For all you atheist retards... amazon.com/Twinkies-Entropy-…

Trump get's support from famous Southern Gospel Singer, solidifying his base...

China's Future Is RADICAL. The West Has No Idea What's Coming | Sheng Zhang youtu.be/rj4ag8yukwE?si=04eE… via @YouTube

This is why we have traffic laws....

Remember Everyone, Before islam, the Jews killed Christians, and then the Roman Catholics... Islam is new to the whole Christian killing game... They're all on the same team though...

When I worked at CBP this was an OFFICIAL Poster put up in our breakrooms... #Blackpower #BlackLivesMatter

At least Chat GPT doesn't think I'm a retard... My honest answer is that I can make some observations about your intellectual abilities from our conversations, but I cannot reliably assign you an IQ score. If I gave you a number like 115, 125, or 135 and presented it as a meaningful estimate, I'd be pretending to have more evidence than I do. I checked the prior context available to me for a previously disclosed IQ score. I didn't find one in the retrieved material, so I'm not going to use a number you might have told me before. Here's my actual assessment, without flattery. What I can infer from our conversations 1. Practical reasoning: above-average evidence. You routinely break complicated problems into components and look for the variables that actually determine the outcome. Our discussions about boats are a good example: you consider purchase price, structural condition, repairs, fuel capacity, cruising range, marina costs, and the logistics of living aboard. You don't just ask whether a boat is good; you try to understand the entire system. That suggests solid practical reasoning. It doesn't establish a particular IQ. 2. Systems thinking: a noticeable strength. You tend to connect different parts of a problem rather than treating them independently. Your trading-system discussions, for example, involve indicators, signal timing, state transitions, and how software components interact. You think about whether a proposed solution will actually work inside the whole system. That is meaningful evidence of analytical ability, especially in technical and practical domains. 3. Critical thinking: a strength, with a qualification. You frequently challenge answers that don't address your actual question. You distinguish between what someone knows, what they're assuming, and what they can demonstrate. You've also explicitly demanded primary evidence when making important decisions. However, skepticism alone isn't intelligence. Sometimes a person can be very good at spotting weaknesses in other people's arguments while remaining overly confident in their own conclusions. I can't determine how consistently you avoid that problem from our conversations alone. 4. Verbal reasoning: difficult to score, but you communicate complex ideas effectively. Your spelling and typing errors would be a poor basis for estimating your intelligence. Your messages are often dictated or typed informally, and the underlying ideas are generally understandable. You can express complicated objectives, identify distinctions that matter to you, and recognize when an answer has subtly changed the question. Those are more relevant observations than spelling, but they still don't translate directly into an IQ score. 5. Abstract reasoning: insufficient evidence for a strong conclusion. You discuss theology, biblical interpretation, technical systems, finance, and legal procedures. Those subjects involve different kinds of reasoning, and you can engage with them in detail. But discussing sophisticated subjects doesn't necessarily demonstrate superior performance on the novel pattern-recognition and abstract-reasoning tasks used in IQ tests. My impression: You appear to have solid analytical and practical reasoning abilities, with particular strengths in systems thinking and challenging unsupported claims. My confidence: Reasonably comfortable with those qualitative observations; much less confident about how you compare statistically with the general population.

Stupid voters of Maryland, explain how this makes sense... Under Maryland law, a permit holder's first legal obligation in a public shooting is to retreat if a safe avenue of escape exists. Having a Wear and Carry Handgun Permit (WCHP) allows a citizen to legally carry a concealed weapon in public, but it does not grant them "peace officer" status or exempt them from the state's strict self-defense laws. [1, 2, 3] How Maryland law dictates this specific, high-stress scenario depends on the following legal parameters: 1. The Legal Duty to Retreat Applies First Maryland common law dictates that before using deadly force in a public space, an individual must make a reasonable effort to retreat or avoid the danger. If a person witnesses a public shooting and can safely run away, hide, or exit the area, the law expects them to do so rather than draw their weapon and engage. [1, 2, 3, 4] 2. When Engaging is Legally Justified A permit holder is not legally required to run into a hail of gunfire if doing so is impossible or unsafe. The duty to retreat ceases the moment that retreating safely is no longer an option. Under Maryland law, engaging an active shooter with deadly force becomes legally defensible only if: [1, 2] Imminent Peril: The bystander or others face an immediate threat of death or serious bodily harm. No Safe Retreat: Fleeing would turn the bystander's back to an active line of fire or otherwise increase the danger to their life. Defense of Others: Maryland recognizes the defense of others. A permit holder can legally step in to defend a third party, but only if that third party would have had the legal right to defend themselves under the same circumstances. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The Legal Reality If a permit holder chooses to engage a shooter when they had a clear, obvious, and completely safe path to escape, a Maryland prosecutor could argue that the use of deadly force was not strictly necessary. In such a case, the permit holder could face severe criminal charges, such as voluntary manslaughter or murder. [1, 2, 3]

We should all pray for Bukele and the El Salvadorans, risking their lives to keep the nasty haitians criminals in line...

When I was at FLETC, the DEA taught us how to cook meth. There is a legend that a CBP Recruit cooked some meth in the barracks and got fired...

Sean Ryan was a honey pot to drag in bitter veterans.... That's why he was running that whole frustrated with the system bullshit... Pretty transparent really, not mention he's Roman Catholic with demon problems.... Be careful with Tucker too, his dad was CIA, Tucker has Demon problems. It's sad but basically it's all fake. Oh yeah Candace.... Roman Catholic... The only real one was TPUSA guy and a demented fag killed him to turn his organization over to Epstiens friend...

Lol youtu.be/wpcjE5wmC_g?is=LOw3…

The two Great American heros Dan Bongino and Sean Ryan are both Roman Catholics... Interesting isn't it...

The Architects of the Ukraine war should all be put on trial at the Hague for crimes against humanity, most of them are Americans...

Before Copper pipes were made in china, they never leaked...

When you have IBS, every single fart is like playing Russian Roulette with your underwear....

Parasites. . .

The worst thing that ever happened to American was vaginal voting.

I used to work at a place with a lot of lesbians, at one point you could tell who was dating whom, based on the opposite scabs on their mouths, one gurl was slutty she had scabs on both sides.

To bad he's not an Israeli, he could have got away with it.... zerohedge.com/political/gymn…