Sarahcl retweeted
Schrodingers lazy slob behaviour: simultaneously so trivial and easy that it's stupid of women not to pick up after their husbands but also so hard that the husbands can't possibly be expected to do it in the first place.
Sarahcl retweeted
I know being anti-pornography is a low status opinion, sneered at by everyone from podcast bros to ‘down girls’. But as with transgenderism, also wrongly dismissed as a personal matter, the harms are obvious (though only you consider women & children human, & civilisation worth protecting)
Sarahcl retweeted
Replying to @SarahCeEl @BenGunnEx
If access to pornography reduced sexual violence, the advent of the internet should have reduced sexual violence to zero.
I should have been clearer with my caption, this quote about Berl Kutchinski is from the book Transforming a Rape Culture, edited by Emilie Buchwald, Pamela R. Fletcher, and Martha Roth.
1
59
Robert Rutledge (@rerutled) has blocked me for challenging him about how risk and MVAWG works. Why are there so many men in academia who are so sure of their arguments that they block anyone who challenges them?
19
Sarahcl retweeted
Replying to @latsot
I do strangulation exams as part of my job. I have taken extensive training in strangulation and am qualified to testify as an expert in strangulation cases. The general public has no idea how bad this epidemic has become, how many women and girls this is happening to, or how dangerous this is.
I share facts about it sometimes like men who strangle women are twice as likely to be involved in a mass shooting or to kill a cop. Women who are strangled by their partners are 750% more likely to be killed by that partner.
I tell people that death by strangulation can occur in just minutes, under a minute if you hit the right nerve bundles that lead to certain arrhythmias. I also tell them that a woman can die from a strangulation event up to one year after the event and that a pregnant woman who has been strangled is at high risk of pregnancy loss for weeks after the strangulation event. Strangulation can lead to brain damage, physical disability, stroke, pregnancy loss, and death.
I tell people that there is no safe way to strangle and that nobody has the ability to consent to being murdered, and consent is not an excuse for murder, if someone were to consent to this it is incumbent on the would be murderer to use self discipline and restraint, because a person’s “consent” to being murdered is not going to be recognized by any court as a legitimate excuse. Nobody can consent to being killed.
When I tell people these things, a very few are appreciative, mostly women, some are interested, men and women, and some attack me for being stupid and not knowing what I am talking about, apparently days of professional training and hundreds of exams performed mean nothing to the “experts” of X. Those that attack are mostly men. Some argue with me about dumb things, like my insistence to call strangulation what it is. Strangulation is not choking, choking is not strangulation, these are two different types of ways to block an airway but they are not the same. That is what people argue with me about the most. They insist on using incorrect language and then provide me with a weak google link picture of a choke hold to try to prove it’s the same.
So then it becomes me explaining that a choke hold is called a chokehold but it is not choking it is strangulation and that blows their minds and I am met with silence or swears.
This is an incredibly important issue that needs to be discussed but it is very contentious and the defenders of strangulation can turn into rabid dogs very quickly.
Anyway, I just wanted to tell you that I really appreciate the effort you are taking here, that you are raising awareness and that you are using accurate language and data. It’s really important that we change the narrative around this subject.
I would like to share this resource with you, I’m not sure if you are aware of them or not, but this was the group that did my training on strangulation. They go all over the US teaching medical professionals and law enforcement about strangulation and they have a ton of information and resources on their website. You might find them useful.
Thank you for talking about this.
strangulationtraininginstitu…
Sarahcl retweeted
Isis beheading videos, animal torture, live streamed self-harm… why is it only ever porn that free speech warriors bravely come out fighting for? 🧐
Sarahcl retweeted
So, a boy has been spared prison for stabbing a girl repeatedly because he is a bright lad. Recently, some boys were spared prison for raping girls because they were not bright lads. Open season, then.
Sarahcl retweeted
"The Nordic model... positions sex work not as "consensual labor," but as a result of structural inequality and exploitation. Official evaluations in Sweden (such as the 2010 government report) have confirmed that street prostitution has been reduced by more than half..."
ノルディックモデル(性購買罪)は、需要を罰し供給側(売られる側)を非犯罪化・出口支援するものです。性売買を「合意ある労働」ではなく、構造的不平等と搾取の結果と位置づけます。
スウェーデンの公式評価(2010年政府報告など)では、路上売春は半減以上し、需要抑制効果と態度変化が確認され、近隣諸国に比べて組織的人身取引の定着が相対的に抑制されたとされています。完全消滅を主張するものではなく、需要を社会的に否認する規範形成が目的です。一方、性売買合法化・非犯罪化が進んだ国(ドイツ・オランダなど)では市場規模と人身取引が拡大したとの報告が複数あります。日本の現状は「需要を罰せず、市場を放置・容認している」点で、残念ながら、これら性売買合法化モデルに近い構造です。
Wow, @drianpace someone I have never interacted with before, decided to reply to me and pre-emptively block me - so much for 'free speech'!
1
90
And for the record, I am against any sport (boxing/MMA/wrestling) that allows knock-outs or choke-holds, it's just too dangerous.
1
41
I also have a suspicion that @ObhishekSaha is using a sock-puppet account (look at the similarity between the screen names) to call people morons and retards.
1
32
Wow, @HeadWarriorTWM has stopped me from replying to him because I assumed, from his profile and posts, that he was a teacher working with young people!
1
49
What a bizarre over-reaction! If you are going to defend porn you should be able to reply to criticisms of your defence of porn!
1
37




















