Science and Technology Policy Fellow @AAAS_STPF in Research security and technology ethics | Moral psychology | China studies
Arlington, VA
Joined September 2020
- Tweets364
- Following731
- Followers326
- Likes1.1K
Pinned Tweet
Check out our new article, by @mtwjmsdns and m! We discuss digital wellbeing with insights from and methods associated with empirical moral and cultural psychology. Thanks to @charles_ess for helpful discussions! doi.org/10.1007/s44206-022-0… #intercultural #digitalwellbeing
Final reminder: Please watch and share my talk about cross-cultural AI ethics before April 21!
I will win $1000 in personal development funds if I get the most views.
youtube.com/shorts/MbY8jYyuV…
Please watch and share - whoever gets the most views wins $1000. Thanks!
Dr. Rockwell F. Clancy: “AI is culturally ignorant — That's a problem!" youtube.com/shorts/MbY8jYyuV… via @YouTube
New article by Qin Zhu, Subho Majumdar, PhD, and me!
AI ethics is broken - Most initiatives rely on Western-centric values and unrealistic assumptions about how people think and act.
Open-access article here: link.springer.com/article/10…
-Ethics grounded in how people actually make decisions -Frameworks that respect cultural diversity instead of imposing one-size-fits-all principles
-Insights from moral psychology and the social sciences to connect ideals with human behavior
If AI is truly global, then AI ethics must be too.
-What would it take to build AI ethics that everyone can recognize themselves in?
#AI #AIethics #GlobalAI #ResponsibleAI #MoralPsychology #CrossCultural #Ethics
Check out Yuqi Peng's review of China, Engineering, and Ethics: A Sketch of the Landscape, edited by Qin Zhu, Denver Tang, and me.
pdcnet.org/techne/content/te…
“Towards a culturally responsive approach to global AI ethics” by Qin Zhu, Subho Majumdar, and me.
Background: Approaches to AI ethics are culturally biased, since they are grounded in values, principles, and frameworks that fail to represent the diversity of global populations.
Check out this new chapter by Xin Luo, Chunping Fan, and Fumihiko Tochinai and me – open access, please share widely!
“Two Criticisms of Engineering Ethics Assessment: The Importance of Behaviors and Culture”
What’s wrong with approaches to technology ethics assessment?
➤ Response
👉 Assessment measures must incorporate insights and methods from the behavioral and social sciences, moral and cultural psychology, anthropology and sociology.
👉 We describe how this could be done.
➤ What do you think?
Comments welcome!
For those in the area, tomorrow (November 1, 2024) I’ll speak at two events at @JMU in Harrisonburg, VA.
A roundtable hosted by computer science at 11:30 am and a talk hosted by philosophy at 4pm.
AI ethics can only become global by becoming culturally responsive, but it can only become culturally responsive by becoming psychologically realist. Global AI policies and initiatives cannot be based on reflection alone.
They must be based on how people actually think about and behave with regard to AI and ethics.
#global #ai #ethics #aiethics #culture #psychology #moral #philosophy #responsible #responsibleai
