـ JPMorgan) قاطعاً ومباشراً وبلا أدنى تجميل:
"نخبة داڤوس الفكرية! أتيت لداڤوس لسنوات طويلة وأستمع للثرثرة.. هل جعلتم العالم مكاناً أفضل؟ نجتمع لنتحدث ونحاضر فقط! ماذا تريدون مني أن أفعل؟" 🤯
وأضاف بجرأة تامة:
• "لدي آراء قوية.. بعض ما فعله ترامب كان جيداً، وبعضه لم يكن كذلك!"
• "لست من مشجعي الرسوم الجمركية لكن قد تستخدم في حالات معينة، وأرى أنه يجب تغيير نهج الهجرة.. وقد قلت ذلك علانية."
• "ما الذي تريدون مني أن أقوله تباً؟ أنا أحاول إدارة حوار حقيقي بعيداً عن الشعارات!" 💥
رئيس أكبر بنك في أمريكا يصفع النفاق الإعلامي والنخبوي في داڤوس: الكف عن المحاضرات الجاهزة والمواقف الاستعراضية، والتركيز على الواقعية الاقتصادية بعيداً عن الخوف والنفاق!
Mitzi retweeted
I found a way to protect your X account from being locked. Yesterday, I replied to a comment on one of my posts, and I knew my reply would piss off a lot of people, so I sent this reply to Grok and asked if it violated any X rules. Grok’s reply clearly stated that I wasn’t violating any rules on this platform. I copied the link to this conversation and saved it to be used as a shield.
The masses reported it, as expected, and I was locked out of my account for 30 days.
I added the link to my conversation with Grok in my appeal, and ten minutes later my account was unlocked.
You can lose access to your account based on terminology, context, and multiple reports. If you’re not sure about a post or a reply, ask Grok, and if it confirms that you’re clear to go, save this conversation and use it in your appeal.
