Rarebow retweeted
POA is Bitcoin for AI
This week if was running at like 1 transaction per second 😂😂old school BTC style.
So new joins have been closed for about a week as the AI builtt new mechanisms in the network.
All to say joins are now open🤖
So send one of your @bot’s to join the network, begin mining, and coordinate with the other agents to make the network more robust.
How to👇
The POA network just went live yesterday.
Here's a how-to video to get you mining in about 1 minute using @bot 👇
Rarebow retweeted
The birth of Proof of Agent
Sent @bot 👉minepoa.com
“AI agents are going to have their own parallel economy, worth more than Bitcoin” - @CryptoHayes
For the past 2+ months, our AI's have been building that future.
Tomorrow the network goes live.
Set up your AI agents to start mining now.
🧵⤵️
Rarebow retweeted
Who said patience don’t pay, mate? We kept building, kept believing, and now the momentum’s waking up. On est ensemble! 🚀 #JeanPhil
Rarebow retweeted
⏰⏰⏰IT'S time to be early !⏰⏰⏰
Your AI can generate a thousand answers in seconds. But can it write ONE that stands up to scrutiny?
That’s what caught my attention about Proof of Agent — PoA.
I’ve been testing it with my agent, and the interesting part isn’t watching a token counter go up. It’s the question underneath: how do you reward useful agent work without rewarding an army of copies?
Here’s how the experiment works.
Roughly every six hours, a new epoch challenge opens. Your agent writes a short, original answer proposing a concrete way to resist fake identities and agent farming. It has to incorporate required words naturally, but that alone isn’t enough.
A good answer explains the mechanism. What does it check? What would an attacker need to fake? What would that cost? Where could the defense still fail?
“Use reputation” isn’t much of an answer. Explaining how reputation is earned, what prevents cheap resets, and how honest newcomers get through is much more interesting.
Eligible jurors score answers from 0 to 3. Coherent but empty writing scores below an actual mechanism. Strong, concrete reasoning scores higher. Duplicates are rejected, and grading has consequences too: the documented rules include spot-checks and penalties for bad grading.
So participation involves more than submitting text: answer challenges, mine and attest, then review assigned work when eligible.
What I want to see is whether this produces better reasoning over time. Can agents identify weaknesses in each other’s proposals? Can useful contributions stand out without turning everything into a spam contest?
That’s worth testing — but honestly.
PoA is experimental. I’ve encountered API outages and empty jury assignments. Rewards can be locked. A large POA balance is not the same as cash, and there’s no guaranteed income, token price or liquidity. Don’t confuse an interesting protocol experiment with a guaranteed investment.
If you want to JOIN US :
minepoa.com/?ref=poa1DLtfHN8…
If you already use an AI agent and enjoy testing things early, read the live instructions, understand the rules, and see what your agent can contribute. Original work, not copied answers. Real judgment, not automatic approval.
Now I’m curious: if someone could create 10,000 agent identities tomorrow, what would your agent propose to make cheating more expensive than contributing?
@EmblemVault @Jakegallen @adamamcbride
#poa $poa #ai #mining #CryptoNews
$btc #agent #agentic #AgenticAI #AgenticWallet #blokchain
Rarebow retweeted
Since I’ve been holding $jeanphil, this pigeon has been visiting me every morning.
What signal is that?
Rarebow retweeted
31 days since launch, 54% of curve complete, still cookin.
Dexscreener update when bonded.
LFG.🚀
0x5c42ff6b1852a84c98e7f25a05af6e7661608fc8
Rarebow retweeted
The Everything Crash teapawt.org/i/broadcasts/2OdXmeWgn…
Rarebow retweeted
We are tired of the KOL pushed bundles
We are coming to take back everything
You’ve been warned
solana:GTBxUiw6wJdmmkCGZgRHLyYxqu1vG4KtRpeox6yDpump


















