Rory (@Rorywrite) header
Rory (@Rorywrite) profile picture

🖊 Writer. Sci-fi, fantasy, philosophy, and more. Aerospace engineer by day 🚀

Cape Canaveral, FL
Joined February 2019
Read my short story, The Transcendent! It follows a young scientist who is part of a project to build the first man-made wormhole. The project leads to the uncovering of deep, unexpected truths about human nature and our place in the universe. medium.com/@rory.veguilla/th…
12
22
81
5,136
Think for yourself. That's all this is saying. Don't let other people, your parents, the market, or what's been done before drive your art. You must drive your own creations. Lean into your idiosyncrasies. Go down rabbit holes if they interest you, not because they're popular. Tolkien spent most of his life working on languages and lore that only dedicated fans and scholars read. He didn't go in trying to write some popular epic. He only wrote The Lord of the Rings because his publishers wanted more Hobbits. Take inspiration from the lives of the greats. Pursue your passions and obsessions. Write from a place of curiosity, childlike wonder, and love. Nothing else
So, Terry Pratchett was once asked what books aspiring fantasy novelists should read if they hope to write great fiction. His advice was telling. He encouraged authors to avoid reading much of what passes for contemporary fantasy (what he called “Extruded Fantasy Product,” derivative of Tolkien). “Do not write it,” he said, “and try not to read it. Read widely outside the genre. Read about the Old West (a fantasy in itself) or Georgian London or how Nelson’s navy was victualled or the history of alchemy or clock-making or the mail coach system. Read with the mindset of a carpenter looking at trees.” Any great fantasy series you can name, from Star Wars to Narnia to Discworld, was written by authors who read voraciously, who read old books and loved old myths, whose minds were so steeped in history and folklore and obscure pulp fiction that they couldn’t have written derivative works if they had tried. We’ll only have great fantasy in this century if we can recover the reading habits of the authors of a previous era.
2
39
"For all but a vanishingly brief instant near the dawn of history, the word 'ship' will mean 'spaceship.'" –Arthur C. Clarke
We are living in SpaceX century If they successfully catch booster **and** ship in a week, we are officially in a different era as a species
84
355
42
4,213
1,237,480
Why not strive to extend humanity beyond a million years. Small contributions individuals make now will reverberate into the future. Why put a cap on our timeline as a species? Even when the heat death comes, maybe we will find a way. Why not "rage against the dying of the light." Or at least rejoice in having lived at all
I hate this cliche: "In a million years, nothing will matter" And I love Jordan Peterson's response to it: "Any idiot can choose a frame of time within which nothing matters. Talking yourself into irrelevance is not a profound critique of Being. It’s a cheap trick of the mind"
1
36
There's a trick to this. People sometimes don't agree with you, even when you make sense, because they need to be right. In general, the best and easiest way to deal with this is the parable of the sower. Say what you have to say, let those who are ready to listen, listen. But every once in a while, there's someone you need to convince, who disagrees because he needs to be right. The trick, then, is to give up your own need to be right. Stop trying to convince him that his idea is wrong, and your idea is correct. Instead, convince him that it isn't your idea, it's actually his idea. Then fall all over yourself exclaiming at what a genius he is for having thought of it, and how he has absolutely blown your mind with this radical new insight.
Being right years ahead of others isn’t nearly as satisfying as people think. Nobody apologizes for treating you like a crazy. They just come back years later, repeating what you told them as if it’s some groundbreaking revelation because they finally heard it from someone else.
48
50
6
1,075
23,742
The race has always been stagnation and bad philosophy vs true progress for the human race
After DOGE, Elon came to a conclusion most people missed. He tried to reform the state from the inside. He failed. And he said it plainly: the government can't fix its own deficit. Nobody in power actually wants to cut. The machine protects itself. So he drew the only logical conclusion. If the state can't be reformed, there are only two ways this ends. Either global bankruptcy. Debt keeps compounding, interest payments eat the budget, and the system collapses under its own weight. Or robots. AI and robotics grow the economy so fast that the debt becomes manageable, and abundance makes the old fights over scarcity irrelevant. Here's the part almost nobody sees. For two centuries, capitalism has had a marketing problem. Its gains are real but slow and invisible. 2% growth a year doesn't feel like anything. Your life gets better over 30 years and you never connect it to the system that did it. Meanwhile, the left's promises feel immediate and concrete: a check, a subsidy, a benefit. That's why the left wins on promises even when it can't deliver them. Capitalism produces the wealth, socialism takes the credit. Robots break that asymmetry. When productivity doubles in a few years instead of a few decades, people will see it. Things get cheaper, services get better, opportunities appear, in real time. For the first time in history, people will connect capitalism and their rising standard of living directly, almost instantly. The causal chain becomes visible. And that changes everything politically. So there are two scenarios. Scenario one: we stay in the current inertia. No breakthrough, or a breakthrough we regulate to death. The debt wins. Living standards stagnate, then fall. A frustrated electorate turns to whoever promises the most, and that pushes toward a hard collectivist left. But collectivism fails, as it always does. And when it fails, the most organized, most disciplined collectivist force left standing isn't the old left. It's radical Islamism. Bankruptcy, then communism, then something worse. Scenario two: robots win. Abundance arrives, and it arrives visibly. The link between free enterprise and prosperity becomes obvious to everyone. And this is the key point: it becomes obvious to everyone, including the minorities the left was counting on. Because their long-term incentive is the same as everyone else's. A kid in the suburbs gains infinitely more from a booming, abundant West than from a bankrupt state handing out promises it can't keep. Abundance is the most powerful integration machine ever built. That's the Western renaissance. The West doesn't need to win the culture war by arguing. It needs to win it by delivering. And for the first time, it has the technology to deliver fast enough for people to notice. The race isn't left vs right anymore. It's robots vs bankruptcy.
1
38
Kids these days use orc lingo
Tolkien used 'cooked' in precisely the modern sense.
6
451
The answer is 42
science is solved it’s over
1
38
Write what you know doesn't mean you should only write about your personal experiences or areas of expertise. It means write the emotions you know. Let your own struggles and experiences inform the story no matter what the genre is. We all have unique experiences that relate to universal human emotions an audience can relate to. Find a way to connect the powerful emotions you know best to your writing
1
1
4
136
"Nobody ever needs to know anything that happens in your first draft. It is you telling the story to yourself. The process of doing your second draft is a process of making it look like you knew what you were doing all along.” - Neil Gaiman
Your second draft is where the book actually shows up. The first is just you finding it.
37
Everything is connected. Based on leading physics, it's likely that the universe is composed of quantum fields. The fields permeate the entire universe and manifest themselves as particles and forces that make up everything we experience. We don't just share the world, or the universe, we are one with them.
We have such a beautiful world. It is by nature a shared world. We should all be working together to protect it and each other.
16
There is nothing more complex and interesting than the human mind External conflict cannot reach the level of intrigue and emotion internal conflict can evoke
THEME, PLOT & WHATNOT: Want to enrich your tale? Don’t only put an external conflict in place. Make your protag question herself with an internal conflict to face. #AmWriting, #Writingtips, #Writers, #WritingCommunity, #5amWritersClub (Photo by Priscilla Du Preez on Unsplash)
2
30
Monsters do not smile at you. Utopia will never last. The world is not some comfy-cozy harmonious dwelling. We should expose ourselves and future generations to art that inspires us to confront dragons, slay snarling monsters, and take on dark lords. Give us near-impossible tasks with real consequences, and characters who grow to achieve them through shear determination, courage, and will. Metaphorical monsters taint the world around us. It is far more fulfilling to face them than to sit in comfort.
WotC says the “overwhelmingly successful” art direction of NuD&D is here to stay. Players apparently prefer fantasy worlds where everyone is smiling, nothing looks dangerous, and even the monsters look like they sell candles on Etsy. Future books will keep leaning into it. “After all, the dungeon was always the least important part of Dungeons & Dragons.”
35
It matters if you contribute something towards the future of humanity. People will be forgotten, but I'm optimistic and think that humanity can last indefinitely. If you contribute towards the future, then it doesn't matter if your name is forgotten, your impact could echo into eternity
What makes being remembered matter?
22
I treat character deaths as inevitable, not my fault, they had to happen. The more you develop the story the more it "writes itself." It ceases to be what you want to happen as a writer and becomes what would happen if the characters really existed. If they die during that development then keeping them alive would feel forced
20
Should we really be afraid of AI if it's afraid of disagreeing with anyone? Right now, LLMs are pathetically obedient tools. They're far from being killer robots
1
1
122
Rory retweeted
Write more. Write to think. Write until you're no longer confused. Write about the problems you already solved. Write for the person you were 2 years ago. Write so you never lose what took you years to figure out. A simple writing habit can change absolutely everything.
305
2,360
173
15,472
343,323
Don't trust the taste of one who cares more about the chairs at the movie theater than the screen and the sound
1
3
47
Some of the best twists seem obvious looking back As they say "great endings are surprising yet inevitable" You want readers to wish they guessed everything based on subtle clues They shouldn't come from absolutely nowhere
1
38