if I will it and God will's it, then so shall it be.
Working at the chum bucket
Joined November 2022
- Tweets40.5K
- Following712
- Followers3.9K
- Likes40.5K
Pinned Tweet
Last month, I made around $500 on Content Rewards by clipping music campaigns on TikTok.
I took some profit and bought an itel solar power tank to power my TV and fan, then used the rest for feeding.
and I have like 100$ pending this month to claim.
May not be much to some people, but being able to make money online and use it to take care of some basic needs means a lot to me.
Grateful for the opportunity. 🙏
😲 +$223 from a single campaign
Gm all
I just made $223 from a campaign with a $3k budget, while my friend in the USA made $376.
The campaign ended last night, and the budget is exhausted, but the team said they would refill it. So, we wait.
I want to turn this X account into a clipping alpha hub.
If you’re looking to make money from clipping, make sure to follow me and turn on notifications.
Please I dont go to my dms, if you have any questions about clipping ask me here, I will answer you.
Let’s cook together 🤝
Another day, another set of clips approved, with some still pending approval.
$70 & $64, and the earnings are still adding up.
God, thank you for running this smoothly. I also pray that you bless the agency I clip for with more deals. Amen🙏
56 more followers to hit 4k, can I do that before this month end?
I am happy for all this 3 figure wins, I really appreciate it
But man it's high time this turns to 5 figure wins and am work hard towards that.
I want $1m in sitting in my wallet..
Another day, another set of clips approved, with some still pending approval.
$70 & $64, and the earnings are still adding up.
God, thank you for running this smoothly. I also pray that you bless the agency I clip for with more deals. Amen🙏
56 more followers to hit 4k, can I do that before this month end?
Netokrypto retweeted
Another day, another set of clips approved, with some still pending approval.
$70 & $64, and the earnings are still adding up.
God, thank you for running this smoothly. I also pray that you bless the agency I clip for with more deals. Amen🙏
56 more followers to hit 4k, can I do that before this month end?
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Another day, another set of clips approved, with some still pending approval.
$70 & $64, and the earnings are still adding up.
God, thank you for running this smoothly. I also pray that you bless the agency I clip for with more deals. Amen🙏
56 more followers to hit 4k, can I do that before this month end?
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
$1.5k before the month ends? 🤔
Thank you, God. 🙏
Not much, but honest work. My sweat and blood.
Why am I posting this? I’m trying to reach 4k followers on X before the end of the month. Follow my journey, and if you have any questions, drop them in the comments. Let’s win together.
Main account: $680 + $260 = $940
Second account: $147 + $29 = $176
Total: $1,174
Could have been way more, but some of my clips weren’t reviewed before the campaign budgets ran out, leaving them pending.
And yes, I only clip on TikTok.
I also won a $60 giveaway from Content Rewards this month, but I haven’t received the payment yet. @alexxgrowth
I also got a clipping gig from @CieloLiu. If you’re a good clipper, you can DM her on X.
Netokrypto retweeted
$174 in the space of yesterday and today 🔥
Gm all, hope I’m not late.
> $83 came from my second clipping account.
> $91 came from LayerBank yapping last year.
All have gone straight to my savings.
How did you start your day?
Please don’t forget to check out my Starknet post below. Let’s see if we can make the top 30 on the Kaito leaderboard. 🫡
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
$174 in the space of yesterday and today 🔥
Gm all, hope I’m not late.
> $83 came from my second clipping account.
> $91 came from LayerBank yapping last year.
All have gone straight to my savings.
How did you start your day?
Please don’t forget to check out my Starknet post below. Let’s see if we can make the top 30 on the Kaito leaderboard. 🫡
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Netokrypto retweeted
Cookie don burst my aza 🫢🔥
If you participated in LayerLabs last year, go check your wallet for some stimmy.
Thank you, Lord, for this meal 🙏
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Cookie don burst my aza 🫢🔥
If you participated in LayerLabs last year, go check your wallet for some stimmy.
Thank you, Lord, for this meal 🙏
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Netokrypto retweeted
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
One final thought on Starknet and cryptographic agility.
I’ve talked about quantum threats, programmable accounts, and why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But there’s another important part of this conversation.
Who decides how quickly a blockchain can upgrade its core security?
@Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, which means some aspects of its broader security architecture depend on Ethereum and its migration timeline.
If cryptographic standards need to change in the future, those dependencies matter.
This is one reason Starknet is exploring an independent L1.
Greater autonomy could give Starknet more control over its core security upgrades and when they happen.
That doesn’t mean moving to an L1 automatically makes a network quantum safe.
It means having more control over the decisions involved in preparing for future threats.
And that’s the bigger lesson I’ve taken from exploring Starknet’s approach to cryptographic agility.
Security isn’t just about the technology we trust today. It’s also about having the flexibility to respond when that technology needs to change.
Starknet is preparing for potential quantum threats, but the work is ongoing.
Want to learn more? Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
I am still in my lost and lost and lost and lost phase
I don't have $200k in my wallet yet
Won and won and won and phase soon
Gm all
Please if this post reach you do well to engage the quoted starknet post below 👇
Have a wonderful day 🫡
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Netokrypto retweeted
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Netokrypto retweeted
You post on TikTok and get hit with “Your video is not eligible for recommendation in the For You feed.” 🤦♂️
Gn everyone
This will be my last post for the day.
In just 2 months of clipping, I’ve made $1k+ 🔥
Tomorrow, I’ll be sharing a guide on how to avoid getting that annoying Your video is not eligible for recommendation notification when posting your clips on TikTok.
So make sure you follow me and turn on notifications. You don’t want to miss this 👀
Also, please like and comment on the quoted Starknet post below. 👇
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
You post on TikTok and get hit with “Your video is not eligible for recommendation in the For You feed.” 🤦♂️
Gn everyone
This will be my last post for the day.
In just 2 months of clipping, I’ve made $1k+ 🔥
Tomorrow, I’ll be sharing a guide on how to avoid getting that annoying Your video is not eligible for recommendation notification when posting your clips on TikTok.
So make sure you follow me and turn on notifications. You don’t want to miss this 👀
Also, please like and comment on the quoted Starknet post below. 👇
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Netokrypto retweeted
I almost forgot to post this
Abeg, make una help me check. E be like say my time no correct 🤔.
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
I almost forgot to post this
Abeg, make una help me check. E be like say my time no correct 🤔.
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
What if the biggest threat to crypto security is something we haven’t fully anticipated yet? 🤔
Quantum computing could challenge some of the cryptography we rely on today.
And advances in mathematics could uncover weaknesses we didn’t previously know existed.
That’s why I think crypto needs to think beyond the security standards we use today.
It needs a plan for what happens when those standards need to change.
With @Starknet , there are two important pieces to understand.
> First, its programmable accounts can support new signature methods without requiring a network wide upgrade.
> Second, its STARK proofs use hash based cryptographic techniques designed around a different security approach from traditional elliptic curve signatures.
These serve different purposes, and neither means every part of the system is automatically protected against future quantum threats.
There’s still work to do, including broader migration considerations and dependencies related to Ethereum.
But preparing before a threat becomes urgent is a conversation the entire crypto industry needs to take seriously.
The future of crypto security won’t depend only on the strength of today’s cryptography, but also on our ability to adapt when things change.
Learn more through Starknet’s Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co/
Netokrypto retweeted
Yesterday, I talked about why crypto needs security that can evolve.
But how does that actually work on @Starknet 🤔?
Think of your crypto wallet like a door.
Your signature is the key that authorizes access.
If that key system becomes vulnerable, you want to be able to upgrade it without rebuilding the entire house.
That’s where Starknet’s programmable accounts come in.
They allow developers to introduce new signature methods without requiring a network-wide upgrade.
But there’s an important distinction: signatures authorize transactions, while STARK proofs verify computation. They serve different purposes.
As quantum computing advances, the ability to adapt cryptographic methods could become increasingly important.
Starknet isn’t claiming to be fully quantum-safe today. It’s preparing for a future where security requirements may change.
Because in crypto, security isn’t just about what works today. It’s also about being ready for tomorrow.
Explore the Starknet Quantum Hub 👇
quantum.starkware.co
What happens if the cryptography protecting your crypto wallet becomes vulnerable🤔?
Would the entire network need to be rebuilt🫢?
With quantum computing advancing, this is something crypto needs to think about before it becomes a real problem.
And it’s not just about having strong security today. It’s also about being able to adapt when things change.
This is one thing I find interesting about @Starknet.
Its programmable accounts make it possible to introduce new signature methods without needing to upgrade the entire network.
Think of it like changing the lock on your door without rebuilding the whole house.
There’s also another side to this.
Since Starknet operates as an Ethereum L2, some of its security upgrades still depend on Ethereum and its upgrade timeline.
Exploring an independent L1 could give Starknet more control over its security decisions and how quickly it implements changes.
To be clear, Starknet hasn’t solved every quantum related threat.
But preparing for a future where today’s cryptography might not be enough is a step worth paying attention to.
Because the real question isn’t just how secure a blockchain is today.
It’s how easily it can adapt when that security is challenged.
Explore Starknet’s Quantum Hub: quantum.starkware.co/
