Werdna

What the fuck?

With a fuckload of loopholes so that they never paid close to that rate. But yeah, if a big sticker number makes you feel good, go for it I guess.

Probably equally supportive - everybody hates these entitled little shits harassing normal working people.

You’re voting for an abomination ideology. Just so you’re at peace with that. They will hunt you and your family down, eventually. Especially your daughter who you determined had dignity in life. They will see her as a body that takes and does not produce. You vote for your own destruction.

Idk, probably just negligent parents that don’t want to feel bad about being negligent parents.

Thanks - yeah if my reflexes suck I’ll probably just not take my 2 year old to a game where a ball could ruin their entire life. Self awareness is important.

…?? You want nets everywhere so you don’t have to watch your kids…? Or what?

Nobody wants stadium nets where they aren’t absolutely needed, ruins the viewing experience. Just pay attention when your kids are at risk is really the fuckin answer.

If you bring your child to a baseball game, it’s absolutely required that you watch your kid the entire time. Are you serious? I’ve taken my daughter to several, had a couple close calls with balls and I was ready (didn’t end up going directly to us). Yes, I’m serious, and yes many parents absolutely pass this test. If you don’t, just don’t take your kids to a game!

Negligent parents - should 100% be on the lookout the entire time.

I didn’t say it’s necessary. My companies AI doesn’t have medical diagnostic data, for example. It just reads schematics for the most part. But it is very useful (and sometimes mortally so) in other circumstances. What we’re discussing here is wether or not AI companies have a duty to protect us from their product and my stance is that it doesn’t have that inherent duty unless that’s what we have purchased the AI to do (like FSD).

It has helped diagnose and save people so yes, theres a clear benefit to having it able to analyze medical data. There’s also the principle that regulators shouldnt be determining what information we get access to. If a company wants to, fine. And we either will or wont use it accordingly.

That’s cool, in practice it’s just discrimination. Seen it, been a part of it, been affected by it. Go fuck yourself for perpetuating discrimination.

Whether a tool has one or not is generally up to the tool manufacturer I.e. kitchen knives are allowed to just be blades that somebody could easily die from. Not the knives fault. Whether they put safety mechanisms in place is generally a “to what degree does this neuter the product” discussion paired with legal disclaimers about the dangers.

Every saw doesn’t have a saw-stop, every blade doesn’t have a blade guard. I’m not saying all safety options are bad I’m saying it’s not the tools fault if a user is retarded and uses it unsafely. If it’s tricky, the tool should have legal disclaimers and a retard proofed option, but if you kill yourself even in light of safeguards put in place, that’s on you.

No, but it’s not a tools job to stop you from killing yourself. A hammer doesn’t have to have a guard to stop you from smashing your own head with it. People think of these tools like they are somehow infallible when anybody who has used one for like 2 minutes knows they fuck almost everything up almost every chance they get.

Team 2

Nothing. An unfortunate reality of life.

Yeah that’s wild.

If this is true, kill them, honestly. That kind of cruelty is deeply ingrained and cannot be reformed.