Daniel Gutenberg retweeted
Once you see the world through this lens, a lot of things that looked random suddenly make sense.
You understand why Macron recognized a Palestinian state at the UN. Not a state with borders it controls, a single government, or elections. A symbol. A gesture for domestic consumption, performed on the world stage. That's the politics of posture over reality, the obłuda I described earlier: what matters isn't what is true on the ground, it's the narrative you get to emit.
You understand why Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of France's hard left and a man trained in Trotskyist organizations in his youth, made Gaza the center of his politics and refused for months to call Hamas a terrorist organization. Look at the mechanism. He doesn't address French Muslims as individuals with their own jobs, families, ambitions and disagreements. He addresses them as a bloc. A mass to be mobilized. That's the collectivist reflex in its purest form: you don't speak to people, you herd categories. Yesterday the proletariat, today identity blocs. The individual disappears every time.
You understand why Zohran Mamdani built his rise on the Democratic Socialists of America. The mayor of New York isn't just a progressive Democrat. He's a DSA member, and DSA doesn't hide what it is: an organization that openly calls itself socialist and treats the Democratic Party as a vehicle. His campaign promised a rent freeze, city-run grocery stores, free buses. Every one of those ideas has the same shape: the individual steps back, the city steps in. The price is set by the planner, the store is run by the planner, and voters are addressed as categories, tenants, riders, communities, rather than as free people who can build something of their own.
And Mamdani didn't come out of nowhere. The same movement helped send Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to Congress in 2018, and Bernie Sanders spent decades making the word "socialist" respectable in American politics. Different faces, same software. The lie isn't that they hide their ideology. It's the promise attached to it: that you can freeze prices without killing supply, that the state can run what entrepreneurs run, that someone else will always pay. That promise has been tested on every continent. It has never been kept.
And you understand the most important thing: collectivists need chaos.
This isn't a metaphor. It's their own doctrine. Lenin's strategy in 1914 was to turn the war between nations into a civil war inside them. The Soviet Union spent decades arming and funding movements across the Middle East and pushed through the 1975 UN resolution equating Zionism with racism. The KGB had an entire doctrine, "active measures," dedicated to amplifying every division inside Western societies. A stable, prosperous, confident society is the collectivist's worst enemy. Chaos is his natural habitat.
Why? Because chaos is the perfect justification. It justifies emergency powers. It justifies more state. It turns citizens into frightened masses looking for a shepherd. It replaces individual judgment with tribal loyalty. A society at peace with itself asks the planner: what do we need you for?
Look at the two great conflicts of our time through this lens.
Russia's war in Ukraine was launched by a former KGB officer who called the collapse of the Soviet Union the greatest catastrophe of the century. A man formed in the exact school that treated chaos as a weapon. He doesn't just wage war on Ukraine. He wages it on Western cohesion, feeding every division he can find in our elections, our streets, our feeds.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the perfect fuel for Western politics. It splits every campus, every party, every city. It lets politicians like Mélenchon build an electoral base on permanent outrage. And for everyone who lives off that outrage, a real peace would be a disaster. Ask yourself honestly: who in our political class actually has an interest in this conflict ending?
That's the pattern. The people who live off chaos never solve it. They manage it, they feed it, they posture around it. Because a solved problem is a lost lever.
Freedom produces order from the bottom up: people who own things, build things, trade with each other and have something to lose. Collectivism produces disorder from the bottom up and then sells you order from the top down.
Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
A lot of people are trying to explain the Epstein affair through antisemitism. They're looking at the wrong axis.
Bill Gates isn't Jewish. He met Epstein several times, years after Epstein's conviction. If your theory is ethnic, it collapses on the very first name.
I read the Epstein affair through a different lens: the oldest war in human history. The individual versus the mass. Private property, freedom to build, freedom to grow, versus the mind that looks at humanity and sees livestock to be managed.
Look at what Epstein actually believed. He told scientists he wanted to "seed the human race with his DNA" by impregnating women at his New Mexico ranch. In emails released this year, he argued that racial gaps in test scores were genetic and pushed genetic editing as the answer. He mused to an AI researcher that "maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation."
Notice what's missing from all of it: the individual. Only populations, stocks, gene pools, numbers to optimize. Humans as raw material for a design drawn up by someone who considers himself above them.
That's not a Jewish trait. It's not even a left or right trait in the electoral sense. It's the mental structure at the core of Marxism: the conviction that an enlightened few have the right to engineer humanity from above, and that individuals are just inputs. Marx wanted to remake man through the economy. The eugenicists wanted to remake him through breeding. The transhumanists want to remake him through technology. Same posture. The planner and the herd.
Communism never died. It changed vocabulary. From the Politburo to the Davos panel. From the five-year plan to the global roadmap. From "the new Soviet man" to "optimizing the species." And the people who hold this view don't need to be cynical. They sincerely believe they're the shepherds.
Which brings us to the AI era. Bill Gates said on national TV that within a decade humans won't be needed "for most things." Think about what that sentence assumes. That a human being's value is their output. That once a machine can produce it, you're surplus. That someone, somewhere, will decide what you're still allowed to do.
That's the real fault line of this century. Not Jews versus non-Jews. Not even left versus right. Collectivists versus free people. Those who see humanity as a mass to be managed, and those who see each human being as sovereign: owner of their body, their work, their property, their future.
AI can go two ways. It can be the greatest tool of individual empowerment ever built, letting one person do what used to take an entire company. Or it can be the ultimate instrument of the planner, the dream every central committee ever had, finally within reach.
Epstein is not an anomaly. He's a symptom. The question isn't who he was connected to by blood. The question is who shares his view of humanity.
Choose your side.
Amazing !
1/ Together with @ltx_io, we used Maxwell, our Code Execution Model, to make video generation in LTX-2.5 1.87x faster.
With Maxwell, generating a five-second 4K clip on 2xB200s went from 250 seconds to only 134. No quantization or loss of quality at all. The code is open source.
Speechless ! Such Heros !
Listen to Yaniv explain to @IsraeliPM the critical moments of the rescue - a remarkable display of Israeli and Emirati courage. 🇮🇱🤝🇦🇪
Daniel Gutenberg retweeted
The holy grail for robotics is being able to generalize: doing work in unseen places
We rented 30 homes in the Bay Area and are doing tasks without any new training
it was just a matter of time and will significantly change the price of car ownership going forward !
Australian Insurance provider @Zurich is now offering cheaper insurance for Teslas with FSD (Supervised) activated — an Australian first 🇦🇺
Zurich says Tesla data shows FSD-equipped cars have 7x fewer major or minor collisions than regular EVs.
We’ve come a long way. Tesla IPO value was a thousandth of its current value!
Daniel Gutenberg retweeted
Waymo: 94% fewer serious or fatal injury crashes than human drivers over 220 million autonomous miles. 16 of the test drivers were hurt by hard braking. Buckle up.
Daniel Gutenberg retweeted
An update on FSD Supervised in Europe
FSD is currently approved in five EU countries (NL, DK, BE, EE, LT), used by >70k customers for over 1 million km per day, and is 4.1x less likely to get into a crash compared to manual driving, measured across 100 million km on public EU roads.
Leading up to a potential EU-wide approval vote for FSD Supervised on October 6th, 2026, we have decided to open-source one of the key pieces of evidence used to support the Netherlands approval.
As a reminder, we adjusted the FSD design to be compliant with existing regulation (UN-R-171 DCAS) but requested an exemption for certain behaviors via the EU Article 39 procedure. The following dashboard is evidence of safety for those exemptions.
This exact dashboard was shared with all EU Member States in April 2026, shortly after RDW’s approval, and all data presented is from before that date.
tesla.com/fsd-evidence-dashb…
European countries recorded 19,400 road deaths in 2025. That's around 53 deaths/day, with the vast majority of these crashes attributed to human error. These deaths are largely preventable with technology we have today.
FSD Supervised is already saving lives where it’s approved – yet in much of Europe, that safety benefit remains locked behind bureaucracy.
Daniel Gutenberg retweeted
In the last 4 months, FSD Supervised has been over 5.2x safer than manual driving – across 65 million kilometers in 5 EU countries
Daniel Gutenberg retweeted
I do not say this lightly: As a new and virulent strain of antisemitism spreads via algorithmic media and artificial intelligence, my life's work an an historian has been a failure. What now? A new essay with John-Clark Levin for @TheFP
Such a great event and cool movie ! Thank you all for coming !
Daniel Gutenberg (@Soonicorn) called EWOR Connect Maui the “highest future unicorn density of any event I’ve ever seen”.
This is the man who invested in Airbnb, Facebook, Netscape, SumUp, MobilEye, and many more incredible companies.
What wasn't obvious was what each founder had to overcome personally to get here.
Ilaria spent years questioning whether she had what it takes to found a startup. Deciding to commit turned out to be the hardest part.
@josiahsenu had to stop believing that someone from his background couldn't create extraordinary outcomes. He never felt ready and built anyway.
@okaris knew what it felt like to miss a great wave. It's why catching the right one now feels almost unreal to him. Years of effort are suddenly compounding.
Riding a wave and building a generation-defining company demand the same things: the foresight to see a shift forming while everyone else still sees a flat sea, and the nerve to commit before the timing feels safe.
Nobody catches the next wave alone. The ones riding it early find each other at EWOR.
Watch the film below.


























