Nurse. All views are, of course, my own. Coffee fiend and cranky - in no particular order. ☕️🗿🫡

Joined May 2009
Pinned Tweet
Seeing a lot of these comments flying around and so I thought I’d share this. I’m not the best at explaining but hopefully makes sense and happy to answer questions.
Replying to @WaitingForPerot
I’m gonna try and answer lol. So as you know, AE’s = adverse events that happen after study intervention. AESI’s = adverse events of special interest, this is usually (in my world) something sponsor specifically wants you to look out for… 1/
2
3
14
3,392
Great thread as always by @IntegralAnswers Dr Peter Hotez will always be a particular hero of mine in the science field. His dedication to finding vaccines/treatments for neglected illnesses for those in poverty will always humble me. 👏🏼 🫶🏼
Most people know Dr. Peter Hotez from his television appearances during COVID, his defense of vaccination, and the relentless attacks directed at him on social media. I know Peter as a friend. And I want to tell you about another part of his life that rarely enters those arguments. For more than four decades, Peter has devoted much of his scientific career to diseases that afflict some of the poorest people on Earth. Diseases that cause enormous suffering but attract relatively little commercial investment because the people who need treatment often cannot afford to pay for it. Hookworm. Schistosomiasis. Chagas disease. Leishmaniasis. These are hardly household names. Their victims rarely make headlines, and the scientists working on them seldom become celebrities. Peter chose this field long before COVID, long before the cable news appearances, and long before strangers began calling him a pharmaceutical industry shill. His career deserves a closer look. Because the work tells a story that is almost entirely absent from the accusations made against him.
1
3
19
2,350
🤣🤣 Amazing.
4
159
There are truly dim witted people on this app who think that books written by unqualified people with an opinion and are unverified/not independently reviewed, are actual evidence. Hilarious. 🤣 This has made my day. Off to walk the dogs and enjoy my coffee.
🙄 have you read RFK Jr’s The Real Anthony Fauci. 1st Chspter he explains how the industry has found a way to pay the regulators. It’s amazing this has happened. FDA, NIH get royalties on Pharma. Wild.
4
6
47
630
New systematic review and meta analysis in JAMA=19 studies/15.9 million participants. ADHD was associated with ⬆️ mortality across multiple causes, while ADHD med use was associated with a 25% lower all cause mortality...
2
11
1
24
1,676
Well, well, well indeed. An observational study presented as proof of causation, conveniently ignoring findings of reduced schizophrenia and bipolar diagnoses in vaccinated. Even better, the journal issued an editorial notice in July 2026 over concerns about the study. Awkward.🫢
7
9
52
907
Also, large UK cohort study published in JAMA Psych found that ⬆️ in psych diagnoses following COVID infection were generally ⬇️ in vaccinated individuals. It examines a different question and doesn’t est causation, but it defo challenges the narrative being promoted here.
10
72
Demands evidence. Shows an unsourced meme as own evidence. But even the brain dead understand it apparently. 🥴 Venn diagram complete after checking out their timeline, of course. 🫣🤣 These people are deeply unserious. 🙄
unavailable
2
3
90
My man is here posting VAERs as evidence. Its 2026 mate, this shit was debunked years ago. Tantrum activated. 🤣
17
You’ve now publicly stated that you would personally volunteer to execute your own nursing colleagues. That’s not advocacy for ICF or pt safety. Deeply disturbing, particularly from someone entrusted with patient care, although I strongly suspect you are not a health care prof.🤮
Not only that but if it ever happened I would volunteer to be on the firing squad of my coworkers that gave it and murdered those that we SERVE!
4
5
30
679
Blocked. Disgusting creatures.
2
18
Geoff would like everyone to know that he agrees with Lovely Linda regarding killing health care workers. What a delightful bunch these people are. Society has hit rock bottom.
Following orders was Never an Excuse- Nuremberg . "licensed" never meant SAFE
3
2
17
398
xitter.cf/sammmmbb_/status/21126… 🤣🤣🤦🏻‍♀️🫣
Again, stupidest man on X. Keep going. This is hilarious.
12
xitter.cf/geoff58g/status/211266… Definitely not talking about execution. Nooooo. Absolute spoon. 🤣
the Term "Nuremburg" does not infere Executions , it refers to a Militiary trial for Crimes against Humanity , have NO Doubt that such trials will be held in the Future ---at the Hague or elsewhere --- the idea of "do no harm" was nullified during the Covid Scamdemic ---many Good Doctors called out the "Protocols" as Deadly ---the Health System persisted ----the cosequences WILL be severe but i doubt the Death Penalty will be invoked in most countries ---- the Guilt is palpable judging from the reponses
33
This! 👏🏼
You keep saying medicine broke trust while repeating the very misinformation that helped break it. Vaccines were called poison. Ventilators were blamed for the deaths of patients already in respiratory failure. Remdesivir was called murder. Physicians were accused of falsifying death certificates. Those claims were amplified for years by people who had never managed ARDS, never worked an ICU, never certified a death, and often did not understand the evidence they were attacking. Did medicine make mistakes? Certainly. Bad communication, bad policy, institutional arrogance — all fair game. But you do not get to help poison public trust and then point at physicians and say, “Look what you did.” If you want trust repaired, stop feeding the lies that damaged it.
1
11
237
Always the “Christians”. 🤮
1
10
84
Deleted his comment so here it is. 😊
1
44
Unacceptable, unforgivable, ghoulish, repulsive behaviour and absolutely should be instantly dismissed and marched off the premises. No excuse whatsoever given the media exposure and NHS campaign surrounding this issue. Breaching confidentiality is inexcusable.
9
7
57
1,862