Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe) header
Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe) profile picture

Law Professor

Cambridge, MA
Joined May 2014
Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)Photo by Richard M. Re (@RichardMRe)
Final version: The Standing Realignment | The Supreme Court Review: Vol 2025, By Paz and Re journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10…
2
35
3,923
Richard M. Re retweeted
My piece on "General Law Revivalism and the Problem of 1938," written with my great three-decade co-author, @curtisabradley, is out. yalelawjournal.org/pdf/136-1…
5
1
30
2,800
Richard M. Re retweeted
So glad to see this outstanding piece from @emilysbremer in @YaleLJournal out in print. She's been kicking it around next door to me for some time in the law school! yalelawjournal.org/article/v…
1
16
1
59
6,406
Richard M. Re retweeted
Here’s my new article with Jack Goldsmith, “General Law Revivalism and the Problem of 1938.” yalelawjournal.org/pdf/136-1…
4
12
1,399
Richard M. Re retweeted
My new article with Jack Goldsmith, “General Law Revivalism and the Problem of 1938,” is now out in the Yale Law Journal. (Link provided in the comment below.) We argue that recent academic efforts to revive the pre-Erie “general law” overlook how dysfunctional the general law regime had become before Erie and fail to appreciate the extent to which that regime is incompatible with the post-Erie constitutional order. We also explain how Erie and its progeny created what we term the “Erie algorithm,” which requires federal courts to convert pre-Erie rules premised on one understanding of law and federal judicial power into rules premised on different understandings of both, almost always with a different meaning and legal status than prevailed at the Founding and in the nineteenth century. As we document, this algorithm undergirds nearly every aspect of contemporary federal courts doctrine. @jacklgoldsmith, @YaleLJournal
2
16
1
88
15,127
Richard M. Re retweeted
Pleased to say that this essay is now forthcoming in the Green Bag (@GB2d), joining "How to Read a Legal Opinion," "A Theory of Law," and ""The Influence of Immanuel Kant on Evidentiary Approaches in Eighteenth Century Bulgaria."
I have just posted a revised version of my recent essay, "How to Excel on Law School Essay Exams: A Guide for Students." Thanks to readers for comments on the first version; more comments are still very welcome. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
3
9
92
9,669
Richard M. Re retweeted
My new article, Artificial Intelligence and Near-Total Law Enforcement, is up on SSRN: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
1
8
1
20
1,572
Richard M. Re retweeted
Jud Campbell's scholarship is terrific, and I enjoyed his new Scalia lecture at HLS: "The Federalist Bill of Rights," arguing there was a divide b/w the Federalists & Anti-Federalists about what a Bill of Rights should be, & the Federalist view won out. youtube.com/watch?v=UIcFp-i_…
4
10
4
92
21,744
Richard M. Re retweeted
New paper up on SSRN - Interbranch Litigation - Comments welcome! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
1
6
1
23
1,888
Richard M. Re retweeted
Carl Schmitt and Moral Time Travel, with applause to @StephenESachs (This was both interesting and painful to write.) casssunstein.substack.com/p/…
2
8
1
39
7,500