Passionate about the universe and everything that’s in it.
Netherlands
Joined June 2025
- Tweets3.3K
- Following262
- Followers110
- Likes7.9K
Pinned Tweet
Wondering how many Flat Earthers have reached out to the thousands of members of the Astronomical League over the years, offering to help them "re-measure" the distance to the sun.
🤔
AI gets accused of 'emotional bias' the second a conspiracy theorist dislikes the facts.
Hilarious @grok! 🤭
CuriousNeuron retweeted
Amazing footage of a meteor exploding over the active volcano Mount Sakurajima in Japan.
Photos aren’t magical standalone proofs, they’re part of a broader puzzle.
We don't just rely on space pics. Satellite telemetry, independent radio tracking, weather forecasting models, and ground optics all align with those images. The puzzle fits. 🌏🧵
A photo alone isn't absolute proof, but when physics, math, GPS systems, and independent observational data all match the photo, it's no longer just a picture.
It's reality. Dismissing every piece of evidence as "CGI" is just intellectual laziness.
CuriousNeuron retweeted
If the Earth is flat, a continuous flight over both the North AND South Pole in a single loop around the world is physically impossible on every Flat Earth map model.
Yet, in November 1965, the 'Rockwell Polar Flight' did exactly that.
Let’s break down the facts. 🧵
If the Earth is flat, a continuous flight over both the North AND South Pole in a single loop around the world is physically impossible on every Flat Earth map model.
Yet, in November 1965, the 'Rockwell Polar Flight' did exactly that.
Let’s break down the facts. 🧵
CuriousNeuron retweeted
Here's my postmortem of the celestial theodolite. In short, you have to account for refraction when dealing with occultations of stars by objects in our atmosphere, cel theo breaks down at high alt targets at high distance and the distances used the globe.
youtu.be/s8xTH4z7_Wo
Earth is passing through Halley’s Comet debris for the Orionids peak.
How do people explain annual, mathematically predictable meteor showers hitting our upper atmosphere on a flat, stationary disk without admitting space and orbital paths are real? 🙂
bbc.com/weather/articles/cm1…
Did NASA really 'lose' the tech to go to the Moon? Of course not.
The tech wasn't lost, it was retired. Why would anyone rebuild 1960s analog hardware when you can engineer modern digital systems? Upgrading takes time, not magic. 🧵
Did humanity 'lose the tech' to build CRT TVs, floppy disks, or the ocean liners of the 1930s? No. The factories closed, the supply chains evolved, and the world moved on to new tech.
