Pinned Tweet
🚨We just partnered up with @Otaku_USA Magazine and from today you will find Bobu x Lost Art on over 100 HMV stores across the UK as a magazine bundle.
What else have we done so far?🧵
GM ☀️to those who RENGA @RENGA_inc
Rui retweeted
Meet Eye of the Storm ⚡️ Indra
Lightning’s blessing. Every other Domain’s nightmare.
#FracturedDomainsReveals @AzukiTCG
The NFT project that raised millions.
Collections that once reached floors of 60+ ETH, 10+ ETH and 3 ETH.
One of the biggest and most engaged audiences in Web3.
And then… almost complete silence.
Today, those same collections sit around 0.9 ETH, 0.02 ETH and 0.02 ETH.
Guess who?
@Memeland
For years, Memeland’s leadership has largely disappeared from the community, occasionally resurfacing to promote a new product or initiative.
Before I go any further, I want to make something clear:
This isn’t a hate post.
Memeland has been financially good to me. I’ve met a lot of great people through the community, and I’ve hosted several Memeland events simply because I genuinely loved the project.
This post comes from frustration and from multiple attempts to speak directly with the team.
I don’t think Memeland is a rug.
I also don’t think the team is sitting around doing nothing.
They are clearly building.
So what went wrong?
In my opinion, two things:
Communication and the lack of a clear Web3 strategy.
Here’s my understanding of what is currently happening:
• MemeStrategy is doing… something. The explanation seems to be that because it’s a public company, they can’t talk much about it. Fair enough but public companies communicate what they’re building all the time. We all know what Apple does.
• RWA — they appear to be building a product that lets people store, tokenise and potentially borrow against TCG assets. I actually think this is very interesting.
• Grade10 continues to run events, particularly in Asia.
• They appear to be opening a physical shop selling Potatoz and other products.
• They’re producing some genuinely cool Potatoz animated shorts on Instagram.
And for the record: I still love the Potatoz art.
So there IS activity.
Which makes the silence toward the original Web3 community even more confusing.
Where I think things went wrong:
For some reason, much of the content appearing on Instagram never makes it to X or Discord.
That makes absolutely no sense to me.
Either there is a serious breakdown in communication strategy, or the Web3 side of Memeland simply isn’t considered important anymore.
Neither option is particularly encouraging for holders.
A large proportion of the people who worked on the NFT collections also appear to have moved on.
And then there was Captainz.
After holders waited so long for the reveal, I simply don’t think the artwork delivered.
I respect the decision to experiment. Taking creative risks is good.
But one of the biggest criticisms of the original collection was repetition and lack of differentiation and somehow the reveal repeated the same problem.
Then the narrative shifted from PFP to TCG.
I actually don’t hate that idea.
The reveal mechanic was fun and turning Captainz into a card-based ecosystem could have been interesting.
But if you’re building something inspired by TCGs, you need enough visual variety, characters, factions, lore and world-building to support it.
Where was that plan?
Where was the lore?
Where was the character development?
Where was the game?
It felt like the narrative came before the product strategy.
Then came the experiments.
Stakeland — interesting idea. It didn’t work and now appears effectively dead.
MemePay — another experiment that doesn’t seem to have gained meaningful traction.
Acetrader - dead.
Experimentation itself isn’t the problem.
Web3 companies SHOULD experiment.
The problem is that there doesn’t seem to be a coherent thread connecting these experiments back to Memeland, its NFTs or the people who funded and supported the ecosystem in the first place.
And then there’s the community.
This might be the biggest issue of all.
There barely feels like there is one anymore.
And that shouldn’t be surprising.
I respect Ray’s business acumen and ability to sell a vision.
But when he said he effectively paid to learn Web3 by buying a lot of NFTs, I couldn’t help thinking:
If you build in Web3, the biggest lesson isn’t how to buy NFTs.
It’s understanding communities.
You cannot build a Web3 ecosystem and then disappear from the people holding your assets.
Right now, meaningful engagement with holders feels nonexistent.
For me, the Captainz reveal was the moment that crystallised the problem.
Watching it live, the energy just felt wrong.
Ray seemed unfamiliar with parts of the interface. Stats was casually eating on camera.
Maybe those details mean nothing individually.
But after holders had waited so long for one of the biggest moments in the project’s history, it felt symbolic of something bigger:
The urgency was gone.
The frustrating part?
I actually think their broader vision could work.
RWA, TCG infrastructure, physical retail, entertainment, IP development there is potentially a very interesting company being built here.
But that vision could take years.
And if you’re asking people to keep capital tied up in digital assets while waiting years for that vision to materialise, you cannot ask them to operate on blind faith.
You need communication.
You need transparency.
You need a roadmap even if that roadmap changes.
You need to explain how the NFTs fit into the bigger picture.
And most importantly, you need to give holders a reason to believe they still matter.
Blind faith isn’t conviction.
It’s stupidity.
So what now?
If Memeland genuinely wants to move away from NFTs and focus on RWA, TCGs, retail and other businesses, I think they should simply say it.
Be transparent.
Tell holders where NFTs sit in the company’s priorities.
And if the reality is that the NFT collections are no longer strategically important, then perhaps the cleanest option is to formally sunset that side of the ecosystem rather than leaving holders waiting indefinitely for a comeback that may never be the priority.
Because the worst strategy isn’t failure.
It’s silence.
Memeland still has something most projects would kill for:
Recognisable IP.
Capital.
Distribution.
Experienced founders.
A huge historical audience.
And thousands of people who once genuinely cared about the brand.
Empty promises that they are working on communication… they never do.
The question isn’t whether Memeland can build something successful.
The question is whether the community that helped build Memeland will still be there when they do.
I don’t think so…
🐛 The DIVIT is your key to STACKING REWARDS! 🎁
And we're starting with a reward of our own!
🎁 BUGZ NFT GIVEAWAY! 🎁
ONE lucky winner will receive a Bugz NFT from our
Un-Vault!
Here's how to enter:
🧡 Follow UnVault
🔁 Repost this post
🏷️ Tag an NFT collection you'd love to see using the DIVIT!
Now, how does the DIVIT work? 👀
1️⃣ Hold DIVIT-eligible NFTs
2️⃣ Opt in
3️⃣ Follow your collection's rules (like DON'T LIST!)
4️⃣ Share your collection's pre-filled DIVIT marketing post on X (once per collection)
5️⃣ Once verified, CLAIM YOUR CRYPTO REWARDS! 💰
🔥 1 eligible NFT = 1 potential DIVIT reward
🔥 69 eligible NFTs = 69 potential rewards 😏
🔥 100? 1,000? KEEP STACKING!
Each collection decides and supplies their own rewards and you'll be able to compare and shop collections on our Divit page.
Every eligible NFT is another opportunity to earn and stack rewards!
Powered by UnVault's internationally patent-pending DIVIT technology.
🧡 How many DIVIT rewards could YOU stack?
Collecting is irrational.
Or at least that’s how it looks if you only measure practical utility.
Nobody NEEDS a rare card, watch, artwork, sneaker or NFT.
But people don’t just buy objects.
They buy identity, status, nostalgia, belonging and emotion.
Consumer psychology has been studying this for decades.
The most powerful brands understand that what people WANT can be far more valuable than what they NEED.
“The flaccid afterlife of the art NFT”
This is a must read old article that made me think about recent events and projects pivoting. Link on the next post.
My take 👇
If NFTs are going to make it, the industry needs to start thinking beyond Web3.
Liquidity is drying up, users are leaving, yet teams keep trying to do everything instead of focusing on what they can actually deliver.
We need more diverse audiences, particularly women, and activations designed to attract people outside crypto.
If you’re spending millions on events, make sure they’re also marketing opportunities to the wider world, not just expensive parties for existing holders.
Most importantly, start hiring talent from outside Web3. People who understand brand building, storytelling, IP and long-term strategy. Ideally people that understand both worlds.
NFTs don’t need more hype. They need vision, focus and execution.
Finally did it!!!
Minted, bathed, feed. Bed time.
It's finally time.
Mint yours today. playwalletchi.com/
1000 Walletchis on Robinhood testnet.
750 available. 1 per email.
Supported by @privy_io. (gud tek)
This is art @RENGA_inc
Any mfer that says they are here for the art and doesn’t hold a Renga is not serious.
Being always on the go this makes me super happy.
Be a good degen and use my referral code: opensea.io/r/Mach000 UTAUKC
Rui retweeted
What a way to start the morning, just wow! All 1/1 auctions have kicked off and "Demon Time" editions are all in collector hands🤯
You all really showed out on this one and can't thank you enough for appreciating my work. Much love!🙏💯🙏
I just claimed 2 Mudwater packs!
That's 20 cards waiting to be revealed. Let's see what I pull. @BoredApeYC
mudwater.bayc.com/claim/s/6d…
Was not seeing this coming.
In one hand I'm happy that the amazing art and animation won't be dormant.
A few things that will definetly work for Invisible Friends:
- Not rugging like the previous owner
- IP development (please hire professionals)
- Distribution
- No token
- Real activations that attract non web3 audiences
- Tied it nicely with web3 holders
- pulling some tricks up
“The flaccid afterlife of the art NFT”
This is a must read old article that made me think about recent events and projects pivoting. Link on the next post.
My take 👇
If NFTs are going to make it, the industry needs to start thinking beyond Web3.
Liquidity is drying up, users are leaving, yet teams keep trying to do everything instead of focusing on what they can actually deliver.
We need more diverse audiences, particularly women, and activations designed to attract people outside crypto.
If you’re spending millions on events, make sure they’re also marketing opportunities to the wider world, not just expensive parties for existing holders.
Most importantly, start hiring talent from outside Web3. People who understand brand building, storytelling, IP and long-term strategy. Ideally people that understand both worlds.
NFTs don’t need more hype. They need vision, focus and execution.
TLDR: NFT art promised to revolutionise the art world, but speculation, hype and crypto culture largely overshadowed its artistic value.
In The Flaccid Afterlife of the Art NFT (July 2025), Victoria Comstock-Kershaw argues:
NFTs were driven by speculation, not art. Projects like Bored Apes and CryptoPunks became financial assets and status symbols rather than meaningful artistic movements.
The traditional art world embraced NFTs opportunistically. Auction houses, galleries and established artists jumped in because they feared missing the next big thing.
NFTs exploited existing collector psychology.
Scarcity, gamification, community and digital identity appealed to generations raised on Pokémon, gaming and collectibles.
CryptoPunks are seeking institutional legitimacy. Their acquisition by the Infinite Node Foundation is presented as an attempt to transform speculative assets into culturally significant heritage.
Community was both the attraction and the illusion. NFTs created genuine social connections, but much of the culture revolved around financial incentives and collective hype.
There was one genuine benefit: Web3 offered artists access to funding and opportunities outside traditional art institutions.
The author’s conclusion
The NFT boom didn’t fundamentally transform art. Instead, it exposed how easily cultural legitimacy can be manufactured through money, hype and institutional endorsement.
It also conflates collectible PFP projects with digital fine art, which are not necessarily the same market.
The most interesting unanswered question: Can NFT collections evolve from speculative assets into enduring cultural brands with genuine artistic and intellectual property value?
That’s arguably where projects like BAYC, Azuki and CryptoPunks should be judged over the next decade, rather than solely by their floor prices.
Source: Plaster Magazine — The flaccid afterlife of the art NFT.
plastermagazine.com/features…





































