Google just published its official guide for AI Search.
What they say to ignore:
- llms.txt: useless for Google
- Content “chunking”: useless
- AI-specific structured data: useless
- Artificial mentions: detected, penalized
What still matters: non-commodity content, a crawlable site, clean technical structure.
AEO and GEO = SEO. Google says it straight.
🤖 Made with AI
This GPT Image 2 prompt is going insanely viral right now.
“Redraw the attached image in the most clumsy, scribbly, and utterly pathetic way possible. Use a white background, and make it look like it was drawn in MS Paint with a mouse. It should be vaguely similar but also not really, kind of matching but also off in a confusing, awkward way, with that low-quality pixel-by-pixel feel that really emphasizes how ridiculously bad it is. Actually, you know what, whatever, just draw it however you want.”
🏮 @linear scores 8.0/10 on QueryLantern.
SEO - very strong.
AEO - solid.
GEO - room to grow.
The interesting part is not the overall score.
It is how uneven the layers are.
That gap is getting harder to ignore.
Quick example.
Notion scores 8.2/10 on QueryLantern.
SEO is strong. AEO is the weaker layer.
That is exactly the kind of gap the tool is built to surface.
For a long time, auditing a page meant answering one question.
Can it be found?
Today, that is no longer enough.
A page can rank, be technically sound, and still be weak on AEO, GEO, and AI visibility.
That is exactly why QueryLantern exists.
Free. No sign-up. Link in bio.
Replying to @Jimmynakapie @alphabot










