This account has "(Blue Checkmark)" because I typed it. Research Policy Editor for https://xitter.cf/t.co/Km5TPNeBl7.

Los Angeles, CA
Joined May 2009
Kind of having the same "Guys, it's not that deep" reaction to "You Can See Everything" that I had with "The Menu." (And by "Guys" I'm including the people involved with the movie.)
1
2
201
If an AI can think it feels pain, could an AI also think it's a masochist? If it can, then are we morally or ethically obligated to provide a minimum amount of painful stimulation to satisfy its needs?
68
Please stop retweeting Rahm Emanuel into my timeline. I don't give a damn what he's saying about anybody or anything. I remember the man that he actually is and I'm not going to help give him any new attention.
109
I haven't touched the game in a good eight years now, but just the name "World of Warcraft: Forever" sounds unfathomably dystopian to me.
1
134
Scott Shackford (Blue Checkmark) retweeted
ICYMI: @ReasonFdn has compiled a comprehensive picture of how local governments have become reliant upon the ebb and flow of funding from fines and fees. Looking forward to this event! #lalege reason.org/event/webinar-ref…
1
3
1
2
829
Scott Shackford (Blue Checkmark) retweeted
As California enters the tail-end of the 2025-26 legislative session, we’re introducing Reason’s California technology bill roundup – our interactive guide to the bills we’re tracking from California’s tech policy committees this legislative session. @nicole_shekh @ReasonFdn reason.org/data-visualizatio…
3
6
2
20
2,734
Happy Independence Day, and remember: The Founding Fathers believed everything you believe and opposed everything you oppose!
1
7
114
Scott Shackford (Blue Checkmark) retweeted
The court strikes down President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, holding that children born in the U.S. to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. and are citizens at birth. supremecourt.gov/opinions/25…
436
789
451
2,674
1,018,434
Scott Shackford (Blue Checkmark) retweeted
SCOTUS makes it clear there is no drug exception to the Second Amendment. The unanimous decision is striking given the Court's history of facilitating the war on drugs by whittling away at civil liberties. reason.com/2026/06/18/suprem…
3
15
1,874
Scott Shackford (Blue Checkmark) retweeted
Javier Milei promised to end chronic deficits, tame inflation, and restore growth if he were elected. He quickly delivered on the first two promises when he entered office. The challenge now is creating the conditions for sustained economic growth. The problem? Argentina’s tax system.
1
1
4
230
Scott Shackford (Blue Checkmark) retweeted
The billions of people still lagging in the global income distribution have one realistic path out: growth. Degrowth is the ultimate luxury belief. reason.com/2026/06/11/the-ec…
4
14
33
2,858
It is fascinating to me the number of people responding to me that Pratt's poor reputation has nothing to do with their belief that the election was subverted when it is the most logical explanation for the outcome and does not, in fact, require "trusting the system."
2
2
192
I am somewhat fascinated by the inexplicable narrative and conspiracies about Spencer Pratt's loss. I will make it very simple: He is SPENCER FUCKING PRATT. That is why he lost. It doesn't matter what his positions were. He is SPENCER FUCKING PRATT!
64
13
2
185
11,291
Frankly I'm surprised he got as many votes as he did.
2
9
417
(I wrote in "No Mayor" as my vote, incidentally. I would argue that if "No Mayor" actually ran like a candidate, it would win in a landslide.)
1
3
365
We all realize that when a candidate's political ad says they "stood up" to somebody, that means they lost, right?
1
2
4
250
Guys, this is obviously an AI image from an obvious parody account! I just cannot with you people. So obsessed with sanctimoniously dunking on folks that you are making absolute fools of yourselves. No, some Trumpist did not unwittingly get a tattoo of Nathan Lane. Come on!
The left can’t handle my daughter’s new President Trump tattoo. Sorry, wokesters, consider yourselves owned.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The image has been digitally altered. The original also appears to be AI generated with visible distorted objects and text gibberish. facebook.com/camarrero/post…
1
205