Well this is cool.
Enjoy.
As well as playing the opening set, @MeganHenwood will be joining us for some songs during our set too. Here’s a little video of the two of us running through one possibility ahead of the tour.
Hope to see you there: steveknightley.com/shows
NigelParryMusic retweeted
I miss Econ Twitter, so I'm launching my new Substack to provide a space for us to have a serious conversation about Anti-Fascist Economics.
✉️ Subscribe now - isabellamweber.substack.com
This sounds cool.
Replying to @HogEyeMen
@HogEyeMen performing as the Cutty Sark's shanty crew, will be singing #seashanties aboard ship.
11:45am - 2:00pm, on Saturday 3rd October.
There is an entrance fee. @CuttySark @RMGreenwich
This ad against #Enshitification is just genius!
Trust the Norwegians.
youtube.com/watch?v=d6SPV4GZ…
What a super cool opportunity for school kids in the Wellington region:
sites.google.com/view/shanty…?
#SeaShanties #FolkMusic
NigelParryMusic retweeted
Funny how most people's idea of 'heaven' is an untouched paradise, with enough food for all, where everyone is equal and can live in peace and happiness, but here on earth it's considered a radical leftist ideology.
NigelParryMusic retweeted
someone once asked me why I cared so much about the environment.
I just said, “I live here.”
They looked at me like it had never occurred to them that I’m part of it too.
RIP Dolly Parton, thanks so much for the music.
Also, a shining example of what you can do when you're rich. Hell, what you SHOULD do when rich - supporting the next generations, not indulging in mega yachts, rockets and secret lobbying/'political donations'.
I truly believe that one of the worst things you can do to a kid is tell them they can't sing.
thespinoff.co.nz/society/08-…
NigelParryMusic retweeted
Government poised to ram through reckless demolition of environmental protections
greenpeace.org/aotearoa/pres…
I saw a post on Reddit that said, “When you walk through a museum, you’re not just looking at art. You’re moving through centuries of people trying to explain love, grief, power, beauty, and belonging.” I don’t think I’ve ever seen a museum described so beautifully.
NigelParryMusic retweeted
Anthropologist Margaret Mead was once asked by a student what she believed was the very first sign of known civilization. The student expected her to talk about a hatchet, perhaps fishhooks, the bow and arrow...
Possibly a building structure, clay pots or grinding stones and knives.
But no.
Mead said that the first sign of civilization in an ancient culture was a thighbone that had been broken and then healed.
Mead explained that in the animal kingdom, if you break your leg, your timely death is assured.
"You cannot run from danger, get to the river for a drink or hunt for food. You are meat for prowling beasts. No animal survives a broken leg long enough for the bone to heal."
A broken thighbone that has healed is evidence that someone has taken time to stay with the one who fell, has bound up the wound, has carried the person to safety and has tended the person through recovery.
"Helping someone else through difficulty is where civilization starts." Mead said.
We are at our very best when we truly help and serve others.
Be civilized. Be kind. Be helpful
Such a sad and sudden loss.
Here's my pick for the favourite #GlenHansard song;
youtu.be/k8mtXwtapX4?si=OIHj…
Some beautiful songs here. Some bangers. Some favourites. #Music #NewZealand #Aotearoa
100 best songs.
rnz.co.nz/life/music/2026-wa…
Very good points here.
People defend capitalism because they confuse it with commerce. They believe “capitalism” is when people start businesses and sell things.
If people understood that the thing they call capitalism and love so much is actually just commerce and that it’s not the same thing as capitalism, they would feel very different.
This is because a local baker selling bread, a mechanic fixing cars, or an artisan selling wares on a digital storefront is a sign of commerce in a market economy, which is simply a mechanism for exchanging goods and services based on supply and demand.
Needless to say, this has existed for thousands of years before capitalism was created.
As economic historian Fernand Braudel pointed out, commerce and capitalism are not only distinct; but historically, they have often operated at cross-purposes.
According to Braudel, ordinary commerce is competitive and transparent, while capitalism is anti-competitive and deliberately opaque, making it a zone of privilege held by a small elite who bend the rules in their favour.
Braudel further argues that commerce, or the market, is horizontal, transparent, and competitive and as old as civilization itself. It involves individuals or small groups trading goods, where barriers to entry are low, no single player dominates, and profit is a reward for fulfilling a specific need.
Capitalism, meanwhile, is a specific institutional arrangement that emerged relatively recently in human history, around the 16th to 17th centuries. It is NOT just people “trading stuff”. It is instead the legal and financial system where the means of production are privately owned, and the primary objective is the continuous, infinite accumulation of capital.
Because of this accumulation-obssessed nature of capitalism, when it scales up, it seeks to eliminate the free play of commerce to protect its investments. True market competition is risky for massive capital as it drives prices down and threatens profit margins.
Braudel contended that capitalism only begins where commerce ends. It is the zone of high finance and state collusion. Because it operates across vast distances such as the 17th-century spice trade, information takes months to travel, which creates a deliberate lack of transparency.
Braudel noted that the great capitalists of the early modern era in Madeira and Venice or the Dutch East India Company, never wanted to compete in a fair, transparent market because competition slices profit margins to the bone. Instead, they secured royal charters, exclusive trading rights, and naval protection. At the same time, the state granted them legal monopolies, effectively outlawing competition.
Therefore, capitalism naturally trends toward creating monopolies and securing state interventions like bailouts, subsidies, and regulatory capture to shield itself from the very market forces it claims to champion. In fact, the most important takeaway from Braudel’s analysis is that capitalism is NOT the natural evolution or the highest form of the free market, it is its dark shadow.
So, when our lizard overlords use “free market” and “capitalism” interchangeably, they’re deliberately hiding this distinction and using the moral legitimacy of the hard-working, transparent business owner to defend the structural privileges of the protected financial elite and its regulatory capture.
If ordinary people could comprehend these distinctions, many self-described “capitalists” would realise they are just pro-commerce, and actually anti-capitalist, because it would be clear that defending “capitalism” means defending the right of a small parasite class to bypass the market entirely.


















