0G liquidity is getting a home. Bond is live in beta 👀 @BondSuperApp_ brings the familiar DeFi toolkit together on 0G: • LP pools for 0G, a0G, iAI and other ecosystem assets • Aave-based lending with assets like wBTC, wETH and 0G • Yield vaults • Perps coming later Basically, the DeFi stack you'd usually find spread across a chain, all in one place. The high APRs on the 0G and iAI pools caught my eye 👀 According to Bond's pinned post, a $10M incentive program is also in the works to support early ecosystem growth. Looks like Bond could be the starting point for a more active DeFi ecosystem on @0G_Foundation As an iAI holder, I'm happy to have more ways to put it to work. Once I can ease off the heavy coding a bit, I might unstake some iAI and try LP farming 👀

🏴‍☠️ 내 트랜잭션을 모두 숨기고 싶다면? American Fortress "아 내 트랜잭션 남들이 보는 거 싫은데.. 🤔" - 이름이나 컨셉 이상한 밈코 살 때 - 펍덱 파밍하다 손절하고 CEX 넘기는 패배 트랜잭션을 안보여주고 싶을 때 - 에어드랍용 다계정 파는 데 시빌 걸릴까봐 억지로 CEX 거칠 때 등의 경우 때마다 저는 이런 생각을 꽤 많이 했왔어요. 이 문제를 해결하기 위해 등장한 프로젝트가 있으니, 바로 American Fortress(이하 아포)입니다. 아포는 복잡한 0x 같은 지갑주소 대신 'moeny0stack9'같은 아이디만 입력하면 송금을 할 수 있게 하고, 이와 동시에 백그라운드에서는 매번 스텔스 주소를 생성해 내 메인 지갑을 노출하지 않고도 송금할 수 있는 기능을 제공합니다. ========= $RAIL이나 $STRK를 필두로 다시 한번 프라이버시와 양자 저항이 각광 받는 요즘, 아포는 요즘 시장에서 각광받는 재료를 한곳에 그러모은 프로젝트라 할 수 있어요. 인베스팅 닷컴에 따르면 SAVA 인베스트, Moon Pursuit, 0g Labs로부터 이미 8M 규모의 시드 라운드 투자를 유치했으며, 지금이 시장 적기라고 판단해 슬슬 고개를 드는게 아닐까 해요. 아무리 맛있는 요리라도, 잘 팔릴때까지 기다렸다가 팔아야 된다는 생각이 아니었을지? ========== American Fortess는 이 시기적절한 타이밍에 한국 커뮤니티를 오픈하고 앞으로 다양한 소식을 전할거라고 해요 🇰🇷 커뮤니티를 열었다는 건, 당연히 유저 몫도 어느 정도 있을거고 향후 에어드랍 작업 같은 것도 있지 않을까 생각합니다. 저도 좋은 기회로 아포와 함께 다양한 소식을 전달드릴 수 있게 되었습니다! 에어드랍 가이드는 각 나오는대로 탄탄하게 적어드릴 예정이지만, 일단 커뮤니티 이벤트에서 모바일 상품권 & 스벅 이벤트부터 한번 챙겨보셔요! 바로 불개미 트윗 가서 이벤트 참여까지 레에에쓰고 🏎️

🚨 Arkadiko Post-mortem(Using claude and surfAI) the attacker address provided by @ArkadikoFinance used Claude to trace the funds and cross-checked the results against public on-chain transactions. On October 22 (UTC), 2,065,481.479441 stSTX and 1.65221692 sBTC were drained from Arkadiko vaults. Attacker / fund recipient address: SP1JB85VZ7TX7SWSNW0PHV115YPQE5QXJDG6P60AQ Governance proposal / execution address: SP1V1BN459229EJG94YYBJDN50ADVB6MXVVEZ0G34 Proposal #12 passed with about 4.57 million DIKO in favor and 0 against, granting an attacker-deployed contract permission to withdraw collateral and mint USDA. The attacker also minted 1,500,354,999 unbacked USDA. That is the number of tokens minted, not $1.5 billion in losses. The funds moved as follows. Swaps The attacker swapped stSTX in 5 transactions for about 2.28 million STX. Selling USDA separately netted about 540,000 STX. Distribution From the recipient wallet, about 2.29 million STX and 1.65 sBTC moved to SPR3...SCY1, and about 514,000 STX moved to SP26...KJ18W. Bitcoin Through 4 successful withdrawals, 4.85824088 BTC was paid out to bc1q8h...j08s. That total includes sBTC acquired through additional purchases. The funds then moved to bc1q09...4qle, whose owner has not been identified. Ethereum Across 14 matched bridge transfers, 305,348.87 USDCx was burned on Stacks and 305,320.87 USDC was minted on Ethereum. At the receiving addresses 0x9a86...3875 and 0x4256...4073, the USDC was swapped for ETH. Tornado Cash A downstream wallet, 0xe8cb...5006, deposited 213.3 ETH across 9 transactions. However, other funds were commingled upstream, so the full amount cannot be attributed to the Arkadiko exploit. These figures include swaps and transfers of the same funds, so adding them all together would overstate the losses. The Binance and Bybit deposit routes in the image are marked as "speculative." I confirmed ETH transfers from Binance hot wallets to wallets linked to the incident. What hasn't been confirmed is whether the stolen STX was deposited into those exchanges beforehand. That's the flow. Honestly, I didn't even know governance was still active. I don't know yet how much can be recovered. But based on the public fund flows, I think it's highly likely that most of the direct selling pressure from this incident has already passed. A significant amount has already gone through the market, and my guess is that some of it went to exchanges. The next thing to watch is how much can be frozen and recovered through exchange cooperation and investigations. That said, with STX already carrying Binance's Monitoring Tag, the timing is a real headache. Of course, as an industry leader, Binance will know very well that a dApp exploit and a security flaw in the mainnet itself are different things. I don't expect this incident itself to directly affect Binance's judgment. But I don't think outsiders' trust in the ecosystem can be completely separated from it either. And of all times, this had to happen near the end of the month. I suspect relatively few users had active vaults at the time. But USDA holders and liquidity providers were also affected, so it's hard to call that a relief when people have lost money. Separately, this is something I've felt for a long time: the ecosystem's response in situations like this is disappointing. If the attacker addresses and suspected fund flows had been shared with the first official announcement, users could have worked together to trace the exploit and check for further risks. It would also have helped them assess their own exposure and decide what to do with their assets. But the initial announcement left out the addresses and routes needed to make those assessments and respond. I think the confirmed findings could have been shared, with the speculative parts clearly labeled as such. I understand that the Stacks ecosystem has a lot to navigate right now. Even so, these are exactly the moments when I'd like to see information shared early so the community can respond together. During the Cetus incident on Sui, multiple dApps stepped up alongside the foundation to coordinate a response. I think it matters to keep showing who is doing what, how they are working together, what progress has been made, and what still needs to be resolved. As a user, seeing that process gives you a sense that "even when something goes wrong here, the ecosystem comes together and works through it." I don't like the attitude that seems to treat publicly showing this kind of response as a blemish on the ecosystem. If you want to boast about a strong DeFi ecosystem over the long term, I think you also have to show up when an incident happens. If the position is that this is a decentralized ecosystem and individual projects are responsible for their own affairs, then claiming their DeFi successes as wins for the entire ecosystem whenever things go well is inconsistent. The SEC investigation concerning Stacks and Hiro was also closed in 2024. At the very least, I don't see why sharing attacker addresses, disclosing fund flows, and helping coordinate a response should still require so much tiptoeing. You can't have it both ways. From where I stand, it looks like "we're strong eco" when things go well, and "nothing to do with us" when funds get stolen. If this attitude persists, I believe the long-term cost will be far greater than the money stolen here: the loss of trust in the ecosystem. And it is the users and projects that stay who will end up paying that price.

My Thoughts About zero-gravity:native and iAI iAI has bounced off the lows, but I still think its AI usage is being underpriced. Staking it gives you daily AI credits, which is a pretty practical reason to own it if you already spend money on AI. @AlgodTrading's criticism of Venice's equity<>token structure took some heat out of the trade. But my read is that the concerns around $DIEM have eased a little, and I don't see Venice's runway as an immediate worry right now. Using DIEM around $2,000 as a reference, I still think $400–$600 is a conservative value for the AI usage alone, even after setting aside the collateral a minter can recover. iAI looks more attractive to me on that basis. Its initial terms offer 1.271 AI credits per staked token per day, with a stated usage value above $1, versus DIEM's $1 a day. Looking at that daily allowance, I could make a case for valuing iAI's AI usage at 1.271x DIEM's. But Venice's $65m raise in July deserves some weight too. So even if I stay conservative and give iAI just a 1.05x multiple, that's $420–$630 for the AI usage alone. I still think that's good value against the roughly $367 quoted on Zia right now. Even before assigning any value to the minter's right to recover the underlying 0G collateral, returned as a0G, I still think iAI around that price could be close to a bottom on AI usage value alone. That recovery right stays with the minting wallet; buying iAI on the market gives you the compute rights. The usage value is where I still see a gap. Some people have also raised questions about how long 0G can keep funding the credits, but its recent commitment to invest S$20m in Singapore over five years makes me more comfortable on that front. To me, it suggests enough runway to absorb the ongoing credit costs and keep building the service. For people who use a lot of AI and will actually consume the credits, the entry looks attractive to me. Taking @0G_labs's recent activity in Singapore and at KBW into account, I think this is a reasonable bet if you size it around what you're prepared to lose and have a clear exit plan if it doesn't work out. I'm planning to use mine for language practice and writing on Brunch.

그래그래 챗지피티 pro 500불 요금제야 어서오고

1 SOL 주고 과세유예 알바 뽑고 오는 길입니다! 물론 제가 세금 내기 싫은 것도 당연히 있지만, 그거만큼이나 진지하게 지금 세금 걷으면 한국에서 크립토 산업 자체가 활기가 확 끊길 거 같다는 생각이 많아요.. 혹시 보시는 분들은 금액이 중요한 게 아니라, 참여자 수가 중요한 거니 1$ 어치씩이라도 동참해주시면 정말 큰 힘이 될 것 같습니다. 총대 매는 게 절대 쉬운게 아닌데, 응원합니다!

올해의 마케팅상 우승! 로고 달아드려요~ 연례행사인 KBW + TOKEN 2049가 다가오고 있습니다. 한 인도 KOL은, "내가 행사 3일간 입고 다닐 드레스에 로고를 붙이고 다니려고 하는데 연락줘!" 라고 했습니다. 이 마케팅은 매우 큰 어그로를 끄는데 성공했고, 이 KOL은 모든 로고를 $9200에 완판하는 데 성공합니다. 한편 한국에서도 크게 주목받는 베리에이셔널(@variational_io)DL 뜨거운 심장을 차지한 모습인데.. 👀👀👀 저는 이왕 이런거 할꺼면 당연히 제일 좋은데 해야한다고 생각하긴 합니다. 아무튼 이 크립토 씬은 자기가 기발한 아이디어만 있다면 언제든 주목받을 수 있는 진짜 몇 안되는 곳중 하나라고 생각해요!

주식 & 코인을 무료로 에어드랍? - 스톡코인 제네시스 카드 20장 래플! 엠버가 키우는 IPO & 주식 거래 플랫폼 스톡코인에서 제네시스 NFT 딱 500장을 발행합니다. 카드 소유자에게는 카드 홀딩 90일 이후 XRP, 삼성전자 토큰화 주식 에어드랍을 비롯한 다양한 혜택을 순차 제공한다고 해요. 저는 지금까지 스톡코인에서 오픈AI 청약, 스페이스X 청약 등에 참여해 공모주 청약 느낌으로 꽤 달달한 수익을 얻기도 했기에 꾸준히 IPO 청약에 참여하려고 하고 있습니다. 당첨된 후에 스톡코인 측에서 따로 연락드릴 예정이고, 당첨되신 후에 가입하셔도 되니까 일단 신청해놓고 당첨만 기다리시면 에어드랍이 지갑으로 쇽쇽~👍 아직 인지도 덜할때 제네시스 카드 받아두시는 거 추천합니다! 제 전용 풀 20장이 따로 있으니, 아마 신청하시면 왠만하면 애드 받으시지 않을까 싶어요! 💡 참여방법 1. 스톡코인 X 팔로우 (@stockcoinai) 2. 머니스택 X 팔로우(당연히 하고 계시죠!? @MoneyStack9 ) 3. 1분 컷 구글 응모 폼 작성(채널 코드 란에 'MONEYSTACK' 입력 ) 댓글란에 구글 폼 있습니다!

👀 요즘 진짜 대호감기업 1등이 한화인듯 불꽃축제 때문에 하는 말이지만, 한화는 진짜 돈을 쓸 때 시원시원하게 잘 쓰고, 문화적 기여도 크게 잘하는 것 같음. 얼마전 퐁피두 한화 센터 가봤는데, 진짜 작품들도 다 너무 비싸고 좋고 의미있는 작품들도 컬렉션 잘해왔더라구요 이런 이벤트 후원만으로도 한화덕에 많은 국민들이 일년에 한두번은 웃지 않았을지 👍🏻 구마랑 우쓰도 시원하게 사주고.. 감사합니다 김승연 회장님 오래오래 사세요