Pinned Tweet
Ya listo "Estatrix", disponible la segunda versiΓ³n completamente diferente a la anterior, mΓ‘s filosΓ³fica y aceleracionista.
Si les interesa manden mensaje y darles el PDF. Me gustarΓa su opiniΓ³n, graciasπ΄
βππ₯π±π·π»β retweeted
Half my TL is typically "If you don't hate intelligence with a white-hot passion you're fucking retarded!"
βππ₯π±π·π»β retweeted
you must overcome ai-induced ego death:
the sooner you accept that the models are smarter than you, the sooner youβll see your true value was never just your intelligence
and you'll be so much happier
Ahora que subΓ el vΓdeo, harΓ© un disclaimer, ya que el tema no es prescriptivo ni busca darle buena o mala imagen.
Simplemente creo que el vΓdeo debe verse sin ningΓΊn tipo de prejuicio...
youtu.be/gr2633Cp3dI?si=OUDkβ¦
βππ₯π±π·π»β retweeted
Replying to @SERGIOSAND____
Buen video :D
EstΓ‘ bueno el formato, se puede pulir mucho mΓ‘s eso sΓ :D
Un abrazo, sigue asΓ crack :D
El Capitalismo Es Horror Cosmico...
Ya listo mi primero vΓdeo de YouTube sobre el tema del capitalismo como fuerza Β«alienigenaΒ», dΓganme que opinan y suscribanse al canal π΄...
youtu.be/gr2633Cp3dI?si=OUDkβ¦
π€ Made with AI
βππ₯π±π·π»β retweeted
Replying to @QuetzalPhoenix
China isn't quite, but almost, more capitalist than the USA.
Que bueno serΓa vivir en un mundo donde todos los comunistas aceptarΓ‘n su triste realidad.
Me parece obligatorio hacer un Substack al respecto...
Alguien de verdad cree que el dinero desaparecerΓ‘ por una probable prueba de P=NP en el futuro?
If AI proves that P = NP and we get algorithms that actually run in reasonable time. The whole structure of the economy would shift because so many of the coordination problems that currently require markets, prices and intermediate institutions would become direct computations instead.
One of the clearest places this shows up is in the basic question of whether any group of parties should exchange goods or services at all. Today that decision requires searching through an enormous space of possible reallocations.
For even a modest number of people and discrete items the number of ways bundles can move, coalitions can form and transfers can clear grows so fast that exhaustive search is impossible.
Checking a single candidate deal is easy once the valuations are written down but finding one that is mutually improving or stable is the hard part. Currency has always been a practical workaround for that hardness: a shared measuring stick that lets people price things locally and discover deals without anyone solving the full combinatorial problem.
With an efficient method for the search the parties can simply state their valuations, current holdings and constraints and receive a clearing allocation or the minimal transfers that make the exchange work.
The evaluation of whether the goods or services should move is then the output of the computation rather than something that depends on everyone already holding enough of a previously agreed unit.
Misreporting what you want and the usual problems of private information remain but the need for a circulating medium whose primary job is to make the existence of a multi-party reallocation discoverable in the first place largely disappears. Exchange then coordinates around the ability to solve the allocation problem directly.
La IA es en realidad la mΓ‘xima expresiΓ³n de la inocencia
AI could give humanity its childhood back.
Remember being a kid?
You didnβt wake up thinking about productivity.
You wanted to explore.
Build things.
Play games.
Learn about the world.
Create something just because it was fun.
Then you grew up, and suddenly everything became about making money to survive.
Imagine a future where that pressure disappears.
Where curiosity becomes the default state of human existence again.
Where people create because they want to, not because they have to.
Thatβs the future I want AI to build.
El capitalismo entendido como el proceso espontΓ‘neo de destrucciΓ³n creativa es el ΓΊnico mecanismo capaz de funcionar sin un sistema central.
Todo lo demΓ‘s es basura ideolΓ³gica.
βππ₯π±π·π»β retweeted
Nick Land: βAcelerar mΓ‘s allΓ‘ de la velocidad de la luz es invertir la direcciΓ³n del tiempo. Finalmente, en la ciencia-ficciΓ³n, la modernidad completa su proceso de revisionismo teolΓ³gico mediante el redescubrimiento de la culminaciΓ³n escatolΓ³gica en un loop del tiempo. Juicio final. El fin llega cuando el futuro retrocede para atraparnosβ.
Esta nueva tendencia extraΓ±a del foro de mezclas mutualistas y agoristas son un dolor de cabeza. Una moda que no aΓ±ade nada, solo sostenida por moda e impopularidad del capitalismo.
El futuro se tratara de crisis y colapsos mentales ante la inevitabilidad del nihilismo epistemolΓ³gico humano.
La Singularidad tecnolΓ³gica es solo la conclusiΓ³n de ese proceso.























