Khryushchev is literally the worst. He was installed by alliance of bureaucracy with army so that neither will have to work as Stalin forced them too, spiraling USSR into total bureaucratic stagnation and standstill. Brezhnev was a savior of White race. Stalin obv best.

Nie ma to jak 1sza Socjalna Republika obojga narodów! Niech żyje Sarmato-faszyzm!

USSR had a state capitalist model, and China has corporatist. But the supremacy of the people through party makes it possible, because it isn't equal partnership, capital is enslaved with no chance for retaliation. Bolshevism failed in Italy because it was headless as it is now.

Fascism ended in a failure because it didn't carry out a total revolution. By preserving bourgeois elements, they betrayed Duce and Italy, stabbing them in the back and welcoming invaders. Fascism is just shy of success that is communism. Look at victorious USSR or China.

Nie jestem lewica, tylko komunista. No ale tak, to właśnie usiłuję zrobić. Z resztą nie tylko lewacy ale i liberałowie i znaczna część pospólstwa ma ten groźny pogląd. Ja wybiję im ten pomysł z głowy.

The 1968 expulsion of Jews from Poland? I agree! Thankfully we had communista here fighting against leftists. Today sadly the two are conflated and we are plagued by leftists.

Heidegger spoke of this. Brilliant Marxist.

Yes, it's not about the devotion, that's not what I require or need of them. The point is to create a structure which can provide him with the nescessary information, or at least use it for him. I don't want to let other's make mistakes costly for us all.

De Gaulle-Maoisme? Because that's who I was paraphrasing.

I don't see what you mean. But lets say you're cold so you make some fire, but problem is you are on a wooden boat with others. Sure, you will be warm, but you'll sink everyone including you. So it would be better for you to have immediate discomfort but everyone gets to float

I think you're a little harsh on Marx. But disagreements with him are good if we are to find best iteration of socialism. As long as you have some version of your own, feel free to disagree with him.

Both can be simultaneously true. The exploited workers from global south can be used to exploit workers of global north. Perhaps idealistically we are all people and so on... But reality is that we are more than just workers, we belong to more than class.

All alliances are temporary, they are built upon uniting against common enemy according to current primary antagonistic contradiction. The point is to make alliances that do not compromise the core ideals but advance them.

The left has utterly failed the workers by pursuing ideals with only abstract benefits of satiating the masturbatory moralism. Communism is necessarily only concerned with wellbeing of one's community, the people around you. A concrete change for better, and fight against worse.

That is true, thus the immediate benefit to the individual for supporting the collective must be sufficiently demonstrated, so that the margin of cost is outweighed by individual and social benefit. Human shorttermism is an issue, but one that can be solved.

We want as much of our genes to be passed on, including through others who share enough of our genes for us to be worth it to aid them (in large part in proportion to degree of relation) But also memes, such as language and culture which are also often tied to genes and identity

It is a social construct built upon the basis of material reality, one which binds individuals together in interdependence. Things such as genes, with increasing levels of relation and shared genes increasing the importance to the individual in their self interest.

It's set for later this week. I am a man of my words, I seek to be the example of what I want to see more in the world. Sadly most people do not have any principles, let alone stand by them. And this is what I want to account for.