Real Canuck (@RealCanuck) header
Real Canuck (@RealCanuck) profile picture

Living on the west coast. We should leave this place better than we found it. Pro-reality, anti-BS.

BC, Canada
Joined April 2011
Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)Photo by Real Canuck (@RealCanuck)
X asks me "What's happening?" at top of page. I have the same question.
2
2
37
3,380
You wouldn’t expect this chart given the rhetoric around the affordability crisis.
Some stats on whether young people are worse off today compared to 25 years ago
1
4
250
Controversial take, and certainly a contrarian one, but I think the Bank of Canada rate hike was the right move. I say that despite the terrible September employment report, which showed the economy losing 68,000 jobs after another 42,000 were lost in August, with unemployment rising to 6.5%. That clearly argues for caution. But beneath the headline, September’s weakness was disproportionately public-sector driven, while private-sector employment actually increased. Meanwhile, credit conditions remain strong and money supply continues to expand. M2 by itself isn't a reason to raise rates, but when money and credit are expanding alongside resilient private-sector activity and persistent inflationary pressures, the combination becomes harder to ignore. The Bank is essentially choosing between two risks: overtightening into a weakening labour market or allowing relatively loose financial conditions to reignite inflation. I think the latter is now the bigger risk. If you disagree, look at the Canadian bank stocks.
34
9
3
103
10,905
BC Conservatives chose the normie to be leader and it worked. Could the fed Cons do the same?
299
Real Canuck retweeted
I have been following the American polling carefully . I can disentangle the dross from the reliable. It's increasingly clear that Trump is going to suffer a major defeat. For me the question shifts from will he be decisively bounced to what sort of anti democratic chaos will ensue
37
85
4
463
19,962
I see comments like this where left voters think the NDP is too right wing. And I see moderate voters who think the NDP is too left wing and Cons too right wing. And I see right voters who say Cons are too left wing. Rather entertaining.
If you want a BCNDP that’s further to the right than it currently is, why not just join the Conservative Party? Honestly? What’s stopping you?
5
506
So your team didn't win and now it's somehow the end of the world? Get some fresh air. We still have Canadians working for Canadians in this beautiful place. #bcpoli
6
477
Turns out appealing to a broad cross-section of voters with a likable leader and a campaign low on grievance but focused on the economy while rejecting Trump and MAGA-style culture war battles paid off for the BC Conservatives with one of biggest majorities in decades.
21
18
5
141
6,641
Wow that’s really bad.
BC under the NDP 2017 to Present Public Sector Job Growth: +54.0% Private Sector Job Growth: +16.8% 2023 to Present Public Sector Job Growth: +30.9% Private Sector Job Growth: +4.1% - Stats Can
1
2
7
681
I miss the 2017 BC election. None of the parties’ candidates openly embraced homophobia, antisemitism, or antagonism to First Nations. The carbon tax was supported by the 3 main parties; the Greens (at the time) weren’t proposing to run a chain of grocery stores. #bcpoli
27
3
1
14
2,768
Would the best outcome be a minority with Greens and Cons working together? #bcpoli
2
2
634
Seems to me that in BC we have a choice between socially literate but economically illiterate OR economically literate but socially illiterate. Why can’t we have both social literacy and economic literacy? #bcpoli
3
2
12
713
Real Canuck retweeted
The BC Greens claim capital flight from their proposed retroactive wealth tax is a “mostly empty threat.” Actual economic research suggests otherwise… A new Stanford study examining California’s nearly identical 5% billionaire wealth tax found: • Nearly 30% of the proposed tax base has already departed • Expected revenue falls from $100B to approximately $30B • Lost future income taxes could exceed the revenue collected. • Estimated net fiscal impact is NEGATIVE $38.9 BILLION. The researchers found a negative fiscal outcome in 85% of their simulations. These are estimates, not final outcomes, but they expose a serious flaw in the BC Greens assumptions. You cannot tax wealth that leaves your jurisdiction. And when wealth leaves, the consequences extend well beyond the tax itself. Ideology doesn’t override economics.
20
29
1
125
5,338
Alberta separatists crying about an oppressive liberal government in Ottawa while driving $120,000 trucks and SUV’s while planning their second Mexico vacation this year.
150
599
32
6,896
134,909
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 🇨🇦
3
41
339
4,061
Good day from Vancouver
1
18
660
Voting for the values you believe in is never wasting your vote @VoteCentreBC
3
15
461
Don’t forget that polls don’t win elections OR separation referendums. TURNOUT DOES. There aren’t enough separatists in Alberta for separatism to win if everyone votes, clearly. But EVERY ONE OF THEM WILL VOTE. If those who oppose separatism DON’T VOTE, the foreign agents win.
Please don’t assume anything, Alberta. Vote against the Russian & American-fuelled separation self-sabotage. Send a strong message to the rest of Canada that we’re in this together. Foreign actors want you to vote for your own Brexit or Trump…or to help them win by staying home. bbc.com/news/articles/cze2dn…
1
40
1
83
6,400
If Vancouver’s election teaches us anything, it’s that voters reject extremes. The left needs to find balance too: progressive policies that are practical, affordable, and grounded in everyday concerns. Otherwise, we’ll keep swinging between extremes instead of making real progress.
55
40
5
265
7,188