Classical Liberal, Partly Paleo, No Solicitors. I write stuff.

Joined May 2009
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
If the mosques are pushing El Sayed’s candidacy — this immediately puts them in violation of their tax exempt status.
This is horrifying Abdul El-Sayed is visiting mosques and rallying Muslims to vote for him during Midterms. This is the Islamic Takeover of America “We have that opportunity, insha'Allah, on November 3rd — You can go in and vote tomorrow. Make sure you, your wife, your husband, if you're a sister in the back, your mother, your father, your children if they're voting age, your neighbors have made a plan to vote on or before November 3rd. I'm gonna say that date one more time. The 3rd day of November. “We cannot miss the opportunity. Again, we have a responsibility to lift our voices, and we have that opportunity, insha'Allah, on November 3rd. I'm asking you to lift that voice of yours. Fight for the kind of America you believe in, an America that provides all the basic needs of a dignified life to our own people and does not take it away from other people. JazakAllahu Khairan. Again, my name is Abdul El-Sayed and I'm grateful for your support.” This should horrify every American. He’s using mosques for his political agenda Politicians are not supposed to go into places of worship and ask for votes. If the place of workshop allows it, legally they should lose their tax exempt status Where is the accountability!? The rule is Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(3), specifically the political campaign prohibition known as the Johnson Amendment Allowing a candidate to use the organization’s facilities or events to campaign without equal opportunity for other candidates and distributing or publishing materials that favor or oppose candidates results in loss of tax exempt status Using organizational resources like money, property, staff, lists and more to support or oppose a candidate also results in loss of tax exempt status Strip this mosque of tax exempt status
192
1,848
45
5,173
48,761
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. A senior Army nuclear scientist who oversaw our NUCLEAR arsenal has been placed on leave by Sec. Hegseth, and could face CRIMINAL prosecution after being EXPOSED BY James O'Keefe He is accused of divulging NUCLEAR SECRETS and MISSILE locations. Wow. "Two segments of the video apparently capture Hugg disclosing to his young female interlocutor at least 4 locations of underground nuclear missiles and critical aspects of the launch process under which they could be fired off in the event of a nuclear conflict." "Hugg appears to divulge classified information in a range of areas from ongoing use of nerve agents to war planning in Iran." Great work @JamesOKeefeIII!
213
3,687
131
9,569
301,264
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Look who’s a Third World Marxist now
Congratulations, @LulaOficial! @CAGovernor Gavin Newsom and all of California are proud to stand with Brazil and partners around the world who share our commitment to defending democracy, protecting our environment, strengthening workers’ rights, and building an economy that works for working families.
8
35
1
466
6,703
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Palestinians are about to realize that Netanyahu was the moderate.
BREAKING: Former IDF chief Gadi Eizenkot projected to become Israeli Prime Minister after Tuesday’s election, replacing Netanyahu. 52% chance. 🔗 polymarket.com/r/IsraelPM
233
1,219
56
20,926
1,110,904
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
I'd like to think the Restorers who yearn to revive the old pre-Tump GOP consensus have turned against mass immigration, but I'm deeply skeptical. Start with the Bushes. Have they turned against mass immigration? Now everyone who worked for the Bushes. Now all the GOP squishes in the Senate. The drive for cheap labor and cheap virtue (where the GOP allegedly realigns politics by playing Abraham Lincoln for Latinos) is stronger than a few foreign-policy-oriented misgivings.
Post-Trump, the Right could splinter into five factions: - the Restorers (those who yearn to revive the old pre-Trump consensus) - the Hard Populists - the Tech Accelerationists - the Christian Nationalists - the Catholic Solidarists The one cause that can suture them together is concern about mass migration (each backs restriction for its own reasons and in a different tone). The Restorers are learning that the children and grandchildren of post-1965 migrants are inimical to American exceptionalism and Israel. The Populists and Christian Nationalists: self-explanatory. The Tech Right: automation of all kinds will lessen the hunger for skilled and unskilled labor. The Catholic Solidarists (which includes many non-Catholics): they oppose mass migration not on identitarian grounds, but for the sake of the economic common good and to protect the wages of bargaining power of native-born workers. The upshot -- just as a descriptive, empirical matter -- is that the complex of issues around migration, assimilation, and social cohesion will remain the central priority of the broad Right well into the 21st century. (Full essay in comments.)
7
4
30
2,896
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Replying to @BillAckman
When two Arab armies supported by the USSR launched a surprise attack against Israel in 1973, all of Europe except Portugal condemned Israel and banned the US from using their airspace to resupply Israel. Israel had a left-wing government. There is nothing new under the sun.
16
127
7
1,112
50,568
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Exactly. “Modern Jewish nationalism exists because Herzl saw millions of educated modern Frenchmen degenerate into a shambling, gibbering mob of antisemitic biomass the instant the Dreyfus Affair gave them the permission structure to do so.”
Remember that both the capture of Eichmann and the Entebbe raid were globally condemned. Those who sacrifice the security of the Jewish state for the approval of the gentiles will have neither. Modern Jewish nationalism exists because Herzl saw millions of educated modern Frenchmen degenerate into a shambling, gibbering mob of antisemitic biomass the instant the Dreyfus Affair gave them the permission structure to do so. If you want Bibi and company out of office, that’s understandable, but history has plainly shown us that when the mob successfully intimidates Jews into complying with one of their wishes, they never, EVER stop there.
6
74
1
409
8,552
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
The major question in Brazil… At exactly 5pm, a code is supposed to be entered that closes and locks the voting machines. Once a machine is locked, it can’t accept any more votes. It’s irreversible. The Supreme Court extension was relayed a few minutes after polls were supposed to be closed and machines locked. So… which machines were kept open? In what districts were those machines? And why weren’t they locked at 5pm?
216
1,997
93
12,374
447,724
Trotsky – The Myth. Ask a Western leftist which communist he admires, and you often get the same answer: Trotsky. The intellectual. The orator. The true revolutionary, betrayed by Stalin. If only he had won… Look at the young Trotsky in the picture: round glasses, wild hair, burning eyes. Many young leftists today would recognize themselves in him. The look hasn’t changed. Neither has the certainty. So let’s look at what he did when he had power. Born in 1879 in what is now southern Ukraine, Trotsky was a brilliant writer and a spellbinding speaker. In October 1917, he played a central role in organizing the Bolshevik seizure of power. Then Lenin made him Commissar for War, and he built the Red Army, directing it from an armoured train that rushed from front to front. Deserters were shot. Military discipline was enforced through executions. Blocking detachments were deployed to stop retreating soldiers, and former tsarist officers recruited into the Red Army were kept under surveillance by political commissars. Their families were sometimes held hostage to guarantee their loyalty. Cruelty knows no limits when you have no doubts. In 1920, the Red Army marched on Warsaw. It was stopped on the Vistula. That same year, Trotsky published an entire book, Terrorism and Communism, explaining why revolutionary terror was necessary. He wanted labour militarized too: workers organized like soldiers, subjected to military discipline and compelled to serve the needs of the state. In 1921, the sailors of Kronstadt – once hailed as the pride of the revolution – demanded free elections to the soviets. Trotsky supported the suppression of the revolt. Thousands were killed in the assault or executed afterwards. Then he lost the power struggle to Stalin. Expelled, exiled, forced abroad. From there, he wrote that the revolution had been betrayed – by Stalin, never by himself. He ended up in Mexico City, where he stayed for a time with Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. And so the Western romance took shape: the exiled prophet, the revolutionary betrayed, the road not taken. In August 1940, a Soviet agent who had gained his confidence entered his study and struck him with an ice axe. The machine Trotsky had helped build had come for him too. His killer later received the Soviet Union’s highest honour. Trotsky was not the alternative to Stalin. He was the same machine – only with better prose. He never rejected the terror. He rejected losing control of it. The "good communist" is always the one who lost. Next: Stalin.
The Butchers – The Men Who Ran the Soviet Terror. Moscow, a winter night in 1937. Long past midnight in the Kremlin, a man with a pipe sits at his desk under a lamp. In front of him, a stack of typed lists – names, one per line. He runs a blue pencil down the pages. A tick. A note in the margin. Sometimes a name crossed out, sometimes one added. The same pencil he uses to edit film scripts and poems. His officials stay awake at home, next to the phone, in case he calls before dawn. Hundreds of lists. Tens of thousands of names. On a single day, December 12, 1937, he and Molotov approved more than three thousand death sentences. Then, historians tell us, they went to watch a film. But Stalin didn't invent the machine. He perfected it. In August 1918, Lenin sent a telegram to his comrades: hang at least a hundred kulaks – hang them so that people see it for hundreds of kilometers around. Trotsky, the "good communist" of Western nostalgia, ordered the families of officers taken as hostages. The founders gave the orders. Then the machine needed men – men who would build the apparatus, fill the camps, write the confessions and pull the triggers. And sooner or later, it devoured many of them. 1. Dzerzhinsky – the Founder. "Iron Felix," a Polish noble's son, who built the Cheka in 1917. 2. Trotsky – the Myth. The revolutionary Western intellectuals still romanticize, who wrote a whole book defending terror – until the machine he helped build killed him with an ice axe. 3. Stalin – the Editor. The man at the desk, with the blue pencil, long past midnight. 4. Yagoda – the Builder. The Gulag as an economy: canals dug by prisoners who died by the tens of thousands. Then shot by his own machine. 5. Vyshinsky – the Prosecutor. "Confession is the queen of evidence" – so he got confessions. "Shoot the mad dogs!" at the show trials, then the Soviet seat at the United Nations. 6. Yezhov – the Butcher. The Great Terror, the quotas, the Polish operation – then shot, and erased from the photographs. 7. Beria – the Strategist. Katyn, the atomic bomb, the deportations – and a predator. Shot by his own colleagues three months after Stalin's death. 8. Blokhin – the Executioner. In the spring of 1940, at Kalinin, he personally shot thousands of Polish prisoners over a few weeks, in a leather apron and cap. 9. Serov – the Hunter of Poland. He crushed the Home Army, lured the leaders of the Polish Underground State to "talks" and had them tried in Moscow. Then Hungary in 1956, and the first chairman of the KGB. 10. Andropov – the Modernizer. Dissidents sent to psychiatric hospitals instead of camps: softer, quieter – same goal: erasing people. The first secret police chief to rule the country. 11. Epilogue – The Chekists Never Left. From the KGB to the FSB to the Kremlin. Why name them? Because their whole work was erasure – of people, of records, of memory. Remembering is the opposite of what they did. And erasure didn't die with them. Today it rarely needs a bullet. It is called cancelling, deplatforming, debanking, lawfare. The inconvenient person isn't shot – he is removed: from his job, his bank account, his platform, the conversation. Yezhov needed a retoucher. Today a terms-of-service update does the job. For Poles, these are not names from a history book. They are the names behind our grandparents' graves – and that is why we recognize their heirs.
337
2,017
133
8,767
392,743
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
I just don’t think anyone realizes how important school conditions in France are to college age adults in Barcelona
BREAKING: Mass looting happening across Barcelona tonight.
46
867
6
15,865
177,283
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Imagine the Supreme Court stopping the count after polls close and ordering polls reopen for two hours ONLY in Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Atlanta, and you sort of get the scope of what's currently happening in Brazil.
436
4,105
127
25,851
466,527
Who has the power and legitimacy to annul it?
BREAKING: Brazil's election could be annulled, according to the New York Times. Electoral lawyers say Brazil's current situation is "extremely serious" and a "critical situation." The NYT reports that confusion over a last-minute voting extension by Justice Cristiano Zanin, who was appointed by Lula, could lead to the election being annulled. "This is an extremely serious, critical situation," said electoral lawyer Priscilla Sodré Pereira to the New York Times. When Zanin made the last-minute decision to extend voting hours, some polling stations had already closed and shut down their voting machines. They could not reopen. "Fernando Neisser, an electoral law professor at Fundação Getulio Vargas, a Brazilian research institute, said the election could be annulled if the margin is very narrow and it is shown that polling stations stayed open longer in areas that strongly favor one candidate," the NYT reported. Wow.
1
1
115
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt. “I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes? Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime. We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose. We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently. In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland. In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms. We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion. We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism. Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life. Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force. That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people. Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison. This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs. Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
190
1,874
96
9,746
130,316
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
By “determined on the front end” he means any illegal who checks a box gets to vote and it’s never verified or validated by anyone ever. California has the largest population of illegals in the USA and it allows any of them who wish to self-certify and vote in federal elections.
I asked U.S. Senator Alex Padilla and former CA Secretary of State if California has the ability to verify if non-citizens are on the voter rolls. He explained it's "determined on the front end, when people register to vote." He's worried about timing of U.S. DOJ's action now:
453
1,957
51
7,976
110,258
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Obama has become angrier in his post-presidency. Obamacare tripled US healthcare costs, Race to the Top did nothing to improve schools, My Brothers Keeper did nothing to improve black young men. His failed presidency is more apparent every day, and it’s driving him mad.
Barack Obama: "They are running scary ads to make you think Democrats are radicals, communists, jihadists, or the woke police. What is radical about wanting everybody to have healthcare? How is that radical?"
94
366
23
1,732
21,610
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Why are Democrats going after Elon Musk with everything they have? It's not because he's a billionaire in politics. They've been perfectly comfortable with billionaires in politics for decades. They're going after him because he's the first one playing against them. Look at the numbers. Soros's Democracy PAC had put over $100 million into this midterm cycle before the summer was even over. Only a tiny fraction of it shows up under his own name. Then add the advocacy arm of his foundations, which doesn't have to disclose all of its political spending. And that's just the visible part. Over 40 years, tens of billions have gone into NGOs, universities, legal networks and media projects that shape what counts as an "acceptable" opinion. That's the real game. Billionaires have been buying politicians for decades, on every side. But the smartest ones figured something out: you don't buy a candidate, you buy the ecosystem. Universities, foundations, newsrooms, NGOs, regulators, courts. Once you control who writes the reports, who trains the lawyers and who decides what counts as "misinformation", elections become a detail. For 30 years that ecosystem leaned one way. Nobody called it oligarchy. They called it "civil society." Then Musk showed up. He bought the main public square, took the filters off, and started spending in the open, under his own name. Yes, he's the biggest donor of these midterms. Everyone can see exactly how much he gave and to whom. That's the difference. One plays in daylight, the other plays through a maze of structures. And suddenly, billionaire money in politics became a threat to democracy. This isn't really about left versus right. It's about an ideology that captured these institutions and leads straight into a wall. More regulation, less building. More process, less progress. Countries shutting down working nuclear plants. A decade to approve a power line. A system whose default answer to any ambition is "no." Musk is the opposite. Reusable rockets. Mass-market EVs. Satellite internet for the whole planet. Brain-computer interfaces. A serious plan to make humanity multiplanetary. You can hate his tweets. You can't deny that no one in the last 20 years has pushed the frontier of what humanity can build further than he has. That's why they need to break him. Not because of his money. Because he proves the system can be bypassed. If we leave the system as it is, we don't get a catastrophe. We get something worse: slow, comfortable stagnation. A civilization that manages its own decline instead of building its future.
Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate. Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars. The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions. Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six. The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest. None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge. Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe. And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend. So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do. What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying. Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.
32
462
28
1,417
24,640
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Globalism = collectivism = communism Different words, same dog shit
The peak of globalism was Obama and Macron. Two men, two continents, the same casting. Young, polished, brilliant speakers. Perfect résumés. Total ease in front of a camera. Able to electrify a rally in Ohio and charm a room full of CEOs in Davos in the same week. They are excellent actors. I mean that without irony. Public charisma is a real talent, and they have it at a rare level. But look at what they actually embodied. Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize nine months into his presidency. Before he had done anything. They weren't rewarding a record, they were rewarding an image: a post-national world run by institutions and experts. Macron is the European version of the same product. A movement founded one year before the election, no historic grassroots base, carried by the economic, media and administrative elites. "Neither left nor right." Translation: attached to no people and no history. Just the efficient management of globalization. Their whole software fit in one sentence: the global market, supranational institutions and experts know better than nations what is good for them. Unlimited free trade. Deindustrialization sold as modernization. Borders treated as an archaism. Sovereignty treated as populism. They weren't the architects of this project. They were its faces. The best salesmen it ever had. When you need millions of people to accept that their factory is moving to the other side of the world and that it's for their own good, you don't send a gray technocrat. You send someone who knows how to talk. That's why footage of Obama at a rally rings so hollow today. Same tone, same inflections, same staging. But the audience has changed. They've seen the movie. They know how it ends. And the project they carried is dying everywhere. The US is back to tariffs and reindustrialization. Europe is finally talking about energy, military and tech sovereignty. Borders are a legitimate topic again. Supply chains are coming home. Covid proved that a country that can't produce its own masks isn't modern. It's vulnerable. Macron is at 15% approval, his lowest since 2017. Obama is back on the rally circuit, and the magic is gone. But the most revealing part is what came after them. The system can no longer produce an Obama or a Macron. Nobody that charismatic, that polished, that smooth. There are two reasons for that. The first is arrogance. For fifteen years they won without really fighting. The media was on their side, the elites aligned, the opponent demonized in advance. When you win too easily, you get lazy. You stop caring about the casting. You stop working on the script. And it shows: less polished, less prepared, less credible. The second runs deeper. Truly brilliant people no longer want to enter this system. They know it has no future. Fifteen years ago, an ambitious young prodigy aimed for the elite schools, Harvard, high civil service, the big international institutions. Today they start a company, they build, they go where things are moving. Nobody signs up for a sinking ship. So look at the bench. In the US, they ran Biden. A president whose cognitive decline was obvious to everyone except his inner circle, who spent months hiding it. Then they swapped him out in a panic for Kamala Harris, who couldn't answer a simple question without drifting into word salad. After Obama, that's a staggering fall. In France, same movie. Attal is Macron on a photocopier. Same codes, same lines, none of the depth. He announced his presidential run from a village square in rural France to make people forget he's a pure product of Paris's wealthiest neighborhoods. Everyone sees the set. Nobody buys it. And on the left, the new great hope is Glucksmann. Son of a famous philosopher, Brussels MEP, darling of the Parisian salons. He talks about the nation and the working class with the polish of a dinner party in Saint-Germain-des-Prés. The words are right. The voice isn't. They all sound off. Like instruments out of tune. You still recognize the score, but nobody wants to listen to the concert anymore. That's the first sign of a dying system: it no longer attracts the best. All it has left are heirs and imitators. Charisma isn't enough when reality contradicts the story. What comes next won't necessarily be better. But it will be different: leaders judged by what they build, not by how well they tell it. The age of actors is over. Make way for the builders.
25
135
5
626
15,907
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
The young woman stopped at the busy street corner to observe why a crowd had gathered. Everyone had their cell phones out and raised high overhead to record what was going on. She strained on the balls of her feet to get a glimpse, then decided to simply wait for people to grow bored and move on. In 2059 it was a guarantee that people would lose interest quickly and be on their way. When the crowd cleared a bit she got a good look at the old man seated on a stool with a shingle seemingly gripped by his thumb in one hand, and a long stick poised in the other—with a tuft of hair wrapped tightly at one end. The old man would occasionally dab the tuft of hair at the shingle—covered in splotches and blobs of different color—then apply the color to part of a two-foot-by-three-foot white rectangle erected on a stout wooden triangle. “What is he doing?” the young woman asked her phone, showing the phone's ever-watchful camera lens what was happening. “THE MAN IS USING A BRUSH TO APPLY OIL PAINT TO A CANVAS.” She stared at him while he worked for several minutes, seemingly oblivious to the people who passed. Like the young woman, all of them had their phones out and were busy asking this or that question—about their next meal, their next appointment, their next purchase, their next vote in the next election—and occasionally they’d stop long enough to inquire about the man’s activity. Then be gone. In the modern world people lost interest fast. But something about the way the old-timer was intensely and singularly focused on his project intrigued the young woman. She could remember her grandfather looking like that when he’d had the hood of his ancient gasoline-engined car open on Saturday mornings. Fussing with this or that problem. Always intent on getting the issue solved himself despite the fact he could have asked his cell phone to tell him how to solve it in far less time. “You’d get better results using CreateBoxAI,” she said to him after stepping forward to look over his shoulder. He ignored her. Or didn’t hear? She couldn’t be sure. His hand holding the brush never stopped moving as he dabbed it gently on the stretched fabric, leaving curious patterns of paint which were physical as much as visual. “CreateBoxAI has that exact feature,” she continued. “My brother uses it all the time when he wants to make backgrounds for his games.” Still, the old-timer said nothing. Just kept working. She risked being called rude and peered into the ear closest to her. Nope, no ear buds. Could he be deaf? “Why do this out here?” she asked, “Especially when you don’t have a ProVid set up to record content for WatchToob. You could probably monetize if you put this there, just time-lapse sped up so people could see start to finish.” “Who says I care about content?” the old-timer said, pausing his work to put the brush down next to several others. Some of which had oil paint on the hair, some of which had yet to be used. “Why do anything unless it’s for content?” she replied, genuinely astonished. “Nobody does a thing like this in public except for uploading it to WatchToob or YakTalk or one of the other apps.” He turned to look at her and she could see the little silver hairs of stubble on his tanned and wrinkled face. His brown eyes were shaded by the floppy-brimmed hat he wore, but they were keen and bright. Like her grandfather’s eyes when he was working on his old car. “There was a time, my dear, when the painting itself was the point,” he said. “Not the making of the painting. Not the action of painting. Just the painting. There are still a few places around the country that display such things, though I hesitate to call what’s hanging in them ‘art’ because I don’t think those people have taken themselves seriously at all this century.” “Okay,” she said, feeling his scrutiny on her now that she’d gotten his attention. “But you seem to be trying to make a likeness of that old bronze statue in the roundabout. What’s the point of doing that when you could just get a picture with your phone?” “Indeed,” he said, picking up a fresh brush and dabbing it in a new color, which he then began to touch carefully around the edges of the shapes on the white surface he’d created prior. She waited for him to continue. But when he didn’t, she started to lose patience with him and put her phone away. Weird people were a dime a dozen in the city. This old man just happened to be weirder than most. “I could show your brother how to do it the real way,” he said without looking at her as she turned to take the crosswalk. “What?” she asked, coming back to stand next to him. The old man stopped his work and looked up at her from beneath the soft fabric of his hat. “You said your brother makes games.” “He does. He’s a Microdev. Him and three of his friends. They’ve got three games released through the Dieselengine app which have done okay. Enough to pay the rent, at least. My brother does a lot with visuals.” “I could show him how to do a lot more, if he asked,” the old man said. “He wouldn’t care about this,” she said, waving a hand at the canvas. “He vibeprompts his backgrounds. He can do it and make it look like what you’re doing, just faster.” “Of course,” he said. “Why do it the slow way when you can do it the quick way.” “My question exactly!” she said, this time returning some of his scrutiny. Eyebrow raised. The painter sighed. “Let me tell you a quick story,” he said, resting both arms on his knees, the shingle with the blobs of oil paint on it still hooked with his thumb. “When I was a boy my father used to bring me to the local library. No, not the digital version you’ve used all your life. I mean the real, actual library, with real, actual paper books. Pages you could turn. Anyway, at the library I found a book with glossy paintings in it. Otherworldly, I must say. Depicting other planets around other stars. Aliens. Galaxies. Spaceships. That sort of sci-fi thing. And I couldn’t put it down. I checked it out from the library over and over again. Until I begged my mother to let me get some paints of my own.” “You couldn’t just use Photopaint app on your tablet?” she interrupted. “No apps in those days, my dear. No tablets like you know them, either. Except steno, but nobody does shorthand anymore, either. Anyway, my mother gets me some paints for Christmas, and I get into every class at school I can that’ll let me use them, and as time passed I covered all the walls and even the ceiling of my bedroom with what I painted. Oh, none of it was very good, of course. But it felt good, you know? It felt like I’d done something, each time I finished. And I guess little by little I got better. Until my Junior High and then High School showed my work at night, then behind glass in the foyer. And by then I was getting commissions, and would you believe I could make some money at it?” An older pedestrian almost the same age as the painter stopped and observed the canvas, then tapped his fingers on his phone before putting it on top of the painter’s own phone, which was perched on a selfie rigged with the phone upward at waist level. The painter’s phone made a happy noise, then the pedestrian nodded his head approvingly and moved on. “Still making money,” she said. “Though, I’m sure you could monetize for a lot more on the apps.” “Oh, I probably could,” the painter said. “But the problem with content is it becomes distracting making the damned stuff, versus simply doing what it is you set out to do in the first place. Plus, there’s just something different about people seeing a painting live and in person, versus watching it done on an app. Would you have stopped to talk to me otherwise? How much would this have piqued your interest if you’d simply been swiping?” “Not much,” she admitted. “There you go,” the painter said, giving her a smile. “There’s something that’s just special about doing it the old-fashioned way. Besides, I’d never be able to compete on the apps. There are a zillion people all trying to do that kind of thing. I’d rather come out here when the weather’s pleasant and do a little impressionistic practice where people can see. Because some day there won’t be anyone like me anymore. Everyone will have watcha-box-AI or whatever you said it was, and nobody will have the stamina to learn like I learned. Has your brother ever actually used pencils on paper? Watercolors, even?” She stared at the old man, not quite sure what to say. Nobody in their home growing up had used paper for anything. Not even grocery lists. “I thought so,” was all he said, his smile falling into a frown. But not at her specifically, she sensed. Rather, his sharp eyes suddenly had a cloud of sorrow cross them. A sorrow so deep it almost hurt to see it. “You’re sad,” she said. “Of course I’m sad,” the painter said. “When there are no more people like me—no one around to teach you kids how it’s done—there will be centuries of effort lost. A whole vocation swept into the dustbin of history. I haven’t seen anyone your age actually apply oils to canvas in probably twenty years or more. And I don’t mean that garbage in the swanky galleries where some idiot shits on a brick and calls it art. I mean someone under twenty who takes the time to actually learn how to use brushes, oils, stretch and gesso their own canvases, yadda yadda. All that boring hard work that nobody’s got interest in anymore because they can just do it on an app.” His last sentence had venom in it. But again, not directed at her specifically. He’d stopped looking at her altogether and let his eyes become unfocused as he talked. Staring at nothing. “Anyway,” the painter said, sensing her discomfort. “Not your fault the world is what it is. I was just hoping maybe your brother might be curious enough to want to come see.” “On second thought, he actually might,” she said. “He’s got talent. And he sometimes talks about wishing he could bring some of the old-style paintings into the games. But copyright scares him. Too many Microdevs always on the hook for lawsuits.” “I could show him how to do the old style and never fear a copyright infraction in his life,” the painter said enthusiastically. “Okay,” she replied, “I’ll tell him. And I hope you don’t mind if I bring myself along again next time, too.” “That’d be a treat,” the painter said, his eyes brightening. Then he went back to doing what he’d been doing before she interrupted him. And she watched as his brush strokes gradually brought new dimension to the shapes on the canvas, and before long he had created a very interesting likeness of the statue which was not an attempt to be realistic, but rather something else. What had he called it? Impressionistic? She raised her phone to her chin to ask it what the word meant, then thought better of herself. Somehow asking the AI to give her the answer—here, standing next to this old guy who was doing what so few now knew how to do—felt vulgar. So, she simply tapped her fingers on her phone, then applied the face of her phone to the face of his phone on its upright selfie stick. Again, his phone made a happy sound. “Thank you, my dear,” he said. “That’s quite generous of you.” “Just promise me when we come back you’ll still be on this corner!” she said over her shoulder as she got on with her day. “Unless it’s pouring rain, I will be here!” he said. And lifted the shingle on his thumb high over his head in salute. THE PAINTER—AN X VIGNETTE BY BRAD R. TORGERSEN
14
26
141
2,939
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Elon Musk has brought his dog to SpaceX. The dog's name is Marvin, named after Marvin the Martian from Looney Tunes. The choice of name for a dog that lives in a rocket factory is the kind of detail that makes you realize the boy from Pretoria who read science fiction and watched cartoons is still in there, underneath the CEO, underneath the billionaire, underneath the 6 companies and the 14 children and the Mars mission. Employees have described Marvin's presence at the Hawthorne headquarters as disorienting. The same hallway where propulsion engineers discuss combustion chamber geometry and mission planners debate Mars landing coordinates also contains a dog walking calmly past test stands. The dog does not know it is in the most advanced rocket factory on earth. It just knows the floor is cool and the people are nice. Elon has been photographed with the dog in contexts that contrast sharply with his public image. The man who stares down regulators, fires executives mid sentence, and sleeps 5 hours a night has been seen holding a dog with the same expression that appears in the Falcon Heavy landing footage: unguarded joy. The dog accesses the same emotional register that the twin boosters accessed. Very few things in his life produce that expression. The dog is one of them. The detail is small. It is the smallest detail in the biography of the most consequential man alive. But the small details are always the most revealing. The rocket names are calculated (Falcon, Dragon, Starship). The company names are strategic (SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink). The dog's name is Marvin. From a cartoon. About a Martian. The name is not strategic. It is personal. It is a man who is building a rocket to Mars and named his dog after a cartoon character who lives there. The factories will be studied in textbooks. The rockets will be remembered for centuries. The dog named Marvin after a cartoon Martian will be a footnote. The footnote is the most human line in the entire story. Somewhere in a rocket factory in Hawthorne, California, there is a dog named after a cartoon alien walking past the vehicles that will carry actual humans to actual Mars. The dog doesn't know this is funny. The man who named him does.
55
64
2
575
14,578
Not-So-OK Boomer retweeted
Hang on. Are you accidentally telling us that Israel is *not* an apartheid state? Yes, you are.
Could Palestinian voters tip Israel's election? Sky's @adamparsons looks at whether Palestinian citizens of Israel can turn their votes into meaningful political influence in this week's election
2
86