@Knifa open is great. Open is also slow. I personally have no objection to proprietary. It can evolve quickly.

@Themarker0 Nope, I don't work for Adobe.

@LIV2 ActionScript doesn't get security updates either. 'Cause it's a language. Browsers and Flash player execute the code, need the updates

Second wind in the conversation. Love it. Keep tweeting folks.

@averybrooks True. But from my POV, the integrity of the narrative is more important than the ability to deep link into specific sections.

@rferreiras There are cases in which cross-language development is useful, but I've yet to see it produce better output than native coding.

@rferreiras My experience has lead me to believe that it is always best to develop in the native language it's going to be published/run in.

@averybrooks anchors are there. They're simply not exposed in the url. This is by design; no section is intended to be read independently.

@josesandoval there's no reason to build it in flash. HTML is the most appropriate tech to use for this type of site. Best tool for the job.

Love some of the conversations I'm seeing on here. Keep sharing the conversation, not the competition. #OccupyHTML

This is worth the read: RT @fwa: The Industry - Thoughts on Flash go.thefwa.com/tZ5Udx - leading award winning agencies express their views

Hey @smashingmag, we're redirecting a movement! #OccupyHTML occupyhtml.org

@OccupyFlash Why don't we embrace the best web technologies available to create the best user experiences possible? occupyhtml.org

I joined the movement to rid the world of the HTML purism! #OccupyHTML occupyhtml.org/ via @OccupyHTML