π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist) header
π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist) profile picture

π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲

@Primevalist

Archeofuturist β€’ Christopagan β€’ Übermensch Prophet ᛉ α›‹ ᚒ α›Ÿ

Joined January 2024
  • Tweets2.6K
  • Following292
  • Followers195
163Media
Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)Photo by π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
If the recent Heidegger discourse has taught me anything, it is that Marxists think only in praxis.
9
Marx didn’t write β€œstop interpreting the world in ways that leave it unchanged.” He wrote that philosophers have only interpreted it in various ways, and that the real point is to change it. The contrast is between interpretation as such and transformative action.
Nicolas D Villarreal (@NicolasDVillar1) profile pictureNicolas D Villarreal@NicolasDVillar120h
I don't see how the fact that Marx has an interpretation of the world somehow makes the sentence unfounded. He spoke against having an interpretation of the world for the purpose of keeping it the same.
3
1
9
1,043
Heidegger was correct. Any call to change the world already depends on a specific interpretation of what the world is and what needs changing. Marx’s famous line therefore undercuts itselfβ€”it dismisses interpretation while relying on his own materialist view.
Guilherme Gomes Santos (@guilherme94jose) profile pictureGuilherme Gomes Santos
@guilherme94joseNov 8
Heidegger criticises Karl Marx:
13
10
2
106
3,773
In shortβ€”Heidegger has *once again* owned Marx.
5
383
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
7
183
Creation is beautiful because something comes to be and destruction is beautiful because nothing is required to remain forever.
71
Mischlings love pretending the achievements of the Ashkenazim are comparable to the Anglo so they can feel better about their racial identityβ€”or lack thereof.
65
β€œJust vote GOP harder! They’re the best we got! Patriots in control! We will win in the end!”
AF Post (@AFpost) profile pictureAF Post
@AFpostNov 9
Trump endorses an amnesty deal with Democrats, saying immigration maximalists are on the β€œpretty far right” and suggesting that illegals who have been in the US for 10-15 years should have an opportunity to stay. Follow: @AFpost
1
137
Genuine erotic, artistic admiration of the nude requires recognizing something *more* in the human form than its capacity to stimulate desire.
2
3
27
461
Baldr is the radiant god of light and purity, slain so the old world can end. His death sparks Ragnarok; his return marks the new earth rising from the fire. Futurism needs the same figure. The pure, youthful ideal cannot coexist with the decaying past. It must be β€˜killed’.
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist) profile pictureπ–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲@PrimevalistNov 8
In Norse legend the world ends in fire and battle so a new one can be born. Gods die, the old order burns, and renewal rises from the ashes. Futurism demands the same ruptureβ€”an overflow of ruin and revivification.
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
1
1
12
343
In Norse legend the world ends in fire and battle so a new one can be born. Gods die, the old order burns, and renewal rises from the ashes. Futurism demands the same ruptureβ€”an overflow of ruin and revivification.
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
1
1
6
432
This is just untrue. Michael Parenti, Albert Szymanski, Grover Furr, Domenico Losurdo, Roland Boer, Vijay Prashad, and Samir Amin are all among western-based/trained Marxist intellectuals which defend multiple aspects of historically Communist states.
Π±og πŸ‡°πŸ‡΅πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί (@SmokeMedicOpana) profile pictureΠ±og πŸ‡°πŸ‡΅πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί@SmokeMedicOpanaNov 8
Replying to @Primevalist
Ur forgetting the fact that every single "Marxist" academic villainize all historically Communist states like the USSR, China, and DPRK which are literally the countries he's talking about in the clip.
6
241
I’m all for this post-midterm right wing restructuring.
3
121
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
1
104
The argument that National Socialism is somehow less villainized than Marxism is laughable. β€œb- b- but nazis are portrayed as alluring!!” is ridiculous cope considering Marxism has an institutional presence while Nazism is effectively shunned. Why do Marxoids even bother?
RedGearSolid ☭☰ βš™οΈπŸ¦‡πŸ“‘ (@RedGearSolid) profile pictureRedGearSolid ☭☰ βš™οΈπŸ¦‡πŸ“‘@RedGearSolidNov 7
Haz Al Din hands down.
4
18
482
This is ridiculous. Stephen Miller won’t change anything. We will be getting no mass deportations. We didn’t get them when Republicans controlled the House and the Senate, what makes you think we’ll get it now? I swear the tiniest little things get these people happy.
Fugitive Caesar (@ThomBrady5) profile pictureFugitive Caesar
@ThomBrady5Nov 7
I have full confidence in Stephen Miller's leadership in the face of this crisis. We are back on the team and ready for battle, sir.
1
122
America as a nation is so severely detached from whatever ideal society the founding fathers had in mind that it may very well be unsalvageable.
1
1
10
1,400
I’m considering it…
Image from π–•π–—π–Žπ–’π–Šπ–›π–†π–‘π–Žπ–˜π–™ 🌲 (@Primevalist)
31
16
5
332
7,180
In what world was Hegel’s work mystical? There is nothing mystical about his workβ€”it is pure rationality. Hegel said it himself: β€œWhat is rational is actual, and what is actual is rational.”
Alexander Dugin (@AGDugin) profile pictureAlexander Dugin@AGDuginNov 7
Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit is one of the most mystical work. We need to wake up inside the dream.
2
176
Those who invoke Spengler’s concepts to celebrate the supposedly limitless potential of Western civilization misunderstand the very distinction upon which his philosophy rests. The Faustian drive is exactly what exhausted Western man. We should be intensely anti-Faustian.
Alexander (@AlexNHorner) profile pictureAlexander
@AlexNHornerNov 7
The reason why "Gay Techno Fascism" is gaining so much motion and popularity right now is because all existing "right-wing" movements are incredibly boring, stagnant and in many cases actively regressive: - AF is third world christcuck trad larp - Return to nature and Raw primal is super boring and anti Faustian - Right Wing populism/MAGA is low IQ and dead now - Neo Folkish and NS larping is childish, unrealistic and destructive So the young white man in the West is looking for something else. Something exciting, something ambitious, something unapologetically futuristic and anti-egelitarian. He doesn't want to spend his life fantasising about an idealised medieval village or pretending that industrial civilisation was a mistake. He wants a future that excites him: skyscrapers, AI, space colonialization, technological supremacy, radical ambition, fulfilling our faustian destiny,... This is where the appeal of the so-called tech right becomes obvious when you combine things like Nick Land's accelerationism, Thiel's hostility towards institutional stagnation, the obsession with escaping existing political structures and the idea that technology could fundamentally transform the human condition all tap into a desire that the conventional right has entirely abandoned. There is something so deeply Faustian about this entire outlook: the refusal to accept the limits of the present and the desire to transcend the human condition. Also the aesthetics are absolutely peak. And then there is the gay aspect (it's obviously more of a meme but there's still a reason why it's part of it). With the incel question and a completely dysfunctional dating market it's hardly surprising that some are turning away from the conventional dating game altogether. For some the appeal lies in building a social world that doesn't revolve around seeking female validation or navigating an increasingly hostile "romantic marketplace". Call it what you want but the techno-futurist right at least has the audacity to imagine something radically different.
7
204
I’m much more epistemically Kantian than I realized.
61

No more items