SOCIALISM IS NEVER DEMOCRATIC BUT ALWAYS TOTALITARIAN "SOCIALISM cannot be ruled for very long except by TERROR." "As soon as the terror is relaxed, resentment and hostility logically begin to well up against the rulers. The stage is thus set for a revolution or civil war. In fact, in the absence of terror, or, more correctly, a sufficient degree of terror, socialism would be characterized by an endless series of revolutions and civil wars, as each new group of rulers proved as incapable of making socialism function successfully as its predecessors before it." "The inescapable inference to be drawn is that the terror actually experienced in the socialist countries was not simply the work of evil men, such as STALIN, but springs from the NATURE OF THE SOCIALIST SYSTEM. Stalin could come to the fore because his unusual willingness and cunning in the use of terror were the specific characteristics most required by a ruler of socialism in order to remain in power. He rose to the top by a process of socialist natural selection: the SELECTION OF THE WORST." — @GGReisman