Postdoc @UCBerkeley @BerkeleySky |๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐Ÿปโ€๐Ÿ’ปPrev @google, @MSFTResearch, @SpotifyResearch | ๐Ÿ“š@UWaterloo | Interested in Information Retrieval

Berkeley, USA
Joined April 2017
So excited to share that I received the SIGIR Early Career Research Award! ๐Ÿฅน I still remember attending my first SIGIR, watching someone receive this award, and thinking, โ€œThereโ€™s no way that could ever be me.โ€ And now, here I am!๐Ÿ˜ต This truly means so much to me. Thank you to the @ACMSIGIR community for recognizing my contributions. #SIGIR2026 P.S. Get yourself a PhD supervisor who matches your award-celebration energy ๐Ÿ˜„ So cool to celebrate this moment together! @claclarke
22
5
1
100
12,046
1/ ๐Ÿ’ฐMulti-vector retrieval shouldnโ€™t charge you by the token! ๐ŸŽ‰ Excited to share FLINT (Fixed-budget Late INTeraction), a late-interaction retriever designed for long, complex queries with up to 89% reduction in index and 23-170ร— faster retrieval latency.โšก ๐ŸŽ›๏ธ FLINT gives a vector-budget knob to balance storage, latency, and quality. ๐Ÿ“„ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.27273 How does it work? ๐Ÿงต ColBERT stores and compares one vector per token. FLINT pools every query and every document into a fixed number of vectors, so thereโ€™s far less to store and far fewer comparisons at search time.
2
2
9
316
4/ We evaluated FLINT with different backbones on general retrieval benchmarks like BEIR and more complex retrieval tasks in BrowseComp+, TREC Tip-of-the-Tongue, and CRUMB. we also explored impact of vector budgets of 16, 32, and 64. ๐Ÿ“„ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.27273 ๐Ÿ’ป Code: github.com/hmk55555/FLINT ๐Ÿค— Models: huggingface.co/collections/hโ€ฆ Huge thanks to @matei_zaharia and especially @HimankHanda for leading this work ๐Ÿ”ฅ
1
1
36
cc the late-interaction crew: @lateinteraction @bclavie @antoine_chaffin @raphaelsrty @macavaney @ManuelFaysse Curious to hear what you think!
2
37
Negar Arabzadeh retweeted
๐Ÿ“ข ๐—”๐—”๐—”๐—œ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ง๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ต๐˜† ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—”๐—œ ๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€: ๐˜ผ๐™ฃ ๐˜ผ๐™œ๐™š๐™ฃ๐™ฉ ๐™Š๐™ฅ๐™š๐™ง๐™–๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™Ž๐™ฎ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ข ๐™‹๐™š๐™ง๐™จ๐™ฅ๐™š๐™˜๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ซ๐™š ๐Ÿ“ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒฬ€๐˜€, ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒฬ๐—ฎ๐—น, ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ ๐—™๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฎโ€“๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฏ, ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿณ (one-day workshop, exact day TBA) AI agents now continuously evolve. How do we keep them trustworthy? ๐Ÿ’ก ๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—บ? Many failures come not from a broken model, but from a bad memory, an over-privileged tool, or an update that cannot be undone. Operating systems ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ solved this long ago. We bring that lens to agents, making their evolution ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ, ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ ๐Ÿ“Œ ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ ๐Ÿง  ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† (File systems): provenance, isolation, rollback ๐Ÿ› ๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜€ & ๐—ฆ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ (Permissions): least privilege, sandboxing, revocation ๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€ & ๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ (System updates): versioning, no silent alignment drift ๐Ÿค ๐— ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜๐—ถ-๐—”๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ (Process isolation): stop one failure from spreading ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (Logging): trace every failure to the change behind it ๐ŸŽค ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ & ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐˜€: @Yoshua_Bengio (UdeM, LawZero, Mila), @MengdiWang10 (Princeton), @du_yilun (Harvard), @hugo_larochelle (Mila), @ZheqingZhu (Pokee AI), and @yzhao010 (USC). โฐ ๐—ž๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐——๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ & ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐Ÿ“ Submission deadline: Nov 20, 2026 (AoE) ๐Ÿ“ฌ Author notification: Dec 2, 2026 (AoE) - Full papers: 8 pages; Short / position papers: 4 pages - Double-blind review, AAAI format ๐Ÿ”— ๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ: trust4rsi-agent.github.io/AAโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: openreview.net/group?id=AAAIโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“ข ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฝ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ? Contact us at [email protected] Happy to organize with @NegarEmpr, @HuaWenyue31539, @BangL93, and @lcharlin. Big thanks to the support and advisory from @StevenYuan666, Yankai Chen, Tianyu Shi, @BokwaiHo, @preslav_nakov, Steve Liu, @alex_pentland We look forward to seeing you in Montrรฉal! ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ #AAAI2027 #AIAgents #TrustworthyAI #AISafety #LLM #CallForPapers
4
4
344
Excited to be co-organizing our Trust4RSI-Agent Workshop at #AAAI2027 ! A Workshop on Trustworthy Evolution of AI Agents! ๐Ÿš€ ๐ŸฅณWe have an amazing lineup of speakers and panelists: @Yoshua_Bengio , @MengdiWang10 , @du_yilun , @hugo_larochelle , @ZheqingZhu , and @__yuezhao__ ! ๐Ÿ“ Submission deadline: November 20, 2026 ๐Ÿ“ฌ Author notification: December 2, 2026 ๐Ÿ“ February 22โ€“23, 2027 ยท Montrรฉal, Canada ๐ŸŒ trust4rsi-agent.github.io/AAโ€ฆ Please share with colleagues working in this space and looking forward to your submissions! Happy to be organizing this alongside @Haolun_Wu0203 @HuaWenyue31539 @BangL93 @lcharlin! #AAAI2027 #AIAgents
3
20
3,796
Had a great time presenting DeepScholar-Bench at #COLM2026 today! Lots of interesting conversations and interactions! ๐Ÿคฉ If youโ€™re building a deep research system, give our benchmark a try! @COLM_conf has been such an engaging and fun conference so far! ๐Ÿ™Œ
3
1
56
3,163
Today at #COLM2026 I will present DeepScholar-Bench and how we can evaluate AI-generated research synthesis! ๐Ÿ“ Imperial Ballroom, Poster #72 ๐Ÿ•š Today, 11 AMโ€“1 PM Come stop by! Would love to chat!
5
26
1,778
Negar Arabzadeh retweeted
Agent Swarms are scaling to 1000+ agents, and your message board gets congested. Who builds search for them? #COLM2026 ๐Ÿ“Lifelong Agent workshop (Friday)
5
20
462
I'll be BARTing over to #COLM2026 this week ๐Ÿš‡๐Ÿ˜„ Around all week and happy to chat about search agents & deep research systems! ๐Ÿ“„ Thu: DeepScholar-Bench arxiv.org/abs/2508.20033 ๐Ÿ“„ Fri: Multi-Agent Transactive Memory @ Lifelong Agents Workshop arxiv.org/abs/2606.19911
1
4
2
47
6,120
Negar Arabzadeh retweeted
For IR folks: @xueguang_ma and I quickly tested Jev as a pointwise/pairwise/setwise/listwise reranker on the classic DL19 and DL20, reranking the top 100 BM25 results. It is pretty good and cheap.
1
13
4
83
6,448
Negar Arabzadeh retweeted
Quick intro video on ๐Ÿ’ฐHarnessTax๐Ÿ’ฐ is out!! I also shared some thoughts on what it means for our community to be aware of such cost in coding agents at the end!
Claude Code vs Codex vs Pi: which coding agent wins? @melissapan, PhD candidate at UC Berkeleyโ€™s Sky Computing Lab and previous @arena intern, explored the hidden โ€œharness taxโ€: how the system surrounding an AI model affects its cost and performance. She reports three surprising findings. One: harness choice impacts cost more than accuracy. To learn about all three findings, and what they mean for building useful coding agents on realistic budgets, check out the full video here: youtu.be/4R8qZGtEnAE
8
11
1
123
15,265
Negar Arabzadeh retweeted
Could long-context architectures โ€œfind all contradictionsโ€ in a science literature? Not yet! ๐Ÿงต We study a new class of "high-complexityโ€ tasks whose difficulty scales quadratically with corpus size (as opposed to linearly), reversing common LCLM decisions! (block-sparse attention, hybrid modelsโ€ฆ)
15
69
8
339
61,077
Negar Arabzadeh retweeted
Impressive paper showing how much the first retrieval step matters for deep research agents. It helps to improve GPT-5.5 from 83.1% to 90.5% on BrowseComp-Plus with the same retriever and the same agent loop. It seems that the gain comes from the opening context. The authors propose Question's Gambit which runs once, before the agent starts searching. It splits the question into clues, turns each clue into complementary searches, pools the results, and reranks them. The agent then starts its loop with that ranked set already in context. The same change lifts GPT-5.4-mini from 68.1% to 79.0% and DeepSeek-v4-pro from 71.4% to 76.9%, and roughly halves calibration error for GPT-5.5. It costs between 2.3 and 5.3 extra tool calls per question. In an error analysis, only 3 of the 79 remaining GPT-5.5 errors come from the gold document never being retrieved. The other 76 happen later, when the agent previews, opens or uses the evidence. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.14412 Chat with Paper: academy.dair.ai/papers/questโ€ฆ
23
20
1
128
13,987
Thanks @omarsar0 for sharing our paper before we even got the chance to! ๐Ÿ™ Loved your framing so much we borrowed it for our thread "same retriever, same agent loop, just a better opening move. โ™› "
Impressive paper showing how much the first retrieval step matters for deep research agents. It helps to improve GPT-5.5 from 83.1% to 90.5% on BrowseComp-Plus with the same retriever and the same agent loop. It seems that the gain comes from the opening context. The authors propose Question's Gambit which runs once, before the agent starts searching. It splits the question into clues, turns each clue into complementary searches, pools the results, and reranks them. The agent then starts its loop with that ranked set already in context. The same change lifts GPT-5.4-mini from 68.1% to 79.0% and DeepSeek-v4-pro from 71.4% to 76.9%, and roughly halves calibration error for GPT-5.5. It costs between 2.3 and 5.3 extra tool calls per question. In an error analysis, only 3 of the 79 remaining GPT-5.5 errors come from the gold document never being retrieved. The other 76 happen later, when the agent previews, opens or uses the evidence. Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.14412 Chat with Paper: academy.dair.ai/papers/questโ€ฆ
1
5
14
1,050
1/ Weโ€™re excited to share Questionโ€™s Gambit module for search agents. โ™› ๐Ÿฅ‡Question Gambit got first on the BrowseComp-Plus leaderboard for recall with BM25 as our only retriever! ๐Ÿ“ˆ It focuses on the first retrieval move in search agents and got 96.6% recall with about 6 times fewer agent search calls. Same BM25 index. Same agent loop. Just a better opening move. ๐Ÿ“„ Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2609.14412
5
8
1
40
5,155
3/ High recall isnโ€™t enough. The agent has to use what it finds. With GPT-5.5, Pi-Serini surfaces 94.4% of gold documents, but opens or cites only 56.1%. Questionโ€™s Gambit raises these to 98.1% and 75.9%. A much larger gain in evidence use than in retrieval.
1
1
7
249
4/ Finally, we're proud that Question's Gambit is the top academic submission on BrowseComp-Plus, at 90.5% answer accuracy. And we're honored to share the top of the leaderboard with @allen_ai @ai2_allennlp , @sailresearchco , and @mixedbreadai . ๐Ÿ™Œ And of course, thanks to the whole BrowseComp-Plus team for maintaining such an interesting benchmark! ๐Ÿ™@xueguang_ma @zijian42chen @luyu_gao @haora @ShengyaoZhuang @crystina_z @beirmug @lintool @WenhuChen ๐Ÿ“œ: arxiv.org/pdf/2609.14412 ๐Ÿ’ป : github.com/radinhamidi/Questโ€ฆ From amazing team: @radin_hrad @amin_bigdelii @sadjadeb @claclarke @ebrahim_bagheri @bfung123
1
7
206