Neo-Vorticism Chronicling the art of velocity. ⊕ BÏF§ZF+18 ⊕
Joined December 2020
- Tweets16.1K
- Following1.5K
- Followers5.2K
- Likes24.2K
Scowl retweeted
BÏF§ZF+18: Simultaneità e Chimismi lirici," a landmark Futurist artist’s book and poetry collection by Ardengo Soffici, published in Florence in 1915. The book is one of the most important and visually striking examples of Italian Futurism’s experiments with “words-in-freedom” (parole in libertà)—compositions blending poetry, typography, and visual art to convey the dynamism and simultaneity central to Futurist aesthetics
Scowl retweeted
"I say that the new generations are already no longer human generations; rather monstrous caricatures where nothing persists save for meat, the exterior, which is nothing more than a simulacrum. This magma of a humanity has the typical weight of shit."
Armel Guerne, to Cioran.
Scowl retweeted
"Repitamos juntos: es falso cuando Marx designa a la historia como una 'continua transformación de la naturaleza humana'. Los pueblos que han sido puestos en consideración para el socialismo han preservado sus rasgos psicológicos fundamentales de su tipo humano general y de su naturaleza racial inalterados".
– Ludwig Woltmann, "Antropología política. Una investigación sobre la influencia de la teoría de la descendencia en la doctrina del desarrollo político de los pueblos", 1903
"La historia biológica de las razas humanas es la verdadera y fundamental historia de los estados. En vez de eso la gente hasta ahora ha hecho casi exclusivamente el desarrollo de instituciones políticas e ideas, de la manera más unilateral, el tema de las investigaciones históricas, olvidando completamente a los seres humanos mismos — las razas vivientes, familias e individuos — como los creadores orgánicos y los portadores de la historia intelectual y política".
- Ludwig Woltmann, "Antropología política. Una investigación sobre la influencia de la teoría de la descendencia en la doctrina del desarrollo político de los pueblos", 1903
NORDIC-CUBANO ARTISTIC EXPRESSION
Essay: Latina Gothic: How anti-colonial struggle informed our signature dark glamour latimes.com/delos/story/2026…
Scowl retweeted
It is difficult to pin down an exact number for whites in Rhodesia in the 1960s and 70s because people came as quickly as they went. That said the number of whites in the country never reached 300,000.
The 7,000 figure for Jews is a gross understatement. The Rhodesian government classified Jews as white Europeans with no further ethnic data and only those who actively practiced the Jewish religion were counted as Jews. Jews by the 1960s and 70s did not practice Judaism and often identified as atheists. So the real figure, if atheist Jews and mischlings are counted, was probably much higher than broad estimates of 7,000 (your wikipedia source) to others claiming 8500, and some high pre UDI estimates of 10,000.
The prime minister of Rhodesia preceding Ian Smith was literally a Lithuanian Jew named Sir Roy Welensky. Welensky agreed with all of Smith’s Tory pseudo racism and governed similarly to the UDI. Rhodesian Jews started leaving post UDI Rhodesia because sanctions were harming their businesses.
Ian Smith was a Tory faggot, not a white racialist. The Rhodesian Front was riddled with Jews, including some comically obvious Israeli spies like Eli Broomberg. Smith in his “evolution not revolution” speeches makes it clear he is a Tory civic nationalist. In his memoirs, he attacks South African Apartheid as racist and -- Smith being an enemy of Europe who fought to support the Italian communist terrorists against Mussolini -- perceived Boer nationalism as a type of Nazism. In the Rhodesian Jewish gated community interracial marriage was allowed and non-whites were welcome as long as they had a certain net worth. It’s not really that different from a suburb in the USA or a posh part of the UK.
Many white people around the world hate the British not because they “hate Anglos", but instead because the British empire is responsible for the murder of 10s of millions of Aryan people, usually while acting as the mindless muscle of Jewish high finance. PseudoHistorian reminds me of the people who dismiss those who hate communism and the Soviet Union as “Russophobes.” The British empire in the 19th and 20th century was just the other side of the Jewish coin.
Erik Striker has got to be the strangest person in this entire space
These figures are just completely made up, I genuinely don’t know where he got them unless he’s grossly rounding down the White figure and rounding up the Jewish figure to make Rhodesia sound more ‘Jewish’ or whatever. Just shy of 300,000 Whites, 7,000 Jews (the majority left during independence)
Cecil Rhodes was the driving force behind Rhodesia, not his subservient Jewish right hand man Alfred Beit (the hint is kind of in the name Rhodesia). Can he not imagine a world in which a White man is the main character, rather than a pawn in some nefarious Jewish scheme?
‘Rhodesia was specifically created to flood the White settlements of South Africa with African scab labour’ — what are we even saying? If anything you could say the opposite, they always sought to KEEP their cheap African labour and prevented them from going south (where the wages were better)
Mining wasn’t even Rhodesia’s main industry (he thinks this because he’s only read Hobson who published Imperialism in 1902 and doesn’t know anything about Rhodesia), so what’s the critique here, people from England moved to Rhodesia after WW2 to become farmers? Hardly a get rich quick scheme, that all required building something from nothing
Just a rambling series of lies to paint anything Anglo (be it American or British) as ‘Jewish’ because that’s like evil and nefarious o algo
Jews themselves don’t claim anywhere near as much gentile history for themselves as striker does. If you listened to this guy you’d think Jews really were the master race and we’re all helpless pawns with no agency
I'm not dying for Haiti, let the Dominicans do it.
“It’s time to colonize Haiti”, noted a recent UK Spectator column. According to Bruce Gilley, Canada should oversee “a formal UN trusteeship over the country.”
The Montreal raised, University of Toronto graduate, demonstrates a scarcity of imagination in making his colonialist appeal. Highlighting an openly colonial streak in Canadian politics, prominent voices have repeatedly promoted formally usurping Haitian sovereignty. “The only way to save Haiti is to put it under UN control,” noted a 2022 Globe and Mail headline. In 2014 right-wing Quebec City radio host, Sylvain Bouchard, told listeners, “I would transform Haiti into a colony. The UN must colonize Haiti.”
Two years later another Quebec City radio host, André Arthur, labeled Haiti a “hopeless” and “sexually deviant” country populated by thieves and prostitutes that should be taken over by France as in the “heyday of colonial Haiti” (“belle époque de l’Haïti colonial”). “There is no hope in Haiti until the country is placed under trusteeship”, bellowed the former Member of Parliament in 2016. “We will never dare to do it, political correctness, it would be racism to say: So you say to France: … ‘For the next thirty years, you are the owner of Haiti, put it right. Kick the asses that need to be kicked.”
During the 2003 “Ottawa initiative on Haiti” conference to plan the ouster of elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide US, French and Canadian officials discussed putting the country under UN trusteeship while a 2005 Canadian Military Journal article was titled “The case for international trusteeship in Haiti”.
In the US edition of the Spectator - “the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the English language” - Gilley lays out a startlingly biased portrayal of Haiti’s revolution and subsequent history. The Portland State University professor writes, “If only the rebels had waited. The abolition of slavery within the French empire came in 1794. But by then, Haiti was already hurtling towards misery under its new rulers.”
It was the Africans of Saint Domingue freeing themselves that spurred the French to (temporarily) abolish slavery.
After winning their liberation from slavery and colonial rule in a war that killed half the population over thirteen years, Haitians were forced to pay their former masters an astronomical sum for their freedom. Under threat of invasion and the restoration of slavery, Francophile Haitian president Jean-Pierre Boyer agreed in 1825 to pay French slaveholders 150 million francs for lost land and now free Haitians.
In a remarkable inversion, Gilley calls a ransom that took the beleaguered country a century to pay as helping Haiti “get its house into order.” The author of a controversial 2017 Third World Quarterly article headlined "The Case for Colonialism", claims “the indemnity was the only thing that prevented Haiti from sliding into pure dysfunction in the 19th century.”
While calling for a UN trusteeship, Grilley ignores the abuses of the 2004-2017 United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), which consisted of 8,000 foreign troops and 2,000 police (a smaller UN force remained for several more years). After helping oust thousands of elected officials in 2004, 500 Canadian soldiers were incorporated into MINUSTAH as it backed up a coup government’s violent crackdown against pro-democracy protesters between March 2004 and May 2006. The UN force also killed dozens of civilians directly when it pacified Cité Soleil, a bastion of support for Aristide. The UN force was responsible for innumerable sexual abuses and its disregard for Haitian life caused a major cholera outbreak, which left over 10,000 dead and one million sick.
The UN occupation introduced a form of multilateral colonial oversight to Haiti. The April 2004 Security Council resolution that replaced the two-month-old US, France and Canada Multinational Interim Force with MINUSTAH established the Core Group, which includes representatives of the US, Canada, France, Spain, Brazil, OAS, EU and UN. The Core Group periodically releases collective statements on Haitian affairs and meet among themselves and with Haitian officials. It’s a flagrantly colonial alliance. After President Jovenel Moise was killed in 2021, for instance, the Core Group effectively appointed Ariel Henry prime minister through a tweet.
Last year the UN approved a foreign Gang Suppression Force for Haiti. After four El Salvadoran troops were killed a week ago that country has quickly deployed upwards of 1000 troops to Haiti. Its authoritarian President, Nayib Bukele, is using bellicose language, which echoes Gilley’s call for a “Rambo” mission that should tell the gangs we “will wipe you out.”
Those calling for foreign control of Haiti ignore its loss of sovereignty since the 2004 coup. By what standards was the usurpation of Haitian sovereignty successful? By basically any metric, 22 years of US/Canada, UN, Core Group influence in Haiti has been a disaster. But imperialists don’t simply ignore the damaging impact of foreign intervention. In a stark demonstration of how power affects ideology, the more Haitian sovereignty is undercut the more forthright the calls to usurp Haitian sovereignty.
From an urban perspective the creative classes consists of unbearable shitlibery and DEI hires. The wageslave scene is lumpen-Maoist psychological torture. You have to map out a road into the middle class that avoids Asiatic striverism as much as possible.
I have known average-looking guys who pulled this off. One guy I know shacked up with some Asian immigrant chick and went on welfare, stayed home while she worked, and studied IT skills and certificates all day while skipping the wageslave/jeet filled college life. Once he got a decent job, he fucked off. Got to think outside the box.
Scowl retweeted
"La historia biológica de las razas humanas es la verdadera y fundamental historia de los estados. En vez de eso la gente hasta ahora ha hecho casi exclusivamente el desarrollo de instituciones políticas e ideas, de la manera más unilateral, el tema de las investigaciones históricas, olvidando completamente a los seres humanos mismos — las razas vivientes, familias e individuos — como los creadores orgánicos y los portadores de la historia intelectual y política".
- Ludwig Woltmann, "Antropología política. Una investigación sobre la influencia de la teoría de la descendencia en la doctrina del desarrollo político de los pueblos", 1903
I have known average-looking guys who pulled this off. One guy I know shacked up with some Asian immigrant chick and went on welfare, stayed home while she worked, and studied IT skills and certificates all day while skipping the wageslave/jeet filled college life. Once he got a decent job, he fucked off. Got to think outside the box.
There is also a feminine ignorance that eclipses the masculine ignorance that comes from a certain entitlement. An entitlement that absolves oneself from the boldness and courage needed to seek the truth: "You may well say that women refuse to face reality, that they are always burying their heads in the sand, etc. "Well, have it your own way, but for me it’s all very simple: there are a certain number of horrible things in the world which I prefer not to know about. My dignity as a woman, and eventually as a wife and mother, forbids it: I should be sullied forever. Let the world do as it likes — I personally have the right to ignore as much of it as I please"."
Women are group seekers, sure, but a certain female trait that should not be discounted is their stubbornness. Henry de Montherlant brilliantly discusses this: "For obstinacy is the blind and crude opposition of the self to a reality which it fails to grasp; and this opposition is a feminine thing. People talk of diseases of the will. The will itself is also at times a disease."
Women are group seekers, sure, but a certain female trait that should not be discounted is their stubbornness. Henry de Montherlant brilliantly discusses this: "For obstinacy is the blind and crude opposition of the self to a reality which it fails to grasp; and this opposition is a feminine thing. People talk of diseases of the will. The will itself is also at times a disease."
Women make the worst leaders, because of their natural-born and evolutionary trait to please and avoid conflict so that they're not left out of the reference group.
Now, the only question is, what the F is the reference group @Statsmin associates to?