Pinned Tweet
NEW BOOK! NEW BOOK!
It’s always lovely when a new book comes out. My latest - AWFUL AGATHA RUNS WILD - is out now.
So proud of this trilogy.
Awful Agatha is not really awful. She’s a funny, brave girl dealing with tough issues. A personal favourite.
Happy reading 😉
This is what a Singapore-linked company may be doing with - and contributing to - the haze instagram.com/reel/DegemQQP2…
Neil Humphreys retweeted
Hang this in the Louvre.
Neil Humphreys retweeted
TIME Magazine has released the full, unedited transcript of its interview with Trump alongside its cover story I put in the comments. I had to take several breaks to get through it, it's bad, really bad, because it's our President. If you've ever visited a loved one in a Memory Care facility you'd know the residents can give hours long dissertations without saying anything of substance, long strings of filterless free association that could lead anywhere. While Trump has always been a narcissist and a con man, he was also an effective communicator, you can't pull a successful con without that skill. What we see in this interview seems to be truly disturbing and we need to face it together as a nation and do something about it. Please take the time to read.
time.com/article/2026/10/01/…
🚨🎙️ Gary Neville on UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s comments about Manchester City:
“I find those comments absolutely staggering. At a time when Manchester City have just been found guilty of serious financial rule breaches, the Prime Minister is talking about how concerned he would be if their owners left. What message does that send?
Are we now at the stage where money, investment and tax revenue matter more than the integrity of football? Because if that is the message coming from the top, then we have a serious problem.
You cannot have one set of rules for the smaller clubs and another set of rules for the biggest and wealthiest clubs. If the rules have been broken, they must be dealt with properly. It doesn't matter how much money the owners have brought into Manchester.
And let me be very clear — nobody should be influencing the independent process. The courts, regulators and football authorities must be allowed to do their jobs without political pressure.
If Manchester City escape meaningful punishment simply because they are economically important, then forget sporting integrity. Every club in England will ask themselves why they should respect the rules.
The Premier League cannot become a competition where the bigger your bank account, the safer you are from consequences. That would destroy the credibility of English football.
I think the Prime Minister needs to clarify those comments, because right now they sound like he is more worried about losing Manchester City’s owners than protecting the integrity of the Premier League.”
Neil Humphreys retweeted
When I wrote about this image rights sham for The Independent in 2018, Manchester City threatened to sue us and demanded I tweet out a personal apology on here. We fought them. They did not sue us.
City's sham is confirmed by the Premier League today independent.co.uk/sport/foot…
It's worth noting that Manchester City fans paid actual money for a banner lauding the work of a high profile barrister.
The man in question, Lord Pannick, went on to win 1 (one) out a possible 115 charges.
Pannick in the streets of London, indeed.
Neil Humphreys retweeted
Manchester City underreporting incomes & Salaries means England has lost hundreds of millions of Pounds in taxes.
Neil Humphreys retweeted
To illustrate Man City's aggressive, intimidatory approach to journalists asking Qs, here's a piece from last Dec, paywalled then, now free. Docs & legal letters show process.
REVEALED: Manchester City legal letters where the main aim was to get me sacked
sportingintelligence832.subs…
Neil Humphreys retweeted
Every glib, arrogant, virtue-signalling celebrity who’s broadcast the lie that kids will kill themselves if not allowed to transition deserves to have this read aloud to them non-stop through a megaphone for a year.
A landmark Finnish study has found a sharp rise in psychiatric illness among adolescents following sex-alteration procedures.
The peer-reviewed study, published in Acta Paediatrica, tracked every young person under 23 who contacted Finland's gender clinics between 1996 and 2019.
A total 2,083 individuals were studied, with 16,643 matched controls. They were followed for up to 25 years.
Finland's health registers are mandatory, which means no one opts out — this is the complete national picture.
The numbers: psychiatric morbidity rose from 9.8% to 60.7% in adolescents who underwent feminising reassignment, and from 21.6% to 54.5% in masculinising reassignment.
Even after adjusting for prior psychiatric history, gender-referred adolescents faced five times the risk of male population controls, and three times the risk of female controls.
"Psychiatric needs do not subside after medical gender reassignment," the authors concluded.
Referrals after 2010 arrived sicker. 47.9% had already needed psychiatric treatment before their first clinic visit, against 15.3% among controls.
The authors' read: for some adolescents, gender distress may be secondary to other mental health challenges.
The evidence keeps mounting. The silencing continues anyway.
How many more adolescents will be told this is "care"?
Neil Humphreys retweeted
In my lifetime there’ve been 15 US presidents: some good, some useless, but all except Nixon worked within the rules. Only one of them could have evoked a headline like this. theguardian.com/us-news/2026…




























