Pinned Tweet
It really is the collective moment of our lifetime.
If you’ve never investigated how the world really works and have laid solid foundations in the status quo and what you are spoon fed, history will judge you poorly.
“Question everything” and other wives tales exist for a reason.
What’s really happening with the bond markets
vm.tiktok.com/ZN8UvPV2k/
Reevo retweeted
1. Siri AI now has a memory
This is the headline feature of iOS 27.2, and most people will never notice it.
Before this update, Siri AI was a smart assistant with amnesia. You asked about a dinner spot on Monday, and by Thursday it had no idea what you were talking about. You had to start from zero every single time.
Now you can ask “what was that restaurant you suggested?” and Siri can recall it from an earlier conversation.
It also reaches into more of your personal context: photos attached in Messages, Calendar event attendees, and Voicemails. Results from Safari history and your Reading List got better too.
One more small upgrade nobody talks about: you can now select and copy just part of a Siri response. Need one address or one phone number out of a long answer? Grab only that, not the whole block.
Requirements: iPhone 15 Pro, iPhone 15 Pro Max, or any iPhone 16 or later. It’s still unavailable in the EU and mainland China.
But a Siri that remembers more also sees more. That’s exactly why the next setting is the one you should open first
The Club of Rome is the EU
The Club of Rome was founded in the late 1960s by a core of disenchanted scientists, rich industrialists and bureaucrats.
They were the embryo of today's familiar climate activism aims, blaming unchecked population growth, industrial expansion and resource consumption for an impending collapse of civilisation within a century.
Their 1972 report, The Limits to Growth, popularised the concept of finite planetary boundaries and the perceived necessity of global growth management. This same core ideology drives the supranational climate agenda today.
In 1951, the UN incorporated the World Meteorological Organization, and in 1988 it created the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. These twin agencies became the chief architects of an ongoing environmental crisis narrative. Both operate with explicit political mandates: providing governments with curated scientific rationale to justify top-down climate mandates.
The underlying aim was always to frame human development - driven by energy use and population - as an existential threat. While IPCC assessment reports themselves were often selectively edited, UN leadership routinely amplified only the most radical, worst-case projections, distilling complex data into slogans of 'global boiling' or a 'code red for humanity'.
The result has been a feedback loop of escalating rhetoric, artificial urgency and public hysteria - language not supported even by the underlying technical documents. Meanwhile, dissent was quietly neutralised; scientific careers were bypassed, funding diverted and academic tenure denied to those who questioned this orthodoxy.
The core scientific claim relies on the premise that human emissions - roughly 3 to 4% of the total annual carbon flux - are overwhelming a naturally stable cycle. Yet Earth has experienced multiple sustained warm periods throughout the current Holocene interglacial; temperatures were 1 to 2°C warmer than today during the Holocene Climatic Optimum 8,000 to 5,000 years ago.
The previous warm interglacial period, the Eemian, was 2°C warmer than today; African megafauna lived in the Thames Valley. CO₂ played no part.
Furthermore, satellite observations confirm the planet has greened dramatically since the 1980s, expanding leaf-area index by an area equivalent to twice the continental United States - primarily driven by CO₂ fertilisation (NASA 2016, 2019; Zhu et al, Chen et al).
While adding atmospheric CO₂ produces warming, it does so on a diminishing logarithmic scale. The critical debate, therefore, has never been basic physics, but rather the magnitude of warming, the balance of real-world harms, and whether the mandated policy remedies are worse than the disease.
After four decades of warning and trillions of dollars in subsidies, wind and solar still supply only about 6% of global primary energy, while dense hydrocarbon fuels generate 82% (Statistical Review of World Energy 2024).
Western economies have been rushed into rapid, capital-intensive energy transitions for which grid infrastructure was never designed, driving systemic price spikes and manufacturing off-shoring. Strategic dominance over supply chains has shifted, with China now manufacturing over 90% of the world’s solar panels and wind turbines.
Meanwhile, annual COP summits have evolved into the world’s most extravagant traveling public relations circus - generating an estimated 100,000 tonnes of CO₂ at COP26 alone from fleets of private jets and five-star accommodations - to broker sweeping pledges that developing nations have little capacity or intention to fulfill.
That the climate debate touches on legitimate environmental questions is to be expected. But the overarching policy response has been shaped from its genesis by the same impulse that birthed the Club of Rome: restrict energy use, limit economic growth, and dilute national sovereignty.
They are eroding the Nation States, formed by the people for their people. The minions of the devil will stop at nothing until you own nothing and are happy about that… The foundations of Digital Slavery are being imbedded as we speak hence the worlds people trying to fight it.
Reevo retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 Calne, Wiltshire, England
Update from Police:- “A Body has been Found”
This is now the 3rd Body recovered in just over a Week in & around Wiltshire - which is typically a small quiet Countryside County
Seriously this is unheard of & getting out of control
Girls, Women & Parents - You seriously all need to be considering when, where & who with if you are walking about Town - the UK is sadly now already at this point
Reevo retweeted
Ultimately, the amount of harm that would totally outweigh the claimed benefit amounts to 6 minutes per person per year.
It is unmeasurable.
That is why it should not be in our food!
Reevo retweeted
Market update:
# Binance hack, $6bn stolen from biggest crypto exchange, while Bitcoin etc under pressure - looks like intervention by the stablecoin mafia
# Google (Alphabet) down 12% in a day, followed by a double-digit drop of Amazon - the tech bubble seems to be imploding, will get hairy if the AI bubble bursts. Still, I think measures will be taken to shore it up for the time being, as their total digital control grid is not yet ready.
# gold below $3,900: my personal view is it's a 'buy'. The next bout of inflation is around the corner.
Reevo retweeted
Denmark paid 71 million kroner for artillery shells for Ukraine.
Shells delivered: 0.
The "arms maker"? A registered software firm in Italy, sharing an address with an Audi dealer, advertising with video game and AI images.
Estonia had already prepaid the same firm 187M and got nothing. Then sent our 71M anyway.
No money has been recovered. We are a laughing stock 🤦♂️
Reevo retweeted
Newbies to the Polish political drama need to understand how language is being misused (by both sides) to further their respective crusades.
To the uninitiated, “restoring the rule of law” probably sounds like a noble objective. The framing makes it sound as though the previous government (despite being called the Law and Justice party) ruled without any regard for law and justice. Perhaps, even, that it abused its power by oppressing dissidents or confiscating assets. Who knows.
Tusk’s accusation of “lawlessness” is even more sensational and misleading. In ordinary language, the term conjures up images of a mafia state, or worse, a failed state where it’s every man for himself.
But no reasonable person assessing the period during which PiS was in power could honestly suggest that this was the case. Poland was not lawless in any ordinary understanding of the word.
The sleight of hand lies in taking a specific legal and constitutional dispute and repackaging it as a sweeping indictment of an entire government. The accusation derives its legitimacy from genuine controversies over the rule of law, but its political force comes from the much broader and more sinister meaning that the phrase carries in everyday language.
At the heart of the dispute is the question of whether Polish constitutional law can take precedence over EU law in areas where the EU maintains that its law has primacy, alongside controversies surrounding judicial independence. These are major legal questions, but they are a far cry from the impression of generalised lawlessness that Tusk’s rhetoric invites.
“Restoring the rule of law” is an exceptionally effective piece of political messaging. It allows Tusk to present his government as the force restoring legality, while casting his opponents as people who governed outside the law.
Yet, powerful states such as the US and China have long asserted their sovereignty against international legal constraints they consider unacceptable. The EU may be a distinct legal order whose treaties Poland voluntarily accepted, but the broader question of where national sovereignty ends and supranational authority begins is hardly unique to Poland.
Of course, the ultimate source of the consternation lies in PiS’ judicial reforms during its time in power. Yes, breaking established procedures to pack supposedly independent courts with your own appointees is not a good look. But it becomes a little more understandable when you consider the historical context that Western media so often leave out when reporting on the story.
Poland never underwent a comprehensive “lustration” of its judiciary after the fall of communism. The transition involved compromises that allowed considerable institutional continuity, with elements of the old judicial establishment, its professional networks and institutional culture surviving into the new democratic order.
This is crucial because PiS did not regard itself as politicising an otherwise independent judiciary. Its contention was precisely the opposite: that the judiciary was already politicised, having never been sufficiently disentangled from the structures and networks inherited from the communist era.
From that perspective, its reforms were intended to dismantle an entrenched establishment rather than create one. The opposition and the EU regarded those same interventions as an assault on judicial independence.
Tusk and his allies have often challenged the relevance of the judiciary’s communist-era legacy by pointing out that most judges from that period are no longer serving. But this misses the substance of the argument. The concern is not necessarily about the survival of individual communist-era judges, but about the professional networks, institutional culture and entrenched structures that may have outlived them. The continuum.
Reevo retweeted
PM heading off to the Caribbean shortly, just after a heavily-criticised Budget, with no political reporters allowed. Not the case in the past.
The King will be going with the entire royal press pack and will therefore get more scrutiny than the actual Prime Minister.
EXC: Burnham Breaks With Convention by Refusing to Let Journalists Attend Commonwealth Summit order-order.com/2026/10/13/e…
Reevo retweeted
The Home Office are compiling lists of posts that criticise Prevent, including mine.
Rather than run a counter-terror programme fit for purpose to catch Jihadists before they butcher innocents, civil servants spend their time gathering names of people pointing out the problem.
This is why the government are so desperate to censor X, YouTube, and any other platform where their opponents can call public attention to their misconduct.
Glad to know I've got them worried.
NOW — The Home Office has released the list of social media posts its Standards and Compliance Unit observed about Prevent in 2024.
The department disclosed:
• A post of mine criticising a local-council training module that directed staff to report anyone sharing “anti-immigration views” to counter-terrorism police.
• A post from @Con_Tomlinson criticising the Home Office’s RICU unit and the fact Prevent designated Douglas Murray a far-right extremist.
Dozens of other public posts and articles are listed raising the same position, “Prevent training focuses heavily on the far-right while downplaying Islamist extremism.”
This unit, known as “StaCU” - is collecting and logging criticism of Prevent’s training bias.
The original request for this material was refused under national-security and health-and-safety exemptions.
Disclosure only happened after the applicant went to the ICO.
Reevo retweeted
So, basically, 500 million Europeans expect 300 million Americans to protect them from 120 million Russians who can’t even defeat 40 million Ukrainians while those 500 million Europeans don’t even realize they are being conquered by 2 billion Muslims who claim they are being persecuted by 8 million Israelis. Is that about right?
1
The devils little minions are failing we must thank god for that.
Shame on all our politicians that apologise for Britains role in slavery, we’ve only just stopped paying the bill in 2015. Meanwhile as all the worlds leaders legislate to force their citizens to register into the Digital Slave grid to role out the cage of control for the 1%..
Reevo retweeted
Urgent help. A friends son is missng
This is extremely out of character. Large-scale police search is underway.
Any farmers in my network between Ashby and Hartshorne please check your land and any remote outbuildings, he may be injured
Please share this tweet by any means posible.
thefarmingforum.co.uk/index.…
All these ministers banging on about redoing the EU as it fails and falls into a bubbling den of iniquity should be removed from positions, where’s the risk assessment? Resignations, coups, corruption is rife. It’s as far away from democracy as North Korea.
Reevo retweeted
NOW — The Home Office has released the list of social media posts its Standards and Compliance Unit observed about Prevent in 2024.
The department disclosed:
• A post of mine criticising a local-council training module that directed staff to report anyone sharing “anti-immigration views” to counter-terrorism police.
• A post from @Con_Tomlinson criticising the Home Office’s RICU unit and the fact Prevent designated Douglas Murray a far-right extremist.
Dozens of other public posts and articles are listed raising the same position, “Prevent training focuses heavily on the far-right while downplaying Islamist extremism.”
This unit, known as “StaCU” - is collecting and logging criticism of Prevent’s training bias.
The original request for this material was refused under national-security and health-and-safety exemptions.
Disclosure only happened after the applicant went to the ICO.
Reevo retweeted
He wasnt wrong
Nearly two years ago I settled accounts with Donald Tusk unsparingly. With his actions today he has confirmed every warning I issued:
“Mr Tusk, politicians like you are the greatest threat to European nations. While you were in opposition you attacked your own country’s sovereignty with the help of the EU.
Now that you are back in power you are destroying the rule of law in Poland. Opposition figures are being hunted down and politically inconvenient court rulings are being overturned. Your media coup was illegal, and now you are threatening even more censorship on the internet. This increasingly resembles a regime.
In a single year you have committed more breaches of the rule of law than PiS dared to attempt in eight years. The EU lets you get away with all of it, because you were always Brussels’ most obedient servant.
And now you threaten to extend your work of destruction to the whole of Europe – mass migration, censorship, geopolitical escalation, wokeness, the Green Deal.
You are one of the chief architects of all of this, even if you now pretend to know nothing about it.
You are a Polish Angela Merkel. You are a Polish Ursula von der Leyen. And the worst part is that you are proud of it. That is bad for your country, Poland, and it is bad for our continent, Europe.”
Why do we put up with any of them. None are of the standard we need for peace and prosperity.
The Tory party should never be allowed near UK energy policy again:
Under the Tories, £100 in policy costs were loaded on to energy bills and for a medium-sized business, we went from average electricity prices in 2010 to the most expensive in Europe.
thetimes.com/uk/politics/art…
