Syd Crafty

Meet Me In The Graveyard

Sinéad O'Connor said her mother beat her naked from infancy to age 13, forcing her to spread her limbs so she could stamp on her abdomen - trying to destroy her womb. She'd cheerfully answer the phone mid-beating, her foot still on Sinéad's body. At five, Sinéad won a kindergarten prize for curling into the smallest ball. Years later, she tore up the Pope's photo on live TV to protest child abuse. In the video below Sinéad O'Connor describes for the first time what her mother did to her behind closed doors. The day her father left, her mother was furious the children were upset. She made them live in the garden shed. For months. She dressed Sinéad like a boy. Chopped her hair off. Told her she shouldn't have been born, that she wanted a son. Made her strip naked before every beating so she could attack her stomach directly. Said she wanted to burst her womb. Stop her from being female. One weekend Sinéad put on a dress with a missing button. Her mother beat her, took the light bulb out of her room, locked her inside and left for the entire weekend. Every last day of school the other kids celebrated. Sinéad and her brother cried and hid the hockey sticks and tennis rackets around the house. It never worked. She'd invent a reason anyway. A crooked lampshade. A dusty shelf. Anything. Every morning when they heard her footsteps on the stairs they wet themselves with fear. She made Sinéad repeat: I am nothing. I am nothing. Over and over until she believed it. She ran away at 13. Never received trauma treatment. Said the only therapy she ever had was music. Was Sinéad O'Connor's mother a sadist, or something worse - a woman who looked completely normal to everyone outside that house?

A male that’s larping as a woman is complaining about his experience in a lesbian bar that says it’s inclusive to males aka trans women. The bar has decided to be inclusive, that doesn’t mean the lesbians in that bar have to pretend they don’t know you’re a male. How narcissistic are these males ? First they wanted in on women’s spaces now they want all the women in these spaces to fawn over these men and pretend they are a woman and treat them as such.

You are absolutely right. It's so insulting that anyone would expect us to accept it. Oh and if we speak out somehow we are racist. Fck that. Call me whatever you want. America will never be a communist country and we need to break up this whole red-green alliance right freaking now. Here's my plan...lols...from my couch I am going to start a one woman revolution against communism...😂 Seriously though when I think about the left and how they all rally behind Orange Man Bad I think we need that. A common enemy and Communism is the least controversial. So I really think we need to start just plastering it everywhere.

As conservatives we have a lot to worry about. We are so cooked.

and do what? pray? yell and scream? call our congressmen? lmfao. hopium. this country is done....over....cooked.

To everyone hurting tonight, I see you. I'm feeling it too. But don't think for one second President Trump didn't already game out exactly what to do if we lost. He always has a plan. Always. MAGA is alive and well, and if his name had been on the ticket tonight, we would have won. This one's a lesson for the Republican Party. They have to learn to stand on their own two feet instead of riding his coattails. And NOW is the time we start cleaning the two-faced bastards out of our party. You knocked on doors, made the calls, drove people to the polls and posted until your fingers ached. None of that was wasted. So be angry tonight if you need to, then get some sleep. The fight is just beginning and we have work to do. I'll be right here with you. 🇺🇸♥️

Anyone fancy wetting a line in the ‘Top End’ ?

I’m getting married to my best friend…AND dropping a New Music Video on Friday ❤️

Soros is the just element in the chain of globalist network based on liberal open society ideology. It isn’t about money, it is about ideology and global power. Musk is like a kid. No clear ideology, no ambition to rule the world. Just childish dream to save it. But it looks nice

On Sunday 1 November, a husband and father to two young children was allegedly attacked with a baseball bat outside his home in Torquay, Victoria, after confronting two people who were damaging One Nation signs on his property. He is now in hospital with multiple facial fractures and bleeding on the brain. He faces a long recovery. He runs his own business and is the family's only income earner. While he is recovering, the family has no money coming in. His work vehicle was also badly damaged in the alleged attack. His family should be able to focus on his recovery without the added worry of lost income, medical costs and everyday bills. We are keeping his name private to protect him and his family. All funds raised will go directly to the family to help cover these expenses and support his recovery. Any contribution, large or small, will help. If you cannot donate, please consider sharing this page. Thank you for standing with this father and his family. gofundme.com/f/help-a-victor…

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.