While, I appreciate Jim's engagement on the subject of Climate Change and the associated graph, he provided, I and the rest of the paleoclimate community can fined no evidence for his bull-shit-ola (the Russian word I have invented for bull S*).
In non-activist science, this is referred to a great big nothingburger.
Replying to @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
While Antarctica is not uniformly โgetting cooler,โ and the main process driving its contribution to sea level rise is not surface air-temperature melting.
I don't know the Russian word for Bull Shit but let's say it's bullshitolia.
While I agree that the evidence is fairly uniform that Antarctica has been a net contributor to sea-level rise for thousands of years, it has been dominated by West Antarctica (especially the Amundsen Sea sector: Thwaites, Pine Island, and nearby glaciers).
As far as I know the dominant mechanism in the Amundsen sector is ocean-driven basal melting of floating ice shelves by relatively warm Circumpolar Deep Water. This thins the shelves, reduces buttressing, and lets grounded ice flow faster into the ocean. It does not require warm surface air temperatures over the ice sheet. Surface mass balance (snowfall minus melt/runoff) can even be positive while dynamic discharge dominates the net loss.
But as far as I can tell, it has nothing to do with your imaginary anthropogenic warming.
Replying to @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
Nope. All facts you seem to post appear to be false.
Replying to @Kenneth72712993 @jimdtweet @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
I've recreated Hansen's work, explained his predictions and shown how his pole predictions were a complete failure.
Replying to @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
Why don't we ever see time series of those 1980's products?
Seems like the last 2000 years would be more accurate given that the further back we go the less accurate the data. That's according to Mann of course.
Replying to @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
"Why don't we ever see time series of those 1980's products?"
Pretty sure I have shown you more than just the 1980's here.
Replying to @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
Let's zoom out more.
Odd how there is a remarkable difference for the last 2000 years in the data you worship and the other proxies.
The evidence seems to suggest the smoothed data doesn't resemble the more pertinent 2000 years of stomata data.
What do you think this means?
Replying to @jimdtweet @Kenneth72712993 @rln_nelson @HavanaM10 @Willard1951 @priscian @aSinister @FChecker76 @FredHikes @DaleGribble_666 @karleastlondon @balls95652097 @B_Bolshevik100 @NewNormality20 @TWTThisIsNow @caseymurph1 @BubbasRanch @BrianvLowe @connolly_s @RogerCoppock @DanCady @jgorman2424 @badmoonrising11 @Robin_Hagues @fergy1999 @ladyspat1 @SpurglyD @stevenmosher @kuhn_reinhard @Over400ppm @turpinator929 @MystickTheater @claude_roumain @Voight_Kampff_3 @JimFish56837379 @Setophaga9 @CalvinZod @freddreise @FriendsOScience @DMDent @HuygensWill
Strange how you have faith in a highly smoothed version of CO2, while other proxies show a lot of variation.
Why isn't that part of your narrative?










