Pinned Tweet
"This may be a graduate class, but it's still called Algebra, so we're doing the quadratic formula on the first day!" --me, apparently
I posted a paper to Hexagon!
Historically math papers were written for two somewhat contradictory reasons:
1. For other people to read.
2. To carefully verify that the claims are true.
With AI these don't have to be done in the same paper anymore!
Both of these are slightly disappointing "negative" results. I was hoping to actually find a new tensor category! But this also means I think the second paper is useful even if you don't read it, because it tells you not to bother looking in this particular direction.
Two things Claude does (that ChatGPT didn’t do) that I find very charming:
1. Suggesting that I email or talk to specific mathematicians about questions. (“The simplest way to find out is to ask him.”)
2. Saying “my memory is” if it hasn’t checked something against the text.
If the weak positive form of NS problem is true (Statements A/B) *and* the weak negative form is true (Statments C/D, as claimed by OpenAI), can you still get $1m by solving the former?
Noah Snyder retweeted
You Can See Everything has some elements that feel like a Knives Out film from a different universe.
*chooses words carefully*
Right down to the magician-detective having a female assistant to think with of uncertain complicity.
Noah Snyder retweeted
"Elizabeth Holmes isn't interesting, she's just a scam artist" is totally BS, scam artists have always been fascinating
Noah Snyder retweeted
Replying to @robinsonmeyer
phone: the screen of isolation. tv? the screen of friendship.
Noah Snyder retweeted
>even sam altman would provide global UBI if openai reached singularity
if you believe this you have a level of gullibility and lack of reality testing in the domain of political economy that if it applied to activities of daily living would qualify you for a conservatorship
Noah Snyder retweeted
Man it would have been so nice if we had lived in the timeline in which companies were primarily interested in building AI tools that collaborate with and help people, rather than in building autonomous tools to replace and disempower people. Has always been the wrong goal
Noah Snyder retweeted
if humans manage to keep control over asi, it most likely will not be you or someone who deeply cares about your interests
I can't take it anymore. There's too many papers. Every result is posted twice. It's exhausting. We need to pace the frontier.
kelly clarkson: the store said that Molly wasn’t for sale and treated me like i was julia roberts in pretty woman
art play brooklyn: actually that’s not the truth kelly
benoit blanc: fascinatin…and this was, you say, a $15,000 animahtronic burd? this intrigues me…
Noah Snyder retweeted
It’s really an A+ troll by Zelenskyy to take out half of Russia’s bot farm, weeks before the US midterm elections.
Noah Snyder retweeted
Replying to @alz_zyd_
It's not that puzzling at all. Mathematicians care much more about quality vs quantity. OAI has all the resources in the world to properly verify/present their results, but instead they took shortcuts because they don't actually care about mathematical understanding or community













