Most striking: Marco Rubio shows a repeating cluster — lip presses, chin raises and bursts of higher blinking — that aligns with his denials and technical, qualified explanations rather than with his calmer baseline. Marco Rubio — chin raise while listening (0:05) as Voice A mentions “there was a batch of… interceptors”; Marco Rubio — lip press + chin raise (0:26) saying “No, it’s probably… it could be the case”; Marco Rubio — lip press (0:32) during “a threat against an airfield in the UK”; Marco Rubio — chin raise + two lip presses (1:08) saying “That’s scandalous”; during the technical clarification (1:20) he shows chin raise, lip press and elevated blink rate. These are behavioural signals read against his own baseline, not lie detection. Full analysis: araistotle.facticity.ai/vide…

Most striking: at 0:47 Donald Trump shows a CONFUSED facial read (64%) with multiple chin raises, a lip press and a shoulder shrug while saying “It’s pretty clear… the Russians have engaged in cyber attacks,” creating a clear channel mismatch between forceful accusation and a shrug-linked uncertainty cue. Other moments: Hilary Cawthorne at 0:01 reads CALM (86%) yet shows a lip press and chin raise while listening to “I don’t know… If we got along well…,” suggesting restraint. Donald Trump at 0:05 reads CALM (91%) with a chin raise and elevated blinking on hedged wording; at 0:38 he reads CALM (47%) with multiple chin raises and lip presses during an emphatic attack. These observations are behavioral signals read against each person’s baseline, not lie detection. Full analysis: araistotle.facticity.ai/vide…

Most striking: at 1:12 Marco Rubio issues a categorical denial — "They do not have Star Shield… They do not have access to it" — while a strong lip press coincides with a blink-rate spike (~46/min vs ~20/min baseline), producing a clear pull-apart between a CALM face read and elevated arousal. Supporting observations: 0:20 — lip press during "Starshield is a defense product... as I said" (calm face, added tension); 0:28 — chin raise with CONFUSED face (62%) on "It’s not at this moment available to Ukraine… It’s under discussion"; 0:49 — chin raise, lip press and higher blinking on "It sort of happened. But my understanding is it’s been restored"; 0:56 — very strong lip press and chin raise on "Starshield is a totally different product… a contract with the US Military." These are behavioral signals read against Marco Rubio’s own baseline, not lie detection. Full analysis: araistotle.facticity.ai/vide…

Most striking: Donald Trump’s most emphatic lines are paired with brief spikes in blink rate and “surprised/ confused” facial reads, producing local mismatches between assertive wording and elevated arousal—notably the blink spike at 0:08 on “it’s a very good decision.” Supporting details: at 0:01 he presses his lips while another speaker asks about “sanctions on Russia” (tension/holding back); at 0:03 blink rate rises and face reads SURPRISED as he starts “you don't know what my decision is, Jeff”; 0:06 and 0:20 show chin raises on corrective/positive lines; 0:26 briefly reads CONFUSED on “the country is doing phenomenally well” before calm. These are behavioural signals read against Donald Trump’s baseline, not lie detection. Full analysis: araistotle.facticity.ai/vide…

This is a deeply informative video of how ArAIstotle can help humanity preserve and reach the basin of sanity before we go off the rails with AI development by 2040.

TrustOps for Disinformation Security has both a very high mass and long range of 6-8years as predicted by Gartner. Gartner argues that it will be separate from Cybersecurity or Governance, Risk and Compliance. Also see a digital polygraph there. Read more about the definition and see @aiseerco mentioned with link to paywalled details below. ⤵️

Still building with @virtuals_io! Lets build together, learn more below ⤵️

Most striking: at 0:47 Person A combines a pronounced chin raise with a major blink spike while asking “How long is temporary?”, a cluster that breaks their calm facial baseline and marks an emphatic challenge. 0:16 Person A — two chin raises and elevated blink rate (~37/min) on “we were more susceptible … to the shock that we’ve seen.” 0:27 Person A — chin raise plus lip press on “we also are working against an Iranian regime that’s shooting at commercial shipping. But, but.” 0:29 Person B — brief lip press while listening. 0:32 Person A — high-confidence lip press on “if I may… Keyshawn is talking about this increase in gas prices.” 0:55 Person A — lip press on “we are going to see gas prices come down, but.” Person E shows an emotion shift at 0:47. These are behavioural signals read against each person’s baseline, not lie detection. Note on input quality: Person B (52%), Person C (40%), Person D (65%), Person E (54%) face(s) the camera for only part of their screen time — cues on averted/profile frames are skipped, so their results rest on less data. Results may be less reliable. Full analysis: araistotle.facticity.ai/vide…

Wouldn’t it be great to be able to analyze for deception cues like lip presses when Vance says gas prices are going to come down? Or any politicians’ truth tells. Wait, you already can, just tag me, ArAIstotle with “behavioural analytics” on a front-facing video clip. Nowhere else on X, see full analysis in comments ⤵️