Jesus did not simply perform his miracles on unknown strangers that appeared to him in the church without being known by the congregations. Almost in all accounts of his miracles, although he demanded faith of those he healed, the miracles were in such a way that even doubters could verify. When he raises Lazarus from the dead, he goes for a dead person that was known by all to be dead and already stinking. He went there four days after his death and burial, when no one could doubt that we was dead. He asked them to open the grave themselves, and commanded him to rise. When he heals a blind man, he randomly identifies a KNOWN blind man in the crowd and perform the miracle before all. Just like one would heal Buchaman, not a ‘lame man’ who only appears on that day in church unseen by all before. When he turned water into wine, it was at a public wedding, and waited until the wine they had was finished. He asked them to bring water, and the miracle was performed there before all. And they drunk the wine to verify. It was the same case for the fish and bread he multiplied. When Thomas doubted his resurrection, he castigated his lack of faith, but still let him place his finger on his wound to prove. He didn’t end at scolding him. That is why, not many of his detractors would accuse him of faking miracles. Instead, they could only accuse him of using other powers (Beelzebub). The miracles were obvious. He didn’t have to shout himself hoarse explaining them to doubters, or even curse those who challenged him. Even the last time he was challenged by a thief while on the cross (to save himself), he proved to the thief soon after. It is crooks (Pharisees and Sadducees) that respond with guilty anger instead of proof - where the intent is to simply silence those who question them.