Ex LUNC validator
themetaverse
Joined March 2023
- Tweets3.3K
- Following1.1K
- Followers3.9K
- Likes2.3K
Yes agreed it could be viewed as a conflict of interest. Nonsense there is any rule or even guideline stating you can not vote for your own proposal! Stick to facts 👍🏻
1
50
You can 100% vote on your own proposal, there is no rule or even guideline stating you cant! I ALWAYS voted on my own props, this is total nonsense
1
1
22
You have stated 'its prohibited' & these people are 'scammers' this is totally incorrect so no you need to be called out for BS nonsense, stick to facts 👍🏻
1
4
41
You can 100% vote on your own proposal, there is no rule or even guideline stating you cant! I ALWAYS voted on my own props, this is total nonsense
1
1
65
Goodgod who is it with all these rando accounts, yes you can 100% vote on your own proposal i always used to. There is no rule or even guideline saying you cant.
3
53
No you are not, you can 100% vote on your own prop, i always used to. What even gives you this impression 😂😂
3
18
'Unofficial' 'rule' 😂😂😂
I ALWAYS voted on my own props, no reason not to, everybody seems to forget as a validator you represent your delegates. If a majority vote against you its a good signal you got it wrong.
23
Lunc does not care about security relaxing KYC proved that! There will be serious issues at some stage! I closed my validator & sold due to the stupid attitude toward anything security related 🤷♂️
130
& you have helped a lot of validators with advice when onboarding, helped many validators with improved settings for a stronger validator set, provided a testnet node at your own cost when it was desperately required & much much more! ❤️
1
3
151
Those that have actually taken the time to get to know you properly KNOW you've only got the best interests of others at heart! one of the most genuine & nicest people ive met in this space.
1
6
103
SolidV retweeted
This is inexcusable. $LUNC $USTC
The fact that a group of 5 Validators, vetoed an actual security audit, is beyond measure.
And even worse, that those 5 maliciously used the veto to overrule the will of 24 others, on a topic that is of vital importance to the overall security of the chain.
Governance is broken.
I would love to know what @cz_binance thinks about the veto being used against a security audit for a L1 chain.
