Tc

In case you don't know the difference.

As the money wasn't left in the bank, which of the basic amenities do we still not lack? I know you understand exactly what he meant, but you've chosen to pretend otherwise because of tribalism. Even in the Bible, the master questioned the servant who refused to put the money entrusted to him to work, asking why he hadn't at least deposited it in the bank to earn interest. No president or governor can solve every problem facing a country or state within eight years. That is precisely why money that cannot be put to productive use should be preserved for those who come after. Look at how extravagantly our politicians live. Doesn't that tell you something about where the money meant to provide the basic amenities we desperately need is going? Now, which would a sensible person prefer? That public funds be stolen by politicians who have no intention of using them for their intended purposes, or that the money be left in the bank for someone with the competence and capacity to put it to proper use? How is leaving public money untouched worse than stealing it while the people continue to suffer?