Is no one worried about the censorship and centralization risks a Google oracle creates for LayerZero? In this environment, it seems very easy for Gary to call up Google and say "hey guys, I'm going to sue you if you validate messages that touch this defi protocol". Or even worse is the DOJ calling up saying "this block touched this DPRK address and you're liable if you validate it". Do we really think that Google would fight this instead of just turning off their LZ oracle? I suppose LZ will respond saying "it's ok, protocols can always switch oracle providers via governance". But like... that's not very satisfying. Do we really want to promote using a centralized solution until it gets "turned off"? I'm all for partnerships with big tech, but I think we're supposed to hold each other accountable for maintaining our ethos of decentralization. Unless I'm missing something, this feels like an unacceptable vector for censorship and centralization.